Boycotting Israel: Moderate voices drowned out by hard-liners

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is one of the most complex and difficult in modern history, with two competing narratives attempting to describe an extraordinary shared history. With polarisation on the issue endemic, there is limited space for moderates in the center to advocate a resolution that delivers justice for Palestinians, security for Israelis and peaceful co-existence for both.

By Alex Bjarnason, organiser and communications Officer for Trade Union Friends of Israel

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is one of the most complex and difficult in modern history, with two competing narratives attempting to describe an extraordinary shared history.

With polarisation on the issue endemic, there is limited space for moderates in the center to advocate a resolution that delivers justice for Palestinians, security for Israelis and peaceful co-existence for both.

There is clearly considerable anger about the lack of progress in delivering Palestinian statehood, Israel’s occupation of the West Bank and settlement building, the blockade of Gaza, and stasis in the peace process.

Such anger is exploited by activists devoted to making Israel a pariah state, completely isolated internationally as a pre-cursor to its collapse and the liberation of all British Mandate Palestine, with no interest in peace or a two-state solution.

Such views have become worryingly common in the British trade union movement, with many trade unions voting to support the Palestinian Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) campaign.

BDS seeks a complete economic, political and social boycott of Israel, with divestment from companies that have links to Israel and sanctions to punish the country.

Rather than proposing punitive measures against Israelis living in West Bank settlements and companies that operate there, BDS targets all Israelis, including those with progressive values who want an end to the occupation, the formation of a Palestinian state and who continue to pressure the Israeli government to take more moderate positions.

I’m often asked what motivates these activists, beyond the reaction to genuine injustice that angers us all. Many belong to far-left fringe groups and view the State of Israel as a colonial experiment supported by American imperial ambitions, based on occupying stolen Palestinian land, a case study of everything wrong with the modern world that must be resisted.

More cynically, they recognise the Israeli-Palestinian conflict provides an irresistible opportunity to recruit for political groups that are dying because the next generation have lost interest in Marxist  revolutionary politics.

The great success of the BDS campaign in British trade unions has been to draw popular support from grassroots, moderate members who agree with a proposed motion but wouldn’t support the full litany of BDS policies.

Their support derives from compassion for Palestinians who face severe hardships and anger at the policies of an Israeli government who appear harsh and cruel, with the BDS activists excelling in presenting information with a cynical mix of half-truth and spin that pushes sensible trade unionists into agreeing with less-progressive, hard-line positions.

The challenge in the future is to reach out more effectively to moderates who recognise the right of both Palestinian and Israelis to live in peace as part of a two-state solution, and find a more productive way to channel their anger that can help improve the lives of Palestinians and make peaceful co-existence between the two people become a reality.

In particular, we need to work on building stronger links between moderates in the UK and progressives in Israel and Palestine who recognise the urgency of supporting the peace process and realise a better-future will be based on friendship, tolerance and co-existence.

7 Responses to “Boycotting Israel: Moderate voices drowned out by hard-liners”

  1. mightymark

    Particularly right to emphasize both the anti American angle and also that of recruitment to dying Marxist groupuscules. Both cynical and opportunist.

  2. abebird

    Stop wiping with your dry tears! You know that Muslims don’t accept non-Muslims entities in their “Dahr El-Islam” (area of peace and Allah acceptance). For that the Muslims are the peace deniers and they are devoted to annihilate the Jews in the land of Israel. The fact that among Jews you can find some lunatic retarded people as Azmon, doesn’t make his case right. Atzmon lost his conscience and sold his soul the Nazi devil, which he makes love with.

    Palestinian Authority Representative in Lebanon Abbas Zaki Supports Anti-Israeli Attacks
    and States: We Act According to the (Arafat and Abu Abbas 1974) Phased Plan (for the destruction of the Zionist entity). Once We Get Jerusalem, We Will Move On to Drive Israelis Out of All of Palestine. And that man sat the closest to Abu Abbas, in last September UN general assembly.

    http://www.memritv.org/clip/en/1738.htm

    and again:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ol8FCf-wq_o

    Nabil Shaath, Head of Foreign Relations in Fatah: We Will Never Accept the
    “Two-States for Two Peoples” Solution to the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict.

    http://www.memritv.org/clip/en/3046.htm

    Hamas Cleric Wael Al-Zarad Calls for the Annihilation of Jews and States: If Each Arab Spat on the Jews, They Would Drown in Arab Spit.

    http://www.memritv.org/clip/en/1722.htm

    Deputy Speaker of Hamas Parliament Ahmad Bahr: We Will Sweep the Siblings of Pigs and Apes out of Our Land.

    http://www.memritv.org/clip/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/3146.htm

    Good criticism of Arabs by an Arab

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XFqPn55_rNQ

Comments are closed.