Campaigns: Ensuring MPs stick to their 2030 Carbon Target promises

Social media is increasingly being used by activists to hold politicians to promises they have made in the past. This time those MPs who promised to back the 2013 Carbon Target amendment to the Energy Bill are being encouraged to stick to their promises via Twitter.

We’re all aware of the power Twitter has in terms of breaking news. While the idea of ‘citizen journalism’ is sometimes overblown, the social media boom has transformed traditional journalism beyond all recognition.

The potential to harness the medium for campaigning has also gained traction in recent years.

A grassroots campaign that caught the eye of Left Foot Forward this week was one started by Guy Shrubsole, a campaigner for Friends of the Earth, who is using Twitter to try to ensure politicians stick to their promises on the 2030 Carbon Target.

A cross-party campaign aims to introduce a 2030 decarbonisation target to the Energy Bill, which would require the secretary of state to set a 2030 decarbonisation target by 1 April 2014.

Labour has said it will support the amendment, and last year the Lib Dem conference also voted in favour.

The government has opposed the idea, however, after a compromise agreement was last year between energy and climate change secretary Ed Davey and chancellor George Osborne saw a decision on whether or not to adopt the target deferred until 2016.

Cross party support for the amendment remains, however, and it was a Conservative MP, Tim Yeo who, along with Labour MP Barry Gardiner, tabled the amendment.

Lib Dem and Conservative MPs are now being whipped to oppose the amendment on the back of the government’s decision, but in the past a number of coalition MPs have promised to back it.

Guy has now taken to Twitter to ensure that those politicians who previously pledged their support stick to their promises.

“The 2030 target is vital because it’s the cheapest way to decarbonise the economy and create the certainty investors need to create jobs,” Guy told Left Foot Forward.

Nick Molho of the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) agreed.

“If you’re going to invest you will need to know what the markets look like in 2020. It really is an own goal not to support it.”

The MPs who have previously promised to back the amendment are:

David Amess (Con), Graham Evans (Con), Zac Goldsmith (Con), John Hemming (LibDem), Thomas Brake (LibDem), Tessa Munt (LibDem), Mark Hunter (LibDem), Ian Swales (LibDem), David Ward (LibDem), Andrew George (LibDem), Adrian Sanders (LibDem), Annette Brooke (LibDem), Julian Huppert (LibDem).

And here is Guy:

[blackbirdpie url=”″]

[blackbirdpie url=”″]

[blackbirdpie url=”″]

The vote on the 2030 Carbon Target amendment could take place as early as the beginning of March.

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

5 Responses to “Campaigns: Ensuring MPs stick to their 2030 Carbon Target promises”

  1. voteukiporwearefinished

    If this madness went ahead we could count the extra pensioner deaths in thousands.

  2. Francis Joseph Wells

    from where did you draw that bogus statistic? Are you even aware of the licensing obligations on Utilities to protect the vulnerable?

  3. PullTheOtherOne

    Quite right. Cold temperatures and high electricity prices killing old people? Next they’ll be telling us mass immigration drives down wages and disadvantages the poorest Britons in society.

  4. Mick

    Sounds a bit like bunkum anyway, especially as China’s carbon emissions can teach us a thing or two about pollution. Then the Guardian rubs the salt in by blaming the UK’s 10% carbon footprint rise on imports anyway. Another cue for greenies to bitch.

    After Labour increased outsourcing, guaranteeing us an import economy, the Left still seem to tell us: We can’t do anything right. Got it. All those dustbin fines and punishing green taxes for nothing then.

    And now we’re told China’s pollution doesn’t matter anyway and that we are responsible AGAIN, this time for the Yellow Peril’s own reforms.

    Under the Left, the country can never win.

    This guy causes climate change with own smug hot air:

  5. Mick

    I see where this may be going. With 20,000 pensioner deaths in a single winter, old people often have to choose between heating and eating. A plucky handful refuse to pay their council taxes and end up in the dock and the papers for their defiance.

    All that zealous green taxation could at least be partly refunded, with the rest spent on the army or the old folks. Both are in need, both in trouble all the way through Labour’s last terms. (And let’s not forget Labour’s legacy of child poverty as well.)


Comments are closed.