Post-Colonial arrogance: UK refuses to aid India in equitable growth

The government's decision to stop aid to India is the latest instalment in a history of ignoring India.

 

David Taylor is chair of the Labour Campaign for International Development (LCID)

The decision on Friday to withdraw UK aid to India beyond 2015 reveals a Secretary of State for International Development who is more concerned with the whims of her own MPs and the right-wing press than the wants of one third of the world’s poorest people.

It once again highlights the weak leadership, low ambition and poor vision that has come to characterise this government’s approach to development.

Friday also saw the OECD announce India, already a $1 trillion economy, may surpass the US over the long term – but they also predicted that, on current trends, the average Indian will still be four times poorer than the average Briton a full 50 years from now.

The Indian government must do more to share the proceeds of the country’s rapid growth. The governing Indian National Congress may not be our sister party but they are progressives and deserve credit for their Right to Education Act, their Rural Employment Guarantee social protection programme and for drawing up plans for a universal health care system based on our own NHS.

But to reduce India’s staggering inequality and ensure universal access for all, these programmes must be properly financed and comprehensively implemented.

Social Democrat-run Brazil demonstrates what can be achieved when a proper taxation system is established – their Bolsa Família social protection programme has cut the number of Brazilians living in poverty in half.

The Indian government must take the lead – but international partners including Britain could help provide useful technical assistance.

Whilst it is welcome Justine Greening is proposing such assistance, their values may get in the way of what is needed. Indian efforts to increase their tax base will hardly be helped by George Osborne’s decision to water down the UK’s anti-tax haven rules in this year’s budget – something ActionAid estimates will cost developing countries as much as £4 billion a year.

And their aversion to the public sector has seen them halve our funding for budget sector support – the very aid that helps countries build their own health and education systems by giving them the funds required to recruit and retain teachers, doctors and nurses – and one of their first acts in government was to axe Labour’s proposal for a Centre for Progressive Health Care Financing that would have supported poor countries to achieve universal access to health care.

Worst of all, as a panel of experts commissioned by Indian prime minister Dr Manmohan Singh has been drawing up proposals for a universal health care system modelled specifically on our own NHS, DFID India has been nowhere to be seen.

As the mother of all universal health care systems, there could surely be no better moment for Britain to offer technical expertise – and our government’s continued unwillingness to help is truly reprehensible.

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

22 Responses to “Post-Colonial arrogance: UK refuses to aid India in equitable growth”

  1. Colin McCulloch

    As much as I loathe the abject the poverty there, I can’t really agree that India is our problem, particularly when they insist on spending their new wealth on nuclear weapons, a massive standing army and space exploration. India already has the wealth to implement socially progressive measures; it chooses to spend its money otherwise.

  2. JGH

    Sorry – where is the post-colonial arrogance bit?! I’d rather give money to countries that really have no resources to fund programmes themselves rather than aspiring super powers that buy aircraft carriers and choose not to feed their hungry.

  3. Garry Burns

    Post-Colonial arrogance??? That could be levelled at yourselves for assuming its our responsibility to support a country thats wealthier our own. Should we be giving aid to every country where the average person is less well off than the average Briton? Or do you have an out of date parochial attitude to ex-empire countries?

    We should support those countries who need it, not indulge in parental concern for our ‘imperial children’. India is old enough and grown up now to deal with its own problems.

  4. Brown Jedi

    Doesn’t Britain have any responsibility to its former colonies, whom she merrily plundered economically and raped cultural? Admittedly, India is a wealthier country, but it also several times more populous country.

  5. Brown Jedi

    I really wish British had this attitude when they ruled India. Then, they would have not demanded 50-60% taxes in the middle of a famine. They even went ahead and taxed sea-salt. India does need money to feed its hungry, it already has grains in surplus. It needs efficient infrastructure to isolated village.

Comments are closed.