European commissioner is right: we can not let populism win ahead of facts on immigration

Vivane Reding, vice-president of the European commission, stated in a web chat last night that in the UK there is a perception of an "invasion of foreigners" coming to the UK to "steal jobs".

Vivane Reding, vice-president of the European commission, stated in a web chat last night that in the UK there is a perception of an “invasion of foreigners” coming to the UK to “steal jobs”.

“this supposed invasion of foreigners coming to the UK and stealing the jobs and stealing the social security and the health money……The fact and figures, and we all know this, show it is simply not true….I am mostly frustrated about the political leaders because what is leadership if you just try with populistic movements and populistic speech to gain votes?”

Indeed, if you were to take an overview of the UK’s press today then it would appear that all of our economic woes are due to ‘benefit scroungers’ and immigrants.

Ms Reading is right to point out that we have fallen into scapegoating immigrants, whipped up by populists such as Nigel Farage and the tabloids.

A quick look at some of the myths behind immigration illustrates as much:

‘They are taking our jobs’

This is a cry that has rung through the ages, be it the 1960s, 70s, 80s, 90s and 00s. The historical data is undebatable that immigration helps creates jobs; the idea that employment is a zero-sum game of continual limited jobs either for immigrants or UK born workers is simply wrong.

An example of this is that in 2012 over 66 per cent of European immigration came from core EU community countries like Germany and France, providing skilled staff that are more “likely to be in higher managerial or professional occupations and they also earn 7.6 per cent (£2,035) on average more than UK workers”

In other words, the high skilled workers we need to be competitive in the world market.

To lose these young, motivated workers would be an economic disaster. As The Centre of Business Research states:

 “Tighter immigration controls will result in a loss of 2 per cent from GDP by 2050, £60billion in real terms. And without migrants from the EU helping to off-set the UK’s ageing population, government borrowing would be 0.5% higher.”

We can also see the longitudinal effects of this immigration. Again, the evidence is positive: a 30-year study found that although migrants often experienced downward mobility to begin with:

“Caribbean, Black African, Indian and Chinese young people were more likely to have found professional or managerial jobs than their white, non-migrant counterparts….Upward mobility among children from minority ethnic groups was due to their educational achievements. This suggested that migrant parents often encouraged and motivated their children to gain good qualifications”.

‘They are all on benefits’

This is counterfactual to the above evidence on jobs and not supported by data from Ian Duncan Smith’s own Department of Work and Pensions (DWP), which says:

“16.6 per cent of working age UK nationals were claiming a DWP working age benefit compared to 6.6 per cent of working age non-UK nationals.”

Let’s put this another way and look at ourselves through the eyes of the immigrant. If we in the UK behaved as non-UK nationals do, the DWP working payments in benefits would be cut by over half – by over £30 billion. Over the long-term migrants are also helping to pay for our ageing population and pensions (by far the largest DWP cost).

‘Education and Health Care is at breaking point’

There is no denying that communities which have had an increase in immigration are under stress, but to blame this on the immigrants is to miss the point. Those who have come to Britain are working and paying taxes, therefore it is the government’s job to provide the extra funding to the individual schools and hospitals in that area.

This failure of government policy was highlighted by the funding (£1.5 billion) being diverted to Academy Schools “where extra places weren’t needed“.

‘Our communities are breaking down’

There is a sense of moral panic about this and this was illustrated when a Migration Observation study asked if people thought the UK had a “very big problem” with immigration. It than asked whether their own community had a “very big problem” with immigration.

Over five times as many people (38 per cent to 7 per cent) thought the UK generally had a problem but not their own community. This shows the effect the media has on those in areas that have very little immigration but who see it as a national problem.

Never has the language of our politicians been so one sided.

19 Responses to “European commissioner is right: we can not let populism win ahead of facts on immigration”

  1. Dave Roberts

    There is immigration and immigration. In the excellent ” The Diversity Illusion” Ed West takes apart the arguments presented here. Excluding things like education, health and other services free at the point of delivery Poles have a take up rate of less than one per cent of benefits. With Somalis it’s more than seventy per cent.

    The other factor is that Poles, as with other Eastern European groups, can easily go home, a couple of hours on a cheap flight or ten or so on an even cheaper bus and they are back where they came from and many do commute working for months here and then going home. With other groups there is only a one way traffic.

    Many groups didn’t fit well into the countries they came from. Roma were routinely discriminated against in the former Communist countries and it is they who make up a large part of the Eastern European diaspora. A look at the groups arriving on the shores of Italy and Spain show that they are very often traumatised people totally lacking the basics skills to fit into modern European society never mind marketable skills that are needed in an increasingly complex Europe.

    A Chinese person with an MBA, an Iranian brain surgeon or a couple of Bulgarian women that I know who have started a cleaning business are not typical of the millions that the writer of this article, whoever he is, seem to think would benefit this country. Most are or will be a burden on the state.

  2. joames

    If by ‘populism’ you mean, ‘the majority of people with common sense seeing the simple truth for what it is’…

    Then , I’m afraid you are wrong

  3. JC

    Depends on whose facts and whose populism. If you want to be entirely partisan and refuse to debate, then it’s always my facts and your populism.

  4. Ranjit Sidhu

    Thanks Joames, my point completely: The evidence must be listened to, even in this current mass hysteria. Thanks for the comment

  5. Ranjit Sidhu

    Dear Dave, My concern is you are getting your information from Ed West book. I would recommend reading the independent articles mentioned up, in particular the DWP report and the The Centre of Business Research – I cannot take seriously any book that says little innovation apart from food has come from immigration and that all London Schools have suffered because of it. Thanks for your comment. Ranjit

Comments are closed.