Stop Boris selling London

On Thursday protesters descended on City Hall to express their anger at Mayor Boris Johnson and over 20 UK councils participating in the MIPIM conference.

By William Ronan of the Radical Housing Network

Waking up at 6.30am to watch property firm employees in lycra eat croissants isn’t the most appetising start to a Wednesday morning.

These cyclists weren’t just going for a mid-week jaunt into the countryside, however, but are currently cycling to the infamously decadent MIPIM conference – the world’s largest real estate fair.

I joined over 100 residents and housing campaigners from across London to descend on City Hall on Thursday 6 March to express our anger at Mayor Boris Johnson and over 20 UK councils participating in the MIPIM conference, which takes place from 11 to 14 March in Cannes in the south of France. 

The fair has a €1,600 entry fee and brings together 20,000 investors, developers, local authorities, and banks, including Savilles, the British Property Federation and Goldman Sachs.

Boris and councillors will be meeting potential business partners in Cannes to sell public land and approve ‘regeneration’ plans for more hotels, offices, luxury housing, shopping centres in UK cities.

Walking around different boroughs in London it isn’t hard to spot the effects of contracts between councils and profit-hungry property developers as council housing stock is ripped down and replaced with shiny new luxury apartments.

The question is, where do all the old residents go?

Protest organisers, the Radical Housing Network, released two case studies last week on the relationship between Southwark council and developers ‘Lend Lease’, and also ‘Brent Housing Partnership’s’ regeneration of Kilburn council estates.

The reports explain a common story of services to council housing being run down, the residents forced to move out, and new housing complexes built with totally inadequate ‘affordable’ housing which means that the original residents cannot afford the new rent.

It’s deals that are done in Cannes by our ‘representatives’ that cement gentrification processes of neighbourhoods which mean that ordinary Londoners are being forced to the edges of the capital. The contracts between councils and developers are essentially part of a strategy to socially cleanse areas of London and make them more palatable for the high-earning middle class.

This is why members of tenants organisations, homeless groups, housing co-operatives, community food-growers and squatting campaigns came together on Thursday to declare that ‘London is not for sale’.

The day was filled with a host of activities from disrupting the media spectacle of MIPIM cyclists leaving for France, to hundreds of estate agent signs stickered to read ‘LONDON NOT for sale’ and made into a giant house at the steps of City Hall.

A ‘speak-out’ gave opportunity for people to share their stories of the housing crisis and difficulties to find secure, affordable housing in the UK capital. During which Liliana Dmitrovic of ‘People’s Republic of Southwark’ stated:

“We will not let our land, our cities, and our homes, be sold by politicians to line the pockets of developers. These are the individuals responsible for the housing crisis, and we believe that everyone deserves a decent home.”

As the day’s protests came to a close we were reminded that the demonstration will be part of protests across Europe in response to a call from the ‘European Action Coalition for the Right to Housing and the City’ including a ‘People’s Tribunal’ during the Cannes conference on Wednesday the 12 March.

With the new Radical Housing Network taking action on issues such as MIPIM which is relevant to housing needs across tenure and geography, the dots are being joined between lucrative ‘regeneration’ contracts, astronomical rent rises, and communities being displaced.

This is bad news for Boris, sell-out councils and developers. Especially as the last words on the mega-phone yesterday were, “This is just the beginning!”

Follow the Radical Housing Network on Twitter

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

4 Responses to “Stop Boris selling London”

  1. janlog

    They cram in wherever they can until they are forced out, Already we hear stupid people say (I heard this from the lips of an American audience member on BBC’s Question Time some months ago – “why should we [taxpayers] subsidise the rents of people who live in central London? I can’t afford to live there, why should they?”
    There are still little pockets of normalcy there. I used to work in Grays Inn Road at the ITN building and that was cheek by jowl with council flats – you would see and hear children being walked to the local school just around the corner. It was lovely to see an area that didn’t close at weekends and evenings.
    How long before they get forced out for more damned Hoorays?

  2. swatnan

    ITV have moved to the South bank, near Coin Street.

  3. walks

    Its called progress and times change. Your all happy for immigrants to swamp and destroy our country but as soon as it affects you lot your all up in arms. Pure hypocrites the lot of you.

  4. blarg1987

    There is a difference between progress and greed, progress would be more houses being built, and rents / prices falling for home owners / occupiers. Instead we have greed where state assets are sold to allow a small number of people to maximise the profit potential without filling the obligation of building housing for the majority of working people that are required to keep the city functoning.

Comments are closed.