The following are five things the coalition has done which, in light of recent severe weather, it has been wise enough to shutup about.
There is significant evidence that climate change is a factor in the extreme weather that has hit the UK in recent months, the Met Office’s chief scientist Dame Julia Slingo has said.
Ms Slingo reflects a growing consensus among experts that Britain is likely to see more extreme weather as a result of climate change.
It is perhaps unsurprisingly then that in light of the recent flooding ministers have been trying to appear more concerned about climate change than they had previously.
Yet despite the newly-discovered piety of the government on climate change (last month David Cameron said he “suspected” the flooding was linked to climate change) its record in government on the issue has been woeful.
The following are five things the coalition has done which, in light of recent severe weather, it has been wise enough to shutup about:
1) Appointed Owen Paterson, a man who is unconvinced of man-made climate change, as environment minister
According to the Independent, in his first 14 months in office environment secretary Owen Paterson did not have a single briefing on climate change. Somewhat contradicting his avowed scepticism, Paterson has also myopically (and absurdly) suggested previously that climate change could provide opportunities for the UK, such as fewer people dying in cold winters. Presumably flooding isn’t one of these “opportunities”.
2) Dismissed energy efficiency policies as ‘green crap’
According to media reports back in November, David Cameron ordered aides to “get rid of all the green crap” that he believed was responsible for pushing up families’ energy costs. Downing Street denied the allegations, but it did not seem particularly far-fetched to suppose that the prime minister might have said such a thing. He was after all seemingly intent on blaming the rise in household energy bills on so-called ‘green levies’.
3) Opposed the 2013 Carbon Target
A proposal to include a target to decarbonise the UK’s electricity generation by 2030 was defeated in the House of Commons last year after the coalition whipped its MPs to vote against it. The measure would have obliged the government to introduce a target to decarbonise the power sector by 2030 to a level of 50 grams of carbon dioxide per kilowatt hour of electricity (i.e. 50gCO2/kWh) down from 486gCO2/kWh at present.
Initially supportive of the proposal, David Cameron backtracked after encountering vehement opposition from his chancellor George Osborne, who is against the setting of any carbon targets.
4) Publicly stated that it does not want to be at the forefront of tackling climate change
As the Guardian reported last year, the chancellor has publicly stated that he does not want Britain to be a world-leader in fighting climate change because of the potential ramifications on competitiveness in the international energy markets. This, despite saying in 2010 that “greening our economy can be a win-win solution”.
As a result of the chancellor’s comments Friends of the Earth accused Osborne of a “shameless lack of leadership”.
5) Tax breaks for polluting industries and cuts to renewable budgets
In recent years George Osborne has gifted billions of pounds in tax cuts to the oil and gas industry to incentivise drilling off Britain’s coastline. At the same time, the chancellor has presided over the loss of thousands of green jobs, cut the budget for onshore wind farms by 10 per cent, stripped the Green Investment Bank of the ability to borrow and lend and has done a U-turn on airport expansion, with plans back on the table to increase airport capacity in the South East.
As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.
We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.