Under this government, disabled people are twice as likely to live in poverty as non disabled people.
Under the coalition, disabled people are twice as likely to live in poverty as non disabled people
This weekend, members of my party will be meeting to shape the policy programme that Labour will take into government.
At the heart of those discussions will be a determination to deliver the vision of One Nation Britain that Ed Miliband has committed us to. Nowhere will that commitment matter more than in relation to our policies for the equality, inclusion and participation of disabled people.
Today, we can see that, under the coalition government, that ambition is way off track.
Last week, an analysis by Just Fair, a consortium which campaigns for a fairer and more just society, demonstrated just how damaging the government’s policies have been for disabled people. Just Fair argue that the UK risks breaching our international obligations to the rights and equality of disabled people as a result of the government’s policies.
Labour is determined that our approach will be to ensure that all our policies advance the equality, dignity and participation of disabled people. Last week, in Scotland, Rachel Reeves announced a set of early commitments for a Labour government that demonstrate our seriousness about that.
Our first priority will be to secure disabled people’s right to fair and decent employment, in two important ways:
We will reform the discredited work capability assessment to ensure it’s fit for purpose. Under our plans, everyone who’s assessed will receive a personal statement of how their condition or impairment impacts on their ability to work, as a gateway to defining and assembling the package of support they’d need if they are able to do so.
We’ll also introduce penalties on assessors for wrong assessments, and we will continue with the independent review process, with a formal role for disabled people to advise and inform the way the assessment works.
The work programme has been a disaster for disabled people, getting only around one in 20 into sustained work. It’s clear that a top down, centrally driven programme can’t deliver the right support for disabled people.
So we will push commissioning of employment programmes down to local level, enabling commissioners who know and understand the local labour market and the support and advice that’s available in the community to design and procure the services that will work for disabled people and ensure they share in our economic success.
One of the most pernicious examples of the government’s failure to secure the rights of disabled people is that they are twice as likely to live in poverty as non disabled people, and this year we have seen an extra 400,000 disabled families facing absolute poverty.
Earlier this year, the independent taskforce on poverty and disability, chaired by Sir Bert Massie, recommended a number of measures to break this disgraceful link. Key among them was scrapping the hated bedroom tax, which has pushed more disabled people and their carers into poverty, and undermined their right to live independently.
It will be Labour’s priority in government to abolish this unworkable and vicious tax.
We will also sort out the chaos that characterises the personal independence payment, working with disabled people to ensure PIP protects them from the risk of poverty, as well as exploring the ideas in the Massie report to address the higher living costs that disabled people face.
These early measures are important in and of themselves to improve the position of disabled people and address the disadvantage they experience.
But they are also emblematic of our overarching commitment to making rights a reality for disabled people, as our international obligations require. Engaging disabled people directly in the design and review of the policies that affect them, and devolving decision-making to local level, will ensure disabled people take a central role in the management of their own lives.
They sit on all fours with the principles of reducing poverty, securing the right to work for those who are able to do so, and protecting the right of disabled people to live independently where and with whom they choose.
They go to the heart of our determination to achieve greater equality, to respect the human rights of disabled people, and to create a One Nation Britain in which every disabled person can realise their potential and live their life to the full.
Kate Green MP​ is shadow minister for disabled people
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
11 Responses to “This government has been a disaster for disabled people”
Leon Wolfeson
Why should they “do something about them” if they work? Quite simply, RPI is the correct model. The model we have now, which is “lower massively every three years” (not even CPI), is wrong…
And Labour are not going to “face up” – I advocate stopping trying that and start demanding proportional representation.
sarntcrip
if you checkout disability now’s interview with the disability shadow you’ll see they barely have any policy other than there is no more money LABOUR(I’M A MEMBER) IS REFUSING TO UNDO THE WRONGS DONE BY THE TORY PARTY WHICH IN MY BOOK MAKES THEM EVERY BIT AS BAD IT’S AMAZING 1.4 MILLION DISABLED PEOPLE ARE ELIGIBLE TO VOTE YET NOBODY WANTS OUR VOTES
sarntcrip
i don’t know what benefits you are on but mine have fallen in real terms not least because council tax benefit is now discretionary and tory councils pay the minimum mine went up , i live in a tory area, by 105% in a year real terms 1% increase is a reductionI SEE LABOUR AS THE LEAST WORST OPTION BUT TO SUGGEST DISABLED BENEFITS ARE BETTER UNDER THE TORIES IS SOMETHING OF A SICK JOKE
treborc1 must be the only one
sarntcrip
yhe tories have only one the welfare argument among those who have rarely if ever been forced to use it with 80+% of the media controlled by non dom oligarchs without british interests at heart and with editors in the ‘very comfortable indeed bracket it’s hardly surprising they brief against welfare and that the bbc fearing for it’s charter and licence income does little more on welfare than reproduce tory press releases verbatim as fact which they aren’t
Mason Dixon, Autistic
Under either CPI or RPI benefits lose substantial value over time. Since the uprating was changed from being linked to average wages in 1979 to inflation, basic unemployment benefits have lost a third of their value. I do not see how this ‘works’ unless success is defined by creating problems for someone else to clean up decades later.