This surrender to the tobacco industry will result in more young people and children smoking

The government today announced that it will not be introducing legislation on standardised packaging for cigarettes and other tobacco products.

Martin Dockrell is director of policy and research at Action on Smoking and Health (Ash)

The government today announced that it will not be introducing legislation on standardised packaging for cigarettes and other tobacco products.

This timid surrender to the tobacco industry will simply lead to more young people and children starting to smoke.

More than 200,000 people under the age of 16 start to smoke every year, or abour 570 every day.

But the fundamental case for standardised packaging remains simple and clearly justified by the evidence. Smoking tobacco is a damaging addiction. Cigarettes are the only legal products sold in the UK that kills their consumers when used exactly as the manufacturer intends.

No company should be allowed to promote such a product through advertising and marketing. Children, and the most vulnerable groups of children in particular, need protection from the tobacco industry’s never ending search for new addicts. Tobacco packaging should be made as unattractive as possible.

The evidence backing standard packs was clearly set out in the Department of Health’s (DH) own consultation document. A systematic review of peer reviewed studies found that plain standard packaging is less attractive especially to young people, improves the effectiveness of health warnings, reduces mistaken beliefs that some brands are ‘safer’ than others and is therefore likely to reduce smoking uptake amongst children and young people.

The majority of the public support standardised packaging: a poll on the issue by YouGov, conducted for ASH in February 2013 found that 64 per cent of adults in Great Britain were in favour of the proposal.

Since the close of the public consultation, Australia has implemented standard packs and Ireland has pledged to do so next year. The Scottish, Welsh and Northern Ireland governments have all stated their support for the policy.

The tobacco industry has run a well-funded and grossly misleading campaign against standard packs in the UK and around the world.

In the UK alone, just one of the big four tobacco multinationals, Japan Tobacco International, is spending £2 million on the campaign. A series of advertisements from JTI opposing standardised packs breached the UK advertising code, according to the Advertising Standards Authority.

They cannot be allowed to buy their way out of appropriate regulation of their products.

So we won’t accept that this is the end of the story. If the government is too frightened to act, then Parliament should decide the issue on a free vote, as it did over the introduction of smokefree workplaces in 2006.

We will be working on a finding a way in which this can happen as soon as possible, and we will keep Left Foot Forward readers informed of how we get on.

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

2 Responses to “This surrender to the tobacco industry will result in more young people and children smoking”

  1. Greg Burrows

    At Last a bit of sense, 12 million people smoke in the Uk, I hope a lot of them will vote UKIP, so we can amend the smoking ban, and put second hand smoke under the control of the HSE, as the HSE can not produce epidemiological evidence that second hand smoke is significantly harmful, why, because there is not any evidence, (Google HSE OC 255/15 read article 9), this is why the smoking ban was not brought in by the HSE, it was stated at the time the ban was put in place, that it was to protect barworkers, and was underhandedly brought in under the Health act 2006, as no proof was needed in the Health act 2006, that SHS is significantly harmful, this dreconion smoking ban has caused social isolation for many, and cost around a hundred thousand jobs in the hospitality industry, and for what benefit. Greg Burrows UKIP 2010 General election, PPC Calder valley.

  2. Robert McKensie

    A government that is not forcing in Stupid rules excellent they have my vote if they keep on like this.

Comments are closed.