This is what a real 'Benefits Street' might look like.
On Monday Channel 4 aired the first episode of a new programme called Benefits Street. The show is set on a street where 90 per cent of the people living there apparently claim some form of benefit.
Here is a short clip so you get the gist:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jr8jGiIp2MI
The clip is short but I’m sure you get the picture: the residents of ‘Benefits Street’ (actually James Turner Street in Birmingham) live as they do because they don’t have jobs. And they don’t have jobs because they can’t be bothered to get the, Or, so the programme seems to suggest.
That is, after all, what benefits are for isn’t it, the unemployed?
The point the producers of Benefits Street appear to have missed, however, is that the vast majority of people on benefits are about as far removed from some of the characters featured in the programme as it is possible to be.
Not only in the sense that they are ordinary people rather than troublemakers, but in that they aren’t unemployed at all.
Were it a real Benefits Street, it might look something like this (click to zoom):
(HT: New Economics Foundation)
In other words, the vast majority of people ‘on benefits’ are elderly. Pensions make up a whopping 42.3 per cent of the welfare bill. It’s pensioners who predominate on Benefits Street, not drug-addled, foul mouthed yobs.
The next largest recipients of welfare are those who do work but who are on low incomes. George Osborne’s ‘strivers’, in other words, who make up 20.8 per cent of the welfare budget through things like working tax credits.
The working poor are an increasingly common feature of 21st century Britain. In December the Joseph Rowntree Foundation revealed that over half of the 13 million people living in poverty are actually from working families.
Next up are the sick and disabled, who constitute 15.5 per cent of the welfare budget. They do sometimes take drugs; but it’s usually for pain relief, rather than to get high.
At the end of the street we finally reach the unemployed, who make up just 2.6 per cent of total welfare spending. Not 90 per cent, not even 10 per cent; but 2 per cent. That’s it. It isn’t so much a street as a potting shed in the garden of a small terraced house at the end of the row.
Looking again at my terrible photoshop mock up of a ‘Benefits Street’ it’s clear that, like the producers of the programme, I’ve created a woefully inaccurate representation of the true state of affairs. A real ‘Benefits Street’ would look a lot more like this:
Look at them. I hope it makes you as angry as it does me. Bloody scroungers.
52 Responses to “What a real ‘Benefits Street’ would look like”
Valerie Arnold
They are not scroungers, they have worked all their life, they have paid into the system.
David Sanderson
A single unemployed person receives £71.50 a week, do people really think someone is living it up on a tenner a day? Some people actually hate the unemployed just how stupid or vindictive (or possibly both) do you have to be to resent someone with nothing and who is no threat to anyone?
David Sanderson
My local MP claimed a £75 kettle on expenses, more than a lot of people are expected to live on for a week.
John Smith
Thanks for the apology Probably as good as it gets
Brian Gardner
But James Bloodworth’s comment clearly doesnt say its a fiction that such people exist. Is that what you are really trying to claim? His comment uses actual facts, It doesn’t extrapolate from a single unrepresentative street. Do you avoid pubs because a helicopter landed on one last month? If you read his comment he is specifically highlighting that it is not a “significant subsection”.
The left did not create the underclass. Neither did Cameron, Osborne or Thatcher. Its capitalism that needs a poor unemployed section of the population to keep wages down.It helps keep profits up. Sparky probably is so deluded he thinks that he is different from those on the so-called “Benefit Street” . But he’s not – he’s just the same. Most humans around the world share this: we are members of the working class, whether we like it or not, whether we work or not.