It’s time for David Cameron to get a grip on the chaos which IDS has given rise to at the DWP.
It’s time for David Cameron to get a grip on the chaos which IDS has given rise to at the DWP
Iain Duncan Smith has already racked up multi-million additional costs to the taxpayer with the failed IT and delayed roll-out of the Universal Credit system that aimed to replace some benefits and tax credits.
He originally claimed that more than one million people would be on the new benefit by April 2014, but this week we learnt that Universal Credit is in fact being paid to fewer than 6,000. With fewer and fewer people joining the new benefit system every month, the government’s flagship welfare reform is grinding to a halt.
If one major failure were not enough, Iain Duncan Smith’s department has also been responsible for severe failings in the Work Capability Assessments (WCA) programme. Work Capability Assessments are meant to test people’s capability for work but have been so poorly run that Citizens Advice Bureaux have been swamped with people needing help appealing inaccurate decisions by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP).
These mistakes are costing the taxpayer millions, thanks to the cost of the assessments and then paying for the tribunals – at a time when genuinely disabled people are denied the right support.
In April Rachel Reeves and I set out how a Labour government would reform Work Capability Assessments to help more people into jobs.
New figures released this week have shown that the new Personal Independence Payment looks set to join the DWP’s roll-call of disaster and delay.
In 2010 the coalition also announced the abolition of Disability Living Allowance (DLA) for people aged 16-64. DLA was to be replaced for some of the 1.8 million people affected by a new benefit – Personal Independence Payment (PIP) – announced with the aim of cutting twenty per cent from the total DLA budget.
The DWP planned for 1.3 million people to have gone through the new process by the end of 2015 to provide a £1 billion reduction in expenditure, but so far, on average, fewer than 7,000 people are currently being assessed per month.
Once again, Iain Duncan Smith’s ‘reforms’ have run aground in dramatic fashion. The National Audit Office examined the rollout of Personal Independence Payment since April 2013 and concluded: “Because it may take some time to resolve delays the Department has increased the risk that the programme will not deliver value for money in the longer term”.
Disabled people have the most to lose under such an inefficient system. The additional time waiting could mean losing a job, opportunities to train or even a home.
Taxpayers are also faced with huge costs. At the current rate of assessments it would take 42 years to clear the backlog. And the assessments cost £127m per year to run.
If David Cameron doesn’t get a grip on his work and pensions secretary, there is a real risk that the projected £3 billion annual savings will be lost. This could mean a new bill of over £5 billion just to run the assessments to clear the backlog of existing claimants (before any new claim for Personal Independence Payment is made).
Costing more, saving less and repeating Universal Credit failures: classic Iain Duncan Smith. It’s time for David Cameron to get a grip on the chaos which IDS has given rise to at the DWP. If Cameron fails to act there will be more chaos, delays and waste and it’ll take a Labour government to sort out the mess which bungling ministers have left.
Kate Green MP is shadow minister for disabled people
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
18 Responses to “As PIP fiasco joins IDS’ record of failure, it is time for PM to get a grip”
sarntcrip
left foot forward goes onto the right footon disability they will keep up ids’S HATE CAMPAIGN AGAINST TH MOST VULNERABLE,BLAIRITE,POSSIBLY UN-LABOUR DEFINITELY
WHATS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CAMERON AND MILLIBAND,ITS GETTING HARDER AND HARDER TO SEE AXELROD WAS CLEARLY A WASTE OF MONEY
Kyle Anderson
The whole point of them is to NOT HAVE A GRIP… Even the big guns who don’t want to are stepping forward tell these inept and odious misanthropes to get their shit sorted out… If you were caught out at this level back in the days when they actually had politicians, then you would be struck off and thats that… the fact that these Socially Retarded Wimps, Crooks, Misfits (there really isn’t a statesman among them…) and conniving bastards are just allowed to wreck everything they touch is a damning indictment on their plans for Social Cleansing… NO future Gov from whatever hue will EVER be able to reverse or even cope with what they have so maliciously inflicted on people, the underpinnings of the state and economy… I hope they all fucking DIE (Malice aforethought…)
Terry Craven
There is also major problems with bias at tribunal hearings. The constitution of tribunals is unfair, and unfortunately at times does not afford the appellant a fair trial as per Article 6. It seems to me that most doctors are more interested in the treatment the appellant has or hasn’t had than the actual effects of the illness and/or disability.
The tribunal needs to be balanced up by adding a third member, someone with a background in CAB or advice work. At the moment the two professional members, the judge and doctor are not held to account during deliberations. This is not conjecture I used to sit on ICB tribunals. I have no doubt the bias conduct I witnessed when sitting then is being repeated tenfold now because someone like me is not there to protect the appellant from prejudicial deliberations.