Look Left: The Comprehensive Spending Review, fracking and (yet more) rape apologism

James Bloodworth looks back at the week’s politics, including our progressive, regressive and evidence of the week.

To receive Look Left in your inbox before it appears on the website, sign up to the Left Foot Forward email service

• In his Comprehensive Spending Review on Wednesday, the chancellor George Osborne announced £11.5 billion pounds worth of cuts – a result of the UK economic recovery being the slowest for 100 years.

In detailing where the axe will fall in 2015/16, the chancellor announced a 1 per cent cap on public sector pay rises, various departmental cuts (excluding the NHS, schools and foreign aid), as well as a welfare cap (excluding the state pension).

The chancellor also announced that jobseekers will face new requirements to get benefits. Non-English speaking claimants will be required to learn English or risk cuts to payments.

At Left Foot Forward this week we looked at why George Osborne is still having to make cuts (clue: the economy isn’t growing), as well as at the new changes to the requirements for jobseekers. Sarah Bickerstaffe of IPPR argued that the health ringfence is not enough to protect the NHS, and Carl Packman looked at the potential bonanza for payday lenders on the back of the benefit changes.

• The Treasury announced today that the British Geological Survey (BGS) has found 1300trn cubic feet worth of shale gas trapped in the rocks beneath Lancashire.

There is now believed to be as much as 1,300 trillion cubic feet at the Bowland site in Lancashire – much more than previously thought.

Greenpeace argued that using a geological survey to pre-announce a shale gas driven boom could risk “putting politics before scientific or economic reality”.

• In a spiteful article for the Daily Mail this week, columnist Liz Jones wrote that the pop star Rihanna was a “toxic role model” for young fans because she gloried in “drugs, guns and sleaze”.

The killer line came further down the piece, however, where Jones said that Rihanna’s fashion sense “surely invites rape at worst, disrespect at least”.

If this sounds familiar, that’s because it’s rape apologism – the stuff that usually comes out of the mouths of…rapists.

Progressive of the Week:

Finance ministers in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland have urged Whitehall to take advantage of current low interest rates by borrowing to increase investment in infrastructure projects.

Slamming the “downgraded” chancellor, the position of the devolved governments is starkly at odds with that of chancellor George Osborne.

Welsh finance minister Jane Hutt said the “evidence was clear” that “well chosen public infrastructure investments can have both short term and, more importantly, sustained, long-term benefits for the economy”.

Regressive of the week:

Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer – two US far-right activists – have been banned from the UK by home secretary Theresa May after a concerted campaign to stop the two addressing an English Defence League rally on Saturday.

The letter from the home secretary says: “After careful consideration, she [the Home Secretary] personally directed that you should be excluded from the United Kingdom on the grounds that your presence here is not conducive to the public good”.

While the two may be odious, there were concerns at Left Foot Forward that a ban might be counterproductive, and turn Geller and Spencer into free speech “martyrs”.

Evidence of the Week:

Official emissions figures released this week by Transport for London (TfL) showed that the worst polluted areas in London are overwhelmingly the the poorest parts of the city.

The Mayor’s own research has shown that poor air quality is London’s silent killer, causing over 4,000 premature deaths each year. In some London boroughs, as many as eight per cent of deaths are due to poor air quality.

In the face of this crisis, however, Boris has consistently dithered and made it a problem his eventual successor will have to tackle.

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

3 Responses to “Look Left: The Comprehensive Spending Review, fracking and (yet more) rape apologism”

  1. treborc1

    And the wimp has anyone heard anything from Miliband, or is he having meeting with Blair first, will he back the seven day waiting time for people on JSA, we will know once he has checked out the Polls, well not really polls it’s the comment section of the Daily Mail.

    Labour is now the new Tory Lite a good name for the once socialist party, think it goes down well.
    Vote Miliband Tory lite.

  2. ed conduit

    Osborne’s cut of £11.5 billion may INCREASE public borrowing by £4 billion. The multiplier effect (Keynes) of state expenditure is more like 1.5 than the 0.5 estimated by the coalition. This means, for example, that the lost spending power of local government workers more than offsets the savings on their salaries. Pettifor and Chick, drawing on the Tokyo IMF meeting, argue that the continued failure of the Osborne plan is because cutting state expenditure cuts the economy as whole.

  3. Juteman

    As I can’t say this in Gaelic without losing my benefits, i’ll say it in English.
    Could Westminster be preparing the ground?
    Ok, those selfish Jocks have fecked off with their oil, but we have plenty of gas.
    Please international money markets, listen to me. Please. Pretty plese.

Comments are closed.