Lab 2012: Miliband’s One Nation vision takes fight to Cameron and challenges Labour


One Nation is absolutely the right framing for Ed Miliband. In a single phrase the Labour leader has set out a positive vision for Britain, projected a division with the Tories on their own turf and set out a challenge to the Labour Party.

Miliband set out his vision, aping Disraeli, as:

“A vision of Britain where patriotism, loyalty, dedication to the common cause courses through the veins of all and nobody feels left out, it was a vision of Britain coming together to overcome the challenges we face.”

This is clearer and more positive than anything he’s said before and builds on the optimism in Britain following the summer Olympics. It will help address head on poll findings that voters think he lacks a clear sense of the Britain he wants to create.

By borrowing language more closely associated with the Tories, Miliband sought to make himself the heir to a popular tradition of Conservative thought in a similar way to Cameron audaciously painting himself as the “heir to Blair”. In doing so Miliband set out a clear dividing line with the Tories in a subtler way than Gordon Brown, his former boss, could have managed.

This dividing line, surely the theme of the next two-and-a-half-years, is that the government is out of touch and unable to understand the plight of millions of families up and down the country who are seeing energy, petrol and transport prices increase while their salaries stay flat or fall. Osborne’s 50p tax cut has given him the perfect example to support this narrative even if Miliband may get a little flak for claiming all millionaires will get a £40,000 tax cut (it will only be those who earn a million).

Finally, the One Nation theme sets out a challenge to the Labour party. Miliband was explicit Labour had to be the party of the south as well as the north, the party of the private as well as the public sector, and not representative of a single sectional group. That is pretty transparent code a “core vote strategy” is not what he sees as the path to power. His appeal directly to the people who voted for Cameron last time around shows he understands Labour cannot win a majority on disaffected Lib Dems alone.

The only criticism that can be levelled at Miliband is he didn’t address the fiscal crisis Labour will inherit because of the double-dip recession – but his shadow chancellor touched on this yesterday as he himself has done in other speeches.

He will need to come back to this as the election approaches, but if he does that and can make the One Nation theme sing on the doorstep, he may find himself on the steps of No 10.

Like this article? Left Foot Forward relies on support from readers to sustain our progressive journalism. Can you become a supporter for £5 a month?

20 Responses to “Lab 2012: Miliband’s One Nation vision takes fight to Cameron and challenges Labour”

  1. treborc1

    One nation, some how I do not think it’s going to get us going, we are not at war, we are not fighting the Germans, we are being asked by a Millionaire to tighten our belts when these MP’s are earning a wage and living off expenses. While many of the people on the lower earning scale are being told your not going to have wages rises. yes one nation , sadly not all united.

    Worse again Bankers are raking it in again, yes yes he will tax them, pity then they did not do it before.

  2. All Thats Left

    The beauty of this speech was that it showed the Labour leader brining the centre ground to him, rather than whorishly seeking out the centre ground. The ‘one nation party,’ was extremely clever, but, more importantly it effectively articulated the growing feeling of disaffection and alienation that is felt by so many. I analyse the speech in the following piece:

  3. treborc1

    Liam Byrne has outlined the need to “reinvent social security for
    modern times” as he signalled the party intends to make savings in the welfare budget if it returns to power in 2015.
    to the growing resentment of benefit claimants by some sections of
    society, the shadow work and pensions secretary said he believed the
    fact that social security no longer enjoyed “widespread support” was
    linked to the fact it did not offer the same level of security as it
    once did.
    He said in an era in which “jobs for life” had gone,
    the system needed to work differently to reflect the fact that different
    things were needed from social security, with a “much bigger push” to
    get people back into work, new investment in areas such as childcare,
    and being “much smarter” about how the system set up to help disabled
    people worked.

    New labour is dead long live New labour…..

  4. Selohesra

    I can’t believe he has the cheek to keep peddling the lie that Cameron is writing cheque for £40,000 to all millionaires. Does he really think Brown & co were writing cheques for £80,000 to the same people while they were in power and keeping top rate at 40% for all but a month of their 13 year misrule?

  5. Eddy Boyband

    I wonder what Edwards going to spend his 40 grand on ?

  6. All Thats Left

    Funny how everyone seems to have been impressed with Ed Miliband’s speech apart from the Blairite wing of the Labour Party! We analyse some of the carping in the following piece:

  7. Newsbot9

    There’s a mistake in the article title. It should read “fights alongside” rather than ”

    takes fight to”. It’s an endorsement of the austerity and destruction of the country’s social infrastructure, and cuts which by design cannot end,

  8. Newsbot9

    Ah yes, if you’re a centralist who’s rejected the left, I’m sure you’re cheering his plan to ensure that the social class divisions are to be hardened, and that the poor and disabled will continue to be punished for existing.

    It’s clear he’s talking about even more punishment for unemployed people who don’t jump into the first minimum wage job, looks like attacking the minimum wage for disabled people too…

  9. Newsbot9

    True, he’s writing a lot more to them with the corporation tax cuts.

  10. Selohesra

    Ah that’s right change the subject Botty. Not only is he disingenuous on the tax rate facts he also seems to confuse assets with income in determining who is a millionaire which might explain why Brown & co f’d up the economy so much. I’m prepared to believe Chucka is too thick to know the difference but not Ed – like him or not (and I don’t) I think he is actually quite smart – which leaves the only conclusion being that he is fundamentally dishonest.

  11. Newsbot9

    Wah, did I point out an inconvenient fact again?

    You keep up the myth that a 0.6% average deficit is a disaster (it’s not ideal, sure), when your Tories are using death cycle economics ON PURPOSE.

    You’re the fundamentally dishonest one, you can’t admit you’re trying to destroy the economy. And Ed’s signed on to YOUR plan. So basically you’re whining.

  12. Selohesra

    Ah that’s right Botty – change the subject again. Woop – there look I can include silly noises in my comments too.

    If anything Dave has signed onto Ed’s plan as we have not had any serious attempt to make the necessary cuts.

    Basically you are whining – but why can’t you tell me whether you think Ed is a liar or a fool? (you are clearly not a fan either)

  13. Newsbot9

    Ah yes, you don’t think that death-cycle economics and the current death rate is sufficient, you want machine guns in the streets. *sigh*

    And he’s moving towards YOUR views, so are you a liar or a fool yourself? That answers your question…

  14. Selohesra

    Ah yes – ducks the question again – same old hypocritical Botty

  15. Newsbot9

    I’ve answered the question. You just don’t like the answer so you accuse me of lying.

  16. Selohesra

    You clearly do not know the difference between ‘responding’ to the question and ‘answering’ the question – I deduce from that that you are a bit thick.

  17. Newsbot9

    AH right, so you have answered – you consider yourself and Ed fools. Thanks for that!

  18. Selohesra

    Ah yes – so now you’ve confirmed my deduction. Thank you.

    I’ll make this my last comment for now as I have real work to do now for real money – something you in your Poly world you would not understand

  19. Newsbot9

    So basically you knew all along and you were grandstanding. Thanks for wasting my time, typical.

    Ah yes, you have to run off to destroy more jobs and lower the GDP. Typical 1%er, who has to deride someone who does a wide range of jobs (this week, I’ve been teaching, am building a website for a film professional and will be doing a bit of game system design over the weekend…) as not understanding how the “real” economy works, since I create and not destroy value.

    (PS, City University isn’t a poly)

  20. Steven

    Is Liam Byrne thick or just merely dim? You CAN’T get people back into work if the jobs AREN’T THERE and they AREN’T. We have AT LEAST 2.5 MILLION unemployed (in reality many more) chasing under 500,000 vacancies. THAT is the problem. When is the Labour Party going to stop repeating the moronic lies of rags like the Daily Moron?

Leave a Reply