Six EU countries support intervention in Syria – why isn’t the UK one of them?

Brexit & Foreign Policy

Tory-led Britain continues to 'sit on the fence' when the war criminals of Syria should be sitting in the dock

E-mail-sign-up Donate

 

.

Richard Howitt MEP is Labour’s spokesperson on foreign affairs in the European Parliament and Labour Euro MP for the East of England

David Cameron and William Hague like to talk tough about holding to account those responsible for the bloodshed in Syria, but what they won’t tell you is that they have been instrumental in blocking Assad and his henchmen being prosecuted by the International Criminal Court (ICC).

assadThis week in the European parliament, I castigated Britain as one of a group of EU governments who ensured referring Syria to the ICC was removed from the draft conclusions of the last EU meeting of Foreign Affairs ministers, and did so again by withdrawing a resolution the EU was due to submit to the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva and due to be voted today.

I told MEPs our government’s inaction flies in the face of the evidence of torture by beating, electrocution, burning, hanging, sexual humiliation and mock execution, published by Human Rights Watch this very week.

Six EU countries have stepped forward to back the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights to actively authorise ICC intervention. Yet Tory-led Britain has refused to do so.

Instead the Tory MEP Spokesperson replied to my speech saying it was “not expedient” for the UK to back this call, whilst the current EU presidency seeking to justify the refuseniks said they “didn’t want to cause controversy at this time”.

As the chair of the European Parliament’s delegation to the UN’s International Criminal Court review conference, I acknowledge the timing of a referral must be sensitive to efforts towards conflict-resolution.

 

See also:

• Syria: Chilling scale of Assad’s state-sponsored torture revealed 3 Jul 2012

• ‘The UN just arrive after the massacres and film the corpses… They are just watching us die’ 7 Jun 2012

• “They were murdered one by one… executed with a bullet to the head or a knife to the throat” 30 May 2012

• We can’t sit back and allow more massacres: It’s time for military action in Syria 28 May 2012

• Syria: When will the West act? 2 Jan 2012

 

However I told Parliament that delay on Syria had not left space for a negotiated solution to succeed, but a vacuum in which violations have intensified and the death toll to have reached 16,000.

Turkey and the United States have stepped into the breach in Geneva and it remains to be seen in the vote today, whether Tory-led Britain continues to ‘sit on the fence’ when the war criminals of Syria should be sitting in the dock.

 

Sign-up to our weekly email • Donate to Left Foot Forward

No related posts.

24 Responses to “Six EU countries support intervention in Syria – why isn’t the UK one of them?”

  1. Anonymous

    What is your sensible alternative?

  2. Anonymous

    Limited intervention. There is a moral imperative to act against slaughter, if it’s Gadaffi, Assad or ATOS.

  3. Jubilation in Libya as elections conclude | Left Foot Forward

    […] See also: • Six EU countries support intervention in Syria – why isn’t the UK one of them? 6 Jul […]

  4. The Samosa » Archive » “It’s time to go, Cameron warns Assad

    […] also:  • Six EU countries support intervention in Syria – why isn’t the UK one of them? 6 Jul […]

Comments are closed.