Alex Hern further questions the letter to the Telegraph supporting the scrapping of the 50p tax rate.
While we’re picking apart the letter from 500 “wealth creators” to the Telegraph, Paul Lewis, presenter of Radio 4’s Money Box, points out that another of their claims also plays loose with the truth.
The letter begins:
Given the state of the British economy, we urge George Osborne, the Chancellor, to consider scrapping the top rate of tax in his forthcoming Budget. The tax, which is in effect a 58p tax after national insurance is taken into account, puts wealth creators like us in a very awkward position.
As Lewis points out, the 50p tax is very unlikely indeed to actually be ‘a 58p tax after national insurance’.
He explains how they came to that figure:
If an employee earns more than £150,000 then to get another £480 into their pocket you do indeed need to pay him or her £1000. That is subject to 50 per cent tax and two per cent NI leaving £480. But the employer also has to pay the employer’s National Insurance which is 13.8% or £138.
So out of a total cost to the employer of £1138 the employee gets just £480. Subtract one from the other and tax of £1138 – £480 = £658 has been paid. So the ‘rate’ of tax is £658 / £1138 = 57.8 per cent.
Except that total is unlikely to ever actually be paid:
These are large companies paying full-rate corporation tax on their profits. The whole cost of paying employees – their gross pay and the employer’s National Insurance charge – is deductible from profits.
So in fact the gross cost of paying someone £1000 is reduced by the corporation tax saved. Corporation tax is currently 26 per cent and falls to 25 per cent from 2012/13. The total extra pay bill of £1138 reduces corporation tax by £1138 x 25 per cent = £284.50. So the net cost to the employer is £1138 – £284.50 = £853.50.
The employee gets £480 in their pocket. And the amount that has disappeared in tax is £853.50 – £480 = £373.50. So the tax ‘rate’ is £373.50 / £853.50 = 43.8 per cent, which rounds up to 44 per cent of the total costs.
Lewis adds:
The only occasion when the net tax take from the grossed up pay would be almost 58 per cent is if the person earning over £150,000 is an employee who is not contracted out of state second pension, and the company makes no profit.
Hardly a titan of industry.
See also:
• Memo to 50p tax trashers: Laffer Curve peaks at over 75 per cent – Alex Hern, March 1st 2012
• It’s official: the 50p tax rate raises revenue – Alex Hern, January 9th 2012
• 50p tax: Still a Tory obsession, still not that exceptional – Alex Hern, November 24th 2011
• The 50p tax debate: Are we taxing off our nose to spite our face? – Luke Bozier, September 16th 2011
• Only quarter of voters want to scrap 50p tax – Will Straw, August 1st 2011
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
26 Responses to “Memo to 50p tax trashers, #2: The effective tax rate is hardly ever 58p”
Chris Moody
And they completely ignore the massive burden on new graduates, who if they can find themselves a job, pay income tax, NI and their massive loan repayments, all of which add up to something like 35-40% of their usually meagre salaries.. Why are the Right not talking about disincentives for them?
Alex Smith
… Aaaaaaand here's @AlexHern's second memo to the 50p tax trashers: the effective tax rate is hardly ever 58p: http://t.co/vtGsCkIq #BBCqt
D Brady
@Joey7Barton the effective tax rate is hardly ever 58p: http://t.co/iCgqJe7Z #BBCqt”
Tony27nine
Your confusing corporation tax and income tax. A corporation tax saving doesn’t affect the employee. I own a business. If I earned over £150k at the point that I paid the money out to myself i would indeed pay 57.8%. The fact that the company pays less tax is irrelevant.
I signed the letter and i don’t even qualify to pay tax at the 50% rate. i can however see that if we want to encourage people to the UK to create jobs we need to stop disincentivising them with the fourth highest top tax rate in the world.
I employ 450 people. In setting up the business 7 years ago I worked 80+ hours a week for years. I mortgaged my house and gave guarantees to the bank.I put in nearly all my savings. In the first 15 months I took out £26k in wages. Are you saying that it would be OK to penalise me now for reaping the benefits of that? Most of the people I know who have their own businesses have got similar stories. We aren’t all ‘fat cats’ out for everything we can get and I’m happy to pay my fair share. Ask any of the 450 people that work with me and not one begrudges what I earn.
I would describe myself a socialist entrepreneur. I think that their should be fairness in the tax system but that hard work and sacrifice should be rewarded.
You may be right when you say the”right just don’t get it” but when comments from the left come over as whingeing jealousy you’re not doing yourself any favours either.
Janet Graham
… Aaaaaaand here's @AlexHern's second memo to the 50p tax trashers: the effective tax rate is hardly ever 58p: http://t.co/vtGsCkIq #BBCqt