I’m a leftie but I don’t want to destroy the Daily Mail – I want it to prosper

Paris Lees writes on why she's protesting outside the Daily Mail's offices today, but why she wants to Mail to prosper, rather than close.

Paris Lees is a writer, broadcaster and campaigner, who works to raise awareness of transgender people. She is both Channel 4 and Radio’s first trans woman presenter and has written for the Guardian, Telegraph, Independent and VICE, and has a monthly column with Gay Times magazine

The following is based on a speech she will give to protesters today.

Today I will, for the second time this year, protest outside the Daily Mail’s London headquarters. I wish to express my feelings about one of Britain’s most well read papers, which also own one of the most popular websites on the planet.

I visit MailOnline.com sometimes, though I’ve never bought the paper. I know family members who do and I’ve read copies handed out for free on trains and planes. It’s the only paper I know that makes the Sun look friendly and many people I know hate it. You might not read it but some people do and it affects the way they perceive the rest of us.

A few weeks ago I lunched with Robin Esser, executive managing editor of the Daily Mail. He agreed to meet me and another trans person and their father as part of a project I work with called All About Trans. I’ve been involved in ‘reactivism’ in the past, complaining and protesting, and there’s definitely a time and place for it – today, for example.

But I prefer, when possible, to focus on positive engagement. Perhaps it’s the optimist in me, or the fool, but I like to believe that if you stick journalists in a room with the people they are prone to mock and tell lies about, they’ll probably stop doing it.

As part of All About Trans, I also met with Tom Peck last summer, who writes for the Independent and used to write for the Mail. During the course of 2013 Tom has gone from making jokes about trans people having broad shoulders to criticizing the BBC for referring to Wikileaks collaborator and transgender woman Chelsea Manning with male pronouns. He attributes his enlightenment to All About Trans, and he’s not the only one.

I want to change the way the media treats vulnerable minorities like transgender people. This frequently puts me in an awkward position as a journalist, because how are you supposed to critique the very media you are trying to become part of? And I thought twice about protesting today because, honestly, I’d love to write for the Mail. I’m a writer and I write to be read. People read the Mail.

I think most journalists, if they were honest, would probably be quite chuffed to get a commission from the Mail, so the only thing that surprised me about Mehdi Hasan this week was his hypocrisy. There’s no shame in wanting to write for a one of Britain’s oldest dailies.

But it’s because I’d like to write for the Mail that I am protesting today. I believe in good journalism. I don’t want to destroy the Mail – to lose any British newspaper would, in my opinion, be a national tragedy. I want to see a press that is fair and open and valued by the public it serves. As Sunder Katwala pointed out in the New Statesman yesterday, it was pressure from the Mail that led to greater closure and justice for the family of Stephen Lawrence. I would like to see more of that and less of the Jan Moir bullshit, personally.

Don’t think that Mail’s top brass can possibly ignore this demonstration and the outpouring of public condemnation this week. Change is possible – and, if the industry and this paper in particular is to survive, and attract younger readers from modern, diverse Britain – it is also necessary.

Finally, though I’m pleased the attack on Ed Milliband’s father has sparked a debate about the Mail’s role in our public life, let’s not forget all the little people it has bullied over the years too. What the Mail has done to the Milliband family it has also done to some of the most vulnerable members of our society.

In March I demonstrated, here, against Richard Littlejohn’s harassment of Lucy Meadows, a schoolteacher who took her own life following months of unwanted press intrusion. Littlejohn questioned whether Meadows was ‘in the right job’, and it’s precisely this threat of being gratuitously monstered by the press that stops many trans people living full and meaningful lives.

Well, enough is enough. The British public should not fear the press. The press, its editors and media barons should fear the public and pushing us too far. We’ve been pushed and pushed and pushed and today we are pushing back! Solidarity!

Please do check out the positive work we’re doing at AllAboutTrans.org.uk.

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

15 Responses to “I’m a leftie but I don’t want to destroy the Daily Mail – I want it to prosper”

  1. Mr Spock

    As long as the British news papers exist in their current form under their current system of ownership things wont change. They behave they way they do because they are used as a tool to form and shape opinion and they bully people they way they do because it suits those who own everything) to make us jealous and fearful of each other in order to make us blame each other instead of them when they steal from us to line their already bulging pockets. You can talk about enlightening journalist all you want, their ediitors wont let them produce the kind of stoories you want because it doesnt fit the papers agenda.
    The only solution is to have news papers that cannot be controlled or owned by any one interest or person or group of people, by oligarchs or press barons or corporations, but by the journalists and the unions and the readers and be accountable to the public for what they say.

  2. AnnaBanana

    Well thanks for throwing the rest of us under a bus because you want a writing job. Seriously, thanks, It means a lot.

  3. Martin Jennerson

    Excuse me, who is really “bullying” others here? The BBC is by far the biggest broadcaster in this country, with the widest reach, and has consistently supported a system of discourse in which whole swathes of people have their points-of-view delegitimised, on cursory grounds. If you don’t agree with climate change theory, you are a denier and a bad person, for example. How dare the left throw such a deeply pathetic hissy fit at the first sign that their discourse might be similarly limited. Especially after your ridiculous ideas have caused so much upset to the people of this country during the last 14 years. This includes flooding the country with migrants, upsetting millions in the process, and not allowing any criticism of this policy through using the BBC to label any protest as “racist”. This includes multiple witch-hunts, including hounding people and creating international incidents after they had called an Indian woman “poppadum lady” on a boring reality show. Take a long hard look at yourselves, pathetic hypocrites.

  4. majentah

    My thoughts exactly.

  5. Joanne Constable

    Martin Jennerson, if you’d watched the boring reality show you would know that the ‘poppadum’ comment was the least sinister bullying of Shilpa Shetty. Three young women , two of whom should have known better, ganged up on her and made jokes about her accent and ethnicity. If they can’t behave in a civil manner they should stay out of the public eye or take the consequences. Throughout the incident Ms Shetty remained polite and dignified going on to win the boring reality show. It was a valuable lesson for these young women who went on to apologise and consider how they behave toward others. Popular culture is very powerful and public opinion was their behaviour was indefensible. Then you, who I doubt watched the show, came along and decided the aggressors were victims. Pathetic hissy fit indeed!

Comments are closed.