5 policy responses to the Russian invasion of Ukraine

With Russia consolidating its position in Crimea, here's how the West can respond.

Russia forces are now in full control of Crimea, despite the fact that the Ukranian government says the Russian army has “no grounds” to be there. Events are moving quickly, but what is certain is that the West must respond to Russian aggression firmly while avoiding an all-out war between East and West.

David Cameron and Barack Obama have agreed that Russia must face “significant costs” if it does not change course over the Ukraine crisis. Here are five options for the West to consider:

1. An asset freeze

This would include visa restrictions, targeted bans on Russian officials and the freezing of Russian assets in the West. There is also scope for targeted sanctions against Russian corporations. Russia would veto any attempt to impose a travel ban on Russian officials through the UN, but there is no reason the UK and US could not act unilaterally tp punish the Russian government for its violation of Ukranian territory. As Mark Galeotti puts it, the most powerful weapon against the Kremlin is one targeting the elites on which it depends.

2. Suspend Russia from the G8

Removing Russia from the G8 tops the list of likely Western responses to the invasion of Crimea. In order to do this, however, the other seven members would need to band together to push Russia out. This probably wouldn’t be a problem – the G8 has already put out a statement saying it is suspending its participation in preparing for the summit in Sochi “until the environment comes back where the G-8 is able to have meaningful discussion”. The real question is whether it would have any discernable effect on Putin.

3. Enact trade sanctions against Russia

Trade between the US and Russia reached $40 billion last year – or 1 percent of total US trade, according to US Commerce Department data. Reducing trade with Russia would upset the Kremlin, which has recently been lobbying for greater trade agreements with the US. In order to be effective and send a clear message of displeasure to Moscow, sanctions against Russia could be combined with an economic package to assist the new government in Ukraine.

4. Bolster missile defence in Eastern Europe

The Obama administration has the option of reversing its decision to scrap missile defense plans for Eastern Europe, a decision made by President Obama as a way of trying to ‘reset’ US relations with the Kremlin. At the time Obama was trying to work with Russia to reduce nuclear-weapon stockpiles. There is very little reason to seek such cooperation now. American Senator John McCain appears to have a point when he says that the Obama administration was probably mistaken for believing that somehow there would be a reset with a guy who was a KGB colonel who always had ambitions to restore the Russian empire.

5. Bring Ukraine into NATO and speed up the process of Georgia joining the alliance

Since the late 1990s NATO has been reaching out to Russia to assuage the country’s fears that the defense alliance is a threat to the country. This has involved cooperation between the Kremlin and NATO, including the creation of a NATO-Russia Council which meets frequently to exchange concerns. Considering that the situation has now dramatically changed, there is little reason for continued cooperation with the Kremlin. The West should go further, however, and should give the new Ukranian government the choice of joining the alliance. It should also speed up the process of Georgia joining.

Like this article? Left Foot Forward relies on support from readers to sustain our progressive journalism. Can you become a supporter for £5 a month?

12 Responses to “5 policy responses to the Russian invasion of Ukraine”

  1. Michael

    Obama won’t do any of these because he wants to “transform America” into a 3rd rate power next to China and Russia. What is so hard to understand about this community organizer in chief that was raised by a Muslim father and a Communist mother?

  2. Dave Smith

    Thought this site was for left minded comrades? how can escalating the situation by placing super-capitalist USA missiles in the area ever be a left response? I can’t condone what Russia is doing but is it any different to the West invading Iraq or Afghanistan?

    Meeting aggression with aggression never solves problems, it always escalates them! we need dialogue. And don’t forget, this ‘revolution’ by a minority or Ukrainians has all the hallmarks of being backed by western capitalists.

  3. CarnVellan

    What is remotely left about this post? Nothing as far as I can see. Very shallow. It is a crisis. Be thoughtful and radical.

  4. Jim Denham

    I don’t necessarily agree with everything in the article, but appeasing Putin and the gangster-authoritarian capitalist Russia is certainly not a “left” response, despite the STWC’s latest (shameful) statement effectively supporting the invasion.

  5. Kryten2k35

    How about we let Russia do what the fuck it wants, and we stay out of another piece of shit bullshit conflict that has little to do with us. Where’s the Russian opposition when we’re invading Libya, Iraq, or Afghanistan? Why is it that only our nation and it’s big brother, are allowed to be bossy twats and decide who can do what in the international theatre?

  6. robertcp

    I agree. We can huff and puff but Russia will do what it wants!

  7. Paul Sands

    Steps 4 & 5 straight out of the Republican American play book

  8. Martin Mayer

    Oh come off it!  Russia hasn’t invaded Kiev! But it is securing it’s strategic base in Crimea.  Anyone who thinks you can take that from Russia without serious consequences is very naive.  Also we need to understand that the overthrow of the government in Kiev was not some fantastic democratic revolution but a right wing coup.  And it doesn’t have support across Ukraine. For much of Eastern and Southern Ukraine the change in government in Kiev is unacceptable and they ARE looking to Russia for help. We risk a civil war and partition in Ukraine but if we follow the lead of our Western leaders we’ll be rushing towards a third world war!   Don’t forget their agenda is to bring Ukraine and Georgia into NATO and extend neo liberalism to the post-Soviet sphere of influence. We need to keep calm and encourage a peaceful political settlement in Ukraine – the current political colour of the Kiev Government does not reflect that. 

    Martin Mayer

  9. blahblahblah

    Ah yes, not allowing St. Putin to control you is a right-wing coup. You are the one supporting Russia’s invasion, and the snipers who fired on protesters.


  10. Mark

    There was lots of opposition from Russia – they used their veto on the security council. Their argument has always been that there should no external interference in the internal affairs of sovereign countries. Turns out it is fine to do so when it is in their interests and in line with Tsar Vlad’s plans for the refounding of the Russian empire.

  11. klnmsu

    The coup that needs to take place is in Moscow. It is tough to deal with a world leader who was described by one leader he gets along with as not dealing in reality or something close to that. If true I would think it will only be a matter of time before Putin starts a major military confrontation with a country in NATO. It would still be difficult to stop a Russian army from running over Europe without turning to nuclear weapons
    . Most Americans are wondering why they should care about a military problem a world away because as usual people have short memories. The last world war started when an unstable leader thought he needed to take over his neighboring countries. But that is history right? Everthing is different now right? Leaders all know what the result would be of another world conflict right? But what is left out of this equation is the thought; history has a habit of repeating itself.

  12. Hein.Q

    1&3 will lead to another economic crisis. because Russia can limit natural gas supply to response. It’s harmful to EU but not USA, so EU will stop USA doing this.
    4&5 will lead to WW III directly. Ukraine means life or death to Russia. It’s not wise to do any kind of military confrontation with nuclear power like Russia.
    As for option 2, it just shows their attitude to the world and won’t cause any virtual confrontation. That’s truly what they want.

    So, I think Obama won’t do anything effective and just wait till the situation getting cool. Then he can use the actual situation that Ukraine has already been divided and negotiate with Russia. It will delay years of years until everyone accept the fact. Ukraine will be a second Korea.

    Western power is not strong enough to accept Ukraine. It’s a good chance to weaken Russia once and forever, but not in good time.

Leave a Reply