If the coalition is to meet its spending targets it will have to make further cuts to departmental budgets.
Public sector job losses could be significantly more than one million, according to a report published yesterday by the Institute for Fiscal Studies.
Due to the government’s failure to hit its savings targets, job losses in the public sector could be 300,000 higher by the end of 2017/18 than predicted, according to the IFS’s annual analysis of the government’s spending plans.
Within the IFS’s report, however, was also contained the prediction that, if the government continues to ring-fence the NHS budget, overseas aid and schools, spending cuts will need to be significantly more severe if the coalition is to meet the targets of its fiscal consolidation plan.
As things stand, just to keep his current savings plan on track, George Osborne will need to make much larger cuts to departmental budgets than he originally intended.
As we can see from the graphs below, the bar on the left represents what the government intends to cut while the bar on the right represents what the government will need to cut unless it reconsiders its policy of ring-fencing select budgets or increases government revenue through tax rises.
As the report phrases it:
“If such further cuts to departmental spending are not possible without a decline in the quality or quantity of public services that is unacceptable to politicians or to voters, then higher borrowing, further tax increases or social security spending cuts – perhaps after the next general election – must be on the cards.”
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
132 Responses to “More spending cuts on the way if coalition is to meet savings targets”
Newsbot9
Yes yes, you hate the poor and have no idea about them, so you condemn then on the basis of you seeing someone from the middle class buying a luxury, right.
Keep on stealing food from the poor, it must make you feel big!
Newsbot9
No, your fire is burning people, and is dangerous. And the diseased wood was long since removed, you’re no tree surgeon, you’re trying to land the tree on society’s house.
Absolutely_Passionate
@Newsbot9:disqus
I never stole food from the poor, in fact I pay large amounts of tax which goes towards providing them with food in the UK and abroad.
What do you do for the poor?
Newsbot9
Yes yes, after boasting about how you hate the poor, you now claim to pay a large amount of tax. It’s not, even remotely, believable – you might pay some VAT, but… (Also, the Government is NOT feeding the poor here properly, starvation is a massive and increasing issue, so it fails on that as well!)
And I work to stop your kind of theft of food from the poor.
Absolutely_Passionate
What would you say if the house belonged to a local authority fat cat who earns £258,000 a year + chauffeur driven car + generous bonus + £1.75million pension fund?