Pickles’ Plan to deal with “120,000 trouble families” in a tailspin

Eric Pickles' proposals to deal with 'troubled families' is a rehash of a New Labour policy, but served on bed of dubious spin kicking the poor and public sector workers.

E-mail-sign-up Donate

 

.

Local government minister Eric Pickles, must have been delighted at the thought of his new policy announcement, which manages to attack two sets of Tory hate-figures at once – the unemployed and social workers.

He told the Mail on Sunday yesterday:

“Sometimes when you meet some families, they have got  the language, they are fluent in social work.’

Mr Pickles said it was time to level blame at 120,000 ‘troubled families’ said to be at the root of high amounts of crime and social disorder.

“Sometimes we have run away from categorising, stigmatising, laying blame,…

“Come artificial boom, come bust; come tough times, come good times, these folks have been completely immune from it. It has been the easiest thing for authorities to say, “Here’s some money, go away.”

As Nushra Mansuri, professional officer of the British Association of Social Workers, the figure of 120,000 is years out of date, and the latest in a series of mixed messages from government.

“Is the government saying that being poor is a crime?

This figure of 120,000 ‘problem families’ being bandied about is cobbled together from research that was conducted 8 years ago, and was based on families having 5 out of 7 characteristics, including no parent in work, and having a low income.

The government also needs to decide whether there is a link between deprivation and crime or not. At the time of last summer’s riots, David Cameron said: “These riots were not about poverty. That insults the millions of people who, whatever the hardship, would never dream of making others suffer like this.”

In fact Jonathan Portes, Director of NIESR, over at the Not the Treasury View blog can’t see how the criteria for troubled families means they are necessarily anti-social. He writes:

“Under government criteria, a troubled family is one that meets five out of seven criteria: having a low income, no one in the family who is working, poor housing, parents who have no qualifications, where the mother has a mental health problem, one parent has a long-standing illness or disability, and where the family is unable to afford basics, including food and clothes.

“What instantly leaps out from this list? It is that none of these criteria, in themselves, have anything at all to do with disruption, irresponsibility, or crime. Drug addiction and alcohol abuse are also absent.”


See also:

Pickles needs a friend 4 Oct 2011

How hard is it for families to keep their heads above water 5 July 2011

Pickles letter to Cameron reveals inconvenient truth on benefits cap 3 July 2011


While it may be bad enough accusing those who can’t afford basics as being ‘immune’ from economic turmoil,  Portes suspects the dark arts of spin at hand:

“When we look at the Department’s written guidance on the “Troubled Families Programme”, here, the plot thickens even further. Here’s the very first paragraph:

‘These families are characterised by there being no adult in the family working, children not being in school and family members being involved in crime and anti-social behaviour.’

“These criteria are (almost) completely different.  Yet the number is exactly the same!   It seems less than plausible that there are 120,000 families who meet the original criteria, and exactly the same number who meet the new, more appropriate ones.”
Having asked the Department for Work and Pensions questions clarifying the coincidence, Portes has received no answer. He concludes:
“It is difficult to conclude anything except that the Department, and the government, have become hung up on the 120,000 number despite the fact that they are well aware that it is now completely discredited.”
Meanwhile, although Pickles presents himself as a break from recent ‘politically correct’ policies, it turns out his proposal is a £450 million fund to incentivise councils to ‘deal’ with these families that uses, according to the Daily Mail:
“methods, adopted nationally by the last Labour government, [that] involve high costs for each family targeted.”
So what we ultimately have is a rehash of a New Labour policy, but served on bed of  dubious spin kicking the poor and public sector workers. How delightful!

 


Sign-up to our weekly email • Donate to Left Foot Forward

Like this article? Sign up to Left Foot Forward's weekday email for the latest progressive news and comment - and support campaigning journalism by making a donation today. 

31 Responses to “Pickles’ Plan to deal with “120,000 trouble families” in a tailspin”

  1. Martin Steel

    Pickles' Plan to deal with '120,000 trouble families' in a tailspin: http://t.co/89BWmbvm writes @danielelton

  2. Foxy52

    Pickles' Plan to deal with '120,000 trouble families' in a tailspin: http://t.co/89BWmbvm writes @danielelton

  3. Shifting Grounds

    Pickles' Plan to deal with '120,000 trouble families' in a tailspin: http://t.co/89BWmbvm writes @danielelton

  4. BASW

    RT @leftfootfwd: Pickles' Plan to deal with '120,000 trouble families' in a tailspin http://t.co/XuERW8XK

  5. leftlinks

    Left Foot Forward – Pickles’ Plan to deal with ’120,000 trouble families’ in a tailspin http://t.co/8Q8GJL4G

  6. Socialist Health Asn

    Pickles' Plan to deal with '120,000 trouble families' in a tailspin: http://t.co/89BWmbvm writes @danielelton

  7. Chris Paul

    Pickles' Plan to deal with '120,000 trouble families' in a tailspin: http://t.co/89BWmbvm writes @danielelton

  8. Alistair Sinclair

    Pickles' Plan to deal with '120,000 trouble families' in a tailspin: http://t.co/89BWmbvm writes @danielelton

  9. BevR

    RT @leftfootfwd: Pickles' Plan to deal with '120,000 trouble families' in a tailspin http://t.co/zebzpu34

  10. Brian Tomkinson

    Pickles' Plan to deal with '120,000 trouble families' in a tailspin: http://t.co/89BWmbvm writes @danielelton

  11. Declan Gaffney

    RT @leftfootfwd: Pickles' Plan to deal with "120,000 trouble families" in a tailspin http://t.co/g998cleK

  12. Glenys Thornton

    Pickles' Plan to deal with '120,000 trouble families' in a tailspin: http://t.co/89BWmbvm writes @danielelton

  13. Anthony Adshead

    RT @leftfootfwd: Pickles' Plan to deal with "120,000 trouble families" in a tailspin http://t.co/rc6iMPsj

  14. Robert Clement-Evans

    RT @leftfootfwd: Pickles' Plan to deal with "120,000 trouble families" in a tailspin http://t.co/mo9OppA1

  15. clarebelz

    Mnn

    “Under government criteria, a troubled family is one that meets five out of seven criteria: having a low income, no one in the family who is working, poor housing, parents who have no qualifications, where the mother has a mental health problem, one parent has a long-standing illness or disability, and where the family is unable to afford basics, including food and clothes.”

    So it seems that you are deemed a troubled family now basically because you’re poor?

    Been in the above situation many times of my life, and neither my children or me went around vandalising, mugging, robbing, or caused any distress to any of our neighbours. Poverty does not necessarily mean that your family is akin to a local crime wave!

    And the solution this government has to tackle poverty? Yes, you guessed it, to further impoverish people. Well, if you do that then you are going to push people into crime because parents will do almost anything to feed their kids, though that’s no excuse to break the law of course.

    I’ve written elsewhere about the utter hopelessness I felt as a young married mother the last time the cons were in power under Thatcher, when my [ex] husband was working at the time and receiving a very low wage. The cons had a really bright idea then: scrap housing benefit for those on low incomes; sell of the water, which was part of our rent and became a separate bill; introduce the poll tax.

    The affect on our family having to find this extra money was catastrophic; we could afford only one meal a day; no heating; electricity kept being cut off; no clothes or shoes (mine eventually had holes in); no money to replace anything or repair it; no money for the bus fares either to school or shopping; no money for basic personal items that we both needed; constantly running out of soap powder, soap, loo rolls, tooth past, everything you can imagine; chilblains on our hands and feet throughout winter; constant chest infections and so on.

    The loss of income would probably be around £50 per week in today’s money. With all the cuts and caps many families will end up suffering like we did, and in this day and age it is unacceptable.

    People either need a living wage, or a subsidy that enables them to live. If the government is not prepared to bring that about, we will all suffer, and ‘troubled’ families will increase.

  16. Anonymous

    “Is the government saying that being poor is a crime?”

    YES! You just noticed?

  17. Anonymous

    All? No, the Tories and the their corporate friends will do fine.
    They’re all in it together, after all.

  18. BevR

    RT @leftfootfwd: Pickles' Plan to deal with "120,000 trouble families" in a tailspin http://t.co/zebzpu34

  19. Mark Smithson

    RT @leftfootfwd: Pickles' Plan to deal with "120,000 trouble families" in a tailspin http://t.co/zebzpu34

  20. UK Drug Training

    Pickles' Plan to deal with '120,000 trouble families' in a tailspin | Left Foot Forward http://t.co/MTNfqPf7

  21. BevR

    RT @leftfootfwd: Pickles' Plan to deal with "120,000 trouble families" in a tailspin http://t.co/zebzpu34

  22. Bob Ellard

    RT @leftfootfwd: Pickles' Plan to deal with "120,000 trouble families" in a tailspin http://t.co/zebzpu34

  23. Bob Ellard

    RT @leftfootfwd: Pickles' Plan to deal with "120,000 trouble families" in a tailspin http://t.co/mxMWakkq

  24. Labour saved 2m children from poverty | Left Foot Forward

    […] We found that levels of financial support for families with children were crucial. See also: • Pickles’ Plan to deal with “120,000 trouble families” in a tailspin 11 Jun […]

  25. Bob Ellard

    RT @leftfootfwd: Pickles' Plan to deal with "120,000 trouble families" in a tailspin http://t.co/mxMWakkq

  26. BevR

    RT @leftfootfwd: Pickles' Plan to deal with "120,000 trouble families" in a tailspin http://t.co/zebzpu34

  27. Stephen Connelly

    RT @leftfootfwd: Pickles' Plan to deal with "120,000 trouble families" in a tailspin http://t.co/OvvKRX5M

  28. Why do ministers refuse to invest in a housing boost that would be great for the economy? | Left Foot Forward

    […] be distracted by other issues like ministerial disputes over statistics, the economy or ‘troubled families’ a la […]

  29. Murray Christison

    The real sounce of 120,000 trouble families http://t.co/SnjT1rh7 #bbcqt

Leave a Reply