The left shouldn’t celebrate if Osborne is dropped, it could just benefit the Tories

Cameron has a viable and potentially winning game plan once again. Labour must have a better one.

E-mail-sign-up Donate


George Osborne is for the chop but his economic policy will remain in place. < osborne-sadThat is the lesson to be inferred from the sudden spate of newspaper articles announcing his imminent departure.

If it were simply a matter of the odd piece in the Observer or the Guardian, one could dismiss it as wishful thinking, but when the Mail on Sunday goes for the jugular, something serious is happening.

Here’s a possible Tory scenario: after further bad news from the IMF and others about the economy and a possible downgrading of Britain’s AAA bond status before September, Osborne swaps places with William Hague who becomes the new chancellor.

Despite some cosmetic adjustments, there is no U-turn on economic policy which, if anything, becomes harsher.

Cameron’s move is designed to pave the way for a general election and to placate an increasingly powerful Tory right which wants to kill off the Coalition because the Lib-Dems are threatening to block the reduction in Commons’ seats.

Cameron also figures that if the Coalition does fall, non-posh-boy Hague is a better bet than young Gideon—both to help fight off a leadership contest and to win a general election.

This change in tactics is crucially important as it becomes abundantly clear that Osborne’s original promise—to deliver reasonable economic growth in time for a 2015 general election— will not be met.

Besides, at a snap election in 2013, the Tories will still be able to argue that Britain is still a ‘safe haven’, that austerity remains necessary for recovery—but that a coalition government, particularly one given to squabbling endlessly about Lords reform, has been tried and found wanting.

Throw in some extra goodies such as the promise to hold an immediate referendum on Europe and Cameron might find such a scenario irresistible.


See also:

Tory MP: Osborne has “obviously made a mistake” and “he should apologise to Balls” 10 July 2012

Leslie: ‘Frenzied Osborne throwing around false allegations and demeaning his office’ 4 Jul 2012

Once again, hypocritical, deregulation-loving Osborne attacks Labour over bank regulation 3 Jul 2012


If this is indeed a likely outcome, Labour would do well to shift up a gear or two. For one thing, it cannot continue to promise the same cuts as the Tories, but with a slight change in timetable. It needs to start shouting from the rooftops that cuts don’t work, and be prepared to put forward an aggressive policy of domestic economic expansion designed to create jobs.

Labour needs to say loud and clear that it is prepared to reverse many Tory cuts—-particularly those that affect the elderly, cuts that are destroying the NHS and damaging Britain’s educational system.

Europe provides further evidence of the absurdity of self-inflicted austerity. With house prices rising again, Labour needs to promise affordable housing. In a country which has just experienced the worse summer flooding on record, Labour needs to sign up for a new deal to combat climate change.

Whether Ed Miliband is on a roll at PMQs may be of interest to the chattering classes, but the ordinary voter doesn’t give a damn for Parliament, much less for Parliamentary reform. The man or woman in the street wants the opposition to put across an opposition message, and the message must be not just that Labour feels your pain but that it has a programme for immediate improvement.

The fact that the Tories have been sliding downhill ever since the April budget fiasco is not yet a reason to celebrate.

Cameron has a viable and potentially winning game plan once again. Labour must have a better one.


Sign-up to our weekly email • Donate to Left Foot Forward

Like this article? Sign up to Left Foot Forward's weekday email for the latest progressive news and comment - and support campaigning journalism by making a donation today.