Want to make the case for immigration? Then stop talking about money

The public aren't worried only about the economic impact of immigration.

The debate around immigration has become rather toxic of late, but also rather strange. Almost every day there is a story in the papers linking migrants from the EU to ‘benefit tourism’, and yet there is scant evidence supporting the claim that it constitutes a significant problem.

According to the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), 16.6 per cent of working age UK nationals claimed benefits in 2012 compared to 6.6 per cent of working age non-UK nationals. As Ranjit Sidhu recently wrote for Left Foot Forward, if the rest of us behaved like migrants the government would have significantly more money in its coffers.

And yet public attitudes remain stubbornly hostile to immigration, despite the mountain of evidence demonstrating its economic benefits. People who see migration as a problem outweigh those who see it as opportunity by a whopping 64 to 29 per cent. Surprisingly perhaps, 40 per cent of Labour supporters think immigration is bad for the economy compared with 36 per cent who believe it is good.

There is ample evidence available with which to counteract myths like these. Migrants are good for the economy and put more into the collective pot than they take out. If it matters, migrants also tend, on average, to be better educated than their British counterparts.

So why the persistence of myths around benefit tourism? Are we, the British, really so dull as to miss what is staring us in the faceeven if, as Bertie Wooster put it, it is “handed to us on a skewer with tartar sauce”? Have the public really been ‘brainwashed by Tory propaganda’, as some suggest?

On the Daily Politics last Wednesday, I overheard shadow business secretary Chuka Ummuna implying that complaints about immigration were really code for economic concerns. In other words, it’s all about the economy, stupid.

This is a common theme, particularly on the left. When people say they are concerned about immigration we assume they are really expressing in code concern about their jobs, their income or their mortgage.

Certainly there are reasons why those at the bottom of the labour market may be concerned about wages, and these concerns should not be dismissed lightly. However I suspect that blaming it all on ‘the economy’ is to get things at least partly wrong. Concerns about the economic impact of immigration may just as likely be rationalisations for other, more basic fears about the pace of social and cultural change.

That’s certainly what the University of Oxford’s Migration Observatory believes. It says that cultural concerns better explain negative attitudes towards migration than a person’s economic position.

Of course, when people talk about ‘culture’ they aren’t referring to the usual tabloid tropes about Muslims trying to ‘ban’ Christmas, but rather to fears about the pace of change in their communities. They’re not concerned about the colour of a person’s skin but rather worried that one day they will be the only person on the bus who is speaking English.

It is, in essence, about whether England feels like England. And that’s not the England of Enoch Powell or the English Defence League, but may just as well be the England of George Orwell, who wrote that “there is something distinctive and recognizable in English civilization. It is a culture as individual as that of Spain”.

However fashionable it may be to pretend otherwise, for most people this remains the case.

It’s not enough to dismiss this as xenophobia, although a small proportion of it probably is. According to the latest British Social Attitudes Survey, 60 per cent of those who came to Britain in the 1960s and 70s want to see a cut in immigration to the UK. Thirty nine percent of non-UK born white respondents earning £75,000 per year reported preferences for ‘a lot’ less migration.

Some might see this as a wish by some to kick away the drawbridge once they’re safely on the ship. But it may simply relate to why many came to Britain in the first place: they were attracted by social and cultural traditions which they now (unduly, in my opinion) worry are disappearing.

A first step in assuaging these fears would be to listen to those espousing them, rather than simply reeling off GDP figures or accusing people of being ‘brainwashed’ by the tabloids. It isn’t always about the economy, and those who only see things as lines on a graph risk looking stupid themselves if they don’t engage with other worries about immigration.

For those of us who do see immigration as a positive thing, the failure to engage with the public on the issue could ultimately have egregious consequences.

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

29 Responses to “Want to make the case for immigration? Then stop talking about money”

  1. wattys123

    Labour hate the white working class and if elected will continue to ethnically cleanse them.

  2. Stephen

    Do those on the left think about the economic effect on the countries were migrants come from? Perhaps anti-immigration advocates forget the moral argument, but then morality was never their forte was it? All very ironical.

  3. tryttinngg

    “It is a culture as individual as that of Spain” – not exactly Orwell at his finest there given how many areas of Spain view themselves as separate nations. Didn’t Orwell write ‘homage to Catalonia’, after all?

    and: “A first step in assuaging these fears would be to listen to those espousing them” – but you haven’t actually done that here. Instead you’ve decided what they might believe, such as people being “worried that one day they will be the only person on the bus who is speaking English” – with no evidence that this is anyone’s actual fear, nor why it should be such a bad thing (am pretty sure public transport in the East End of London in the early C20th was largely non-Anglophone for instance), and used that invented worry as a stick to bash ‘the left’ with, pretending Orwell is on your side.

    Plus ca change.

  4. Sparky

    Have you noticed that for years all the Left did was accuse people who didn’t want more immigration of being racist? It was the universal smear it applied to everyone. These pages bristled with the trendy, white, middle class, Islington socialists wringing their hands with fake guilt over the plight of minorities and shouting down anyone else with shrill, hectoring, self-righteous accusations of racism.

    Now that the tide of public opinion has patently turned against immigration en-masse, and the accusations of racism simply won’t wash anymore, the Left has tried to soften its approach with these voter-friendly, touchy-feely articles about ‘listening to people’s concerns’ and ‘engaging with the public to assauge their fears’.

    The Left love immigration because immigrants are more likely to vote for left wing parties. That’s the real truth. That’s why Labour went about systematically changing society when it got into power, something that no-one expected and few people wanted.

    And yes, who wants to be the only person on the bus speaking English? I don’t. Who wants their child to be the only white child in their class. I don’t. Who wants their girlfriend to be called a slut in the street because she’s wearing a short skirt? I don’t.

    The kind of people who write these articles never have to engage with the realities of mass immigration because they don’t live in Tower Hamlets, they live in Twickenham. They don’t experience the reality of falling wages in the painting and decorating industry in Birmingham, because they work as as a ‘political blogger’ or ‘think-tank policy researcher’ in Bloomsbury.

  5. tryttinngg

    “Who wants their child to be the only white child in their class. I don’t.” – wow, almost immediate racism in the comments to this article, what a surprise.

Comments are closed.