Sticking Cameron’s cabinet on £53 a week would in itself be a stunt. But in the age of rich public school boys being parachuted into safe seats without having any experience of life outside Westminster - the struggle for jobs and daily budgets far more demanding than anything Osborne has had to get his head around – it might just be a necessary wakeup call.
After Iain Duncan Smith claimed he could live on £53 a week in benefits instead of his £1,581 a week post-tax salary, he was challenged by an online petition to put his money where his mouth is.
Within a day the petition attracted more than 200,000 signatures. It has now secured over 300,000 signatures.
Petitions are hardly the strongest form of political protest, and this is something of a stunt, but my name is on that list because I think there is a worrying disconnect between rich politicians and the real world.
If Iain Duncan Smith were to take the £53 a week challenge, I wouldn’t expect to see a road to Damascus, or for this die hard dyed in the wool Tory to abandon his long-held ideological commitment to neo-liberalism. But at least it would show the man whose bedroom tax is to make 660,000 people living in social housing £728 per year worse off the everyday effect of his policies.
It is little surprise that a cabinet dominated by millionaires has consistently acted in the interests of its class with expensive tax giveaways to society’s richest individuals and the world’s biggest corporations, while clawing back money from Britain’s poorest. It’s basic self-interest, which displays a tragic lack of empathy for those less fortunate.
Sticking Cameron’s cabinet on £53 a week would in itself be a stunt. But in the age of rich public school boys being parachuted into safe seats without having any experience of life outside Westminster – the struggle for jobs and daily budgets far more demanding than anything Osborne has had to get his head around – it might just be a necessary wakeup call.
You can sign the petition calling for Iain Duncan Smith to live on £53 a week here.
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
25 Responses to “How about we stick Cameron’s entire cabinet on £53 a week”
Anthony Masters
It does highlight that disconnect quite well, particularly when the wealth of both front-benches are brought up. Stunts are not overtly harmful, but too many in succession can dull public interest. They are also particularly helpful either. The petition itself is grabbing the headlines, but have not necessarily focussed around the benefit reforms themselves. It can back-fire too: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/9968031/IDS-challenged-to-live-on-53-a-week-by-man-who-gets-156.html
Salman Shaheen
Quite right, the wealth of the opposition bench is equally important and apart from a few honourable examples, I think Labour is every bit as guilty of promoting the cult of careerist politicians.
Paul Madley
Damn right. Here in Manchester people are raving about getting a female MP. That seems more important than the fact she went straight from Uni to working for Labour HQ…
Anthony Masters
The number of MPs that have flowed from university to a think-tank or affiliated organisation, to becoming a Special Adviser, to standing for Parliament is utterly incredible.
factsandfigures
article could have linked http://www.parliament.uk/about/mps-and-lords/members/pay-mps/