With the early removal of Occupy, the established church is safe from anyone in Occupy’s tent becoming the next Martin Luther
.
This morning, we learn that Standard Chartered bank have signed a confession note that they laundered $250 billion.
Given that Standard Chartered’s CEO told shareholders it was only $14 million, that’s an accounting change that would embarrass Bernie Madoff, and there’s not been a single News International-style police dawn raid to arrest any board director.
Instead, the shareholders have paid off the board’s accusers to the tune of $350 million.
There’s now no-one left in UK banking that isn’t covered in scandal. HSBC has already admitted that they laundered gobs of drug money.
And I hope I’m not alone in asking, in the case of Barclays lowering its LIBOR levels two days before its £7 billion capital raising: can someone with inside information manipulate a price in the direction the price will move once the information is announced and it not be investigated?
But again, in both of these cases, the shareholder covered the sins of the board members, £290 million from Barclays’ shareholders and HSBC’s shareholders are expected to pay almost $1 billion.
While it may concern that banks are more willing to pay fines than cover the coalition’s bank levy, we have to take our hats off to the prescient churchwardens of St Paul’s. Anticipating the lack of judicial action, they removed Occupy before all this guiltless activity by the banks.
The trend was already there: in January, the FSA’s judgment of RBS collapse that not a single non-executive director of said institution deserved a reprimand. The churchwardens were correct to anticipate this would be the prevailing trend.
Hannah Arendt once wrote that “people change their morals like table manners” and the behaviour of shareholders writing blank cheques for the CEOs is clearly the latest example. Moreover, churchwardens of an established church have learned the lessons of history.
• European parliament could penalise those involved in Libor rate fixing scandals 25 Jul 2012
• Inside the world of the bankers… This is why we need a full inquiry 4 Jul 2012
• Occupy have provoked the intelligent debate so lacking in mainstream politics 29 Feb 2012
Isn’t the present judicial stance towards bank directors a secular revival of Catholic indulgences for the St Paul’s City board member flock? In this modern secular version, however, the shareholders pay: it’s too medieval for sinful board members to be out of pocket.
And with the early removal of Occupy, the established church is safe from anyone in Occupy’s tent becoming the next Martin Luther.
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
26 Responses to “Lack of bank arrests vindicates St Paul’s decision to remove Occupy”
Selohesra
So Botty admits due process should not apply to ‘my lot’ whatever he means by that that just about sums you up – pursecuting people whether for their occupation, religion, sexuality or race is wrong. But I wouldn’t expect you to accept that.
Newsbot9
You have argued that it does not apply, period.
When I DARE apply that to your class, you throw your toys out the pram. And of course you want criminal enterprises and purveys of hatred to be protected.
I’m very pleased to admit that I believe in prosecuting criminals.
Selohesra
So NOW you want to START A class WAR – you DON’T EVEN knoW wHaT clasS I am – its revealing about you that you want to attack people for accident of birth – YoUD have fitteD IN WELL with dR Goebels
Newsbot9
As usual, you try and blame everyone else for your sins.
You’re a 1%er or quisling. You started what you see as a class war, in the 1970’s. You’re currently winning, and it’s making life for the 99% increasingly intolerable.
I don’t want to, unlike you, starve anyone. I want people to pay their fair share of tax, and receive a fair share of the profits from their labour.
For this you call me a Nazi. At this point, I’m happy calling you scum.
Selohesra
The analogy to a Nazi was for the simple reason that you are happy to see groups you dislike arrested without first going to the trouble of identifying which if any have actually committed crimes