David Cameron’s latest attack on philanthropists has put another nail in the coffin of the Big Society, writes shadow Cabinet Office minister Gareth Thomas MP.
.
Gareth Thomas MP (Labour and Co-Operative, Harrow West) is a shadow Cabinet Office minister
David Cameron’s latest attack on philanthropists has put another nail in the coffin of the Big Society. Not content with undermining the voluntary sector, he has now taken to insulting people who give generous donations to charity. It shows staggering arrogance.
Cameron’s Big Society rhetoric has never matched the reality. His regular relaunches of what he called his mission in politics haven’t fooled those working in charities who have seen funding and support cut from under them.
But Cameron has now delivered another blow to charities and philanthropists. This week Number 10 insulted them, saying philanthropists are donating to charities which “don’t in all cases do a great amount of charitable work” in order to “wipe out” their tax bills.
This is a desperate attempt to justify the changes in this year’s budget which will limit the amount of tax relief which people can claim, including on donations to charity. Those who are abusing reliefs to cut their taxes should be stopped. But Osborne did not announce a cap on reliefs out of principle.
He did so in a last minute panic try and deflect criticism of his decision to cut the 50p tax rate, which will give a tax cut of more than £40,000 each year for 14,000 millionaires.
• It’s the Big Society that’s being hit by the government’s economics 9 Jan 2012
• Memo to Cameron: The rich give less to charity 4 Nov 2011
• How Cameron’s coalition is choking the Big Society 2 Nov 2011
• As Cameron talks up the Big Society, it’s crashing down 6 Jun 2011
• Five reasons why you can’t trust Cameron with the Big Society 14 Feb 2011
In their rush the Tories didn’t think through the impact on charities. In seeking to excuse a tax cut for all very high earners, Osborne chose to hit those who give to charity. Charities are already reporting an impact on donations. As Sir Nicholas Hytner, artistic director of the National Theatre, has said, the plans make “no sense”.
And in a clumsy attempt to cover up their mistake, the Tories are now accusing philanthropists and charities of tax avoidance.
David Cameron’s cuts were already squeezing the life out of the Big Society; his insults this week have put another nail in its coffin.
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
23 Responses to “Cameron’s attack on philanthropists is the latest nail in the Big Society coffin”
Labour Press Team
Cameron’s attack on philanthropists the latest nail in the Big Society coffin, writes Gareth Thomas MP: http://t.co/fFWHwgjm
Kevin Slocombe
Cameron’s attack on philanthropists the latest nail in the Big Society coffin, writes Gareth Thomas MP: http://t.co/fFWHwgjm
David Hadley
Cameron’s attack on philanthropists is the latest nail in the Big Society coffin, writes Gareth Thomas MP: http://t.co/fFWHwgjm
Simon Scriven
Cameron’s attack on philanthropists the latest nail in the Big Society coffin, writes Gareth Thomas MP: http://t.co/fFWHwgjm
Blarg1987
I see both sides of this case:
The trouble is in some cases an individual sets up a charity and pays most of their income into the said charity, they later on, sell up thier buisness or retire. They then become treasurer of said charity in which they pay themselves large sums of money and doing the odd bit of charitable work which equates less to the amount they would have to pay in tax.
This practice should stop, as charities should be an additional resource to state funding of services etc.
I believethat any organisation that spends more money on paying individuals ridiculus salaries then spending it on those it is meant to help, should loose its charitiable status as this could be percieved as fraud.
And I don;t mean this if it is a one of year it would have to be a systematic thing, I do admit their are lots of fantastic charities out there that do good work, shame those that try and provide infastructure in Africa get shafted by the banks after who possess it and charge their users.