Cameron’s housing announcement is his latest attempt to wear Mrs Thatcher’s clothes.
Cameron’s housing announcement is his latest attempt to wear Mrs Thatcher’s clothes
Tory conferences have often kicked off with a prime ministerial housing announcement. This year is no exception. David Cameron has indicated that around 100,000 new ‘starter’ homes will be provided to first-time-buyers aged under 40 years with a discount of 20 per cent on the market price.
Achieving this target is contingent on the Tories being in government come next May of course, so it’s jam tomorrow as so often with such pre-conference announcements.
As he did at the party conference in 2011, when he quadrupled the average discount to £75,000 for the right of tenants to buy their council homes, Cameron’s housing announcement in Birmingham over the weekend is his latest attempt to wear Mrs Thatcher’s clothes as the champion of the ‘property owning democracy’.
It’s worth considering the outcome of Cameron’s ‘rejuvenated’ Right to Buy, which has resulted in the sale of 8,500 social homes with a maximum of 6,400 replacements apparently appearing at some indeterminate future date. This is far from the one-for-one replacement promised by Cameron in 2011 and leaves a shortfall of at least 2,000 social homes.
So responses to this latest housing gimmick should be accompanied with a huge pinch of salt.
The location of the ‘starter’ homes (i.e. very small) just announced will be brownfield sites, mainly in cities and towns, so leaving the Tory countryside free from shouldering its fair share of accommodating the UK’s housing needs, which run at 250,000 extra homes annually for the foreseeable future.
The 20 per cent discount, which will still mean the average price for these homes will be five times the average wage, will be achieved through cheaper brownfield land, by setting aside both the zero-carbon homes standard and developers’ obligations to provide social homes under section 106 planning requirements.
So much for the greenest government in history. And the 5m people on social housing waiting lists will just have to continue to wait.
This announcement is the latest in a series from a government attempting to fill the void where a Housing Strategy should be.
Chart (1) shows the scale of the housing problem with a thirty year downwards trend in the annual number of homes completed. In the last four years, barely half of the required annual number have been provided, storing-up problems for a growing population almost 5m higher in England since Mrs. Thatcher came to power.
Yet we are building far fewer homes for this larger population, which also has a faster rate of household formation due to aging and the growth in single person living. In fact, in 1978, more social homes were built than total homes in 2013 by the private and social sectors combined.
The solution, which is ideologically alien to today’s Tory Party, but not to that of Macmillan, Douglas-Hume, Heath or Major, is to build more social homes, and especially more council homes, as SHOUT has advocated, using public subsidy for bricks and mortar investment rather than lining the pockets of private landlords.
But perhaps that 1 in 4 Tory MPs are private landlords explains the reticence.
Kevin Gulliver is director of Birmingham-based research charity the Human City Institute and chair of the Centre for Community Research but writes in a personal capacity
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
16 Responses to “Another Tory housing gimmick”
Leon Wolfeson
No, I do not live with you.
Gary Scott
Again, addressing the symptom rather than the problem. Cheap housing, empty housing, housing being demolished in the north of England and in Scotland. Overpopulation in London and the South East is not accidental, this is where the employment opportunities are, when the employment is elsewhere there is no reason to build more housing. The problem has always been there but the advent of right to buy under Thatcher meant an end of easily available rentals at reasonable rents. This lead to London wage inflation and further rent inflation and the housing prices spiralled. There are no controls and no benefits except to landlords. London is being crushed under its own weight while sucking the life out of the rest of the country.
Dave C
Dear Dave Roberts, During the last Ice Age, the UK was uninhabitable as it was covered totally in thick ice sheet. So just to make a point you are also an immigrant, so to use your analogy, get back to where you came from.
jack
Let’s dissect the logic of your statement.
Millions of years ago, the landmass that is now the UK was uninhabitable, and so therefore all human beings in the UK came from sonewhere else.
Because of this fact, any suggestion that current levels of immigration might have a bearing on housing economics should be dismissed.
Any economists considering factoring in the possible inpact of inmigration on house prices, housing stocks and land usage should remember the last Ice Age.
JoeDM
If governments dealt with the fundamental problem of uncontrolled immigration of poor quality people then houses would be available at lower prices.