Carl Packman exposes the sick underbelly of anti-Semitisim at the heart of George Galloway’s victorious Bradford West by-election campaign.
.
Carl Packman blogs at the Though Cowards Flinch blog
George Galloway, the new MP for Bradford West, could hardly contain his satisfaction in the early hours after it was reported he had won his election campaign. “By the Grace of God”, he opined in a tweet, “we have won the most sensational victory in British political history.”
Before long it was being dubbed the Bradford Spring, the implication being that a despot was ousted while a rainbow coalition of groups has united in search of the goal of democracy.
But unity was the last thing Galloway had on his mind when he took to the road.
Reading around I found that the Muslim Public Affairs Committee, an organisation that wants to empower “Muslims to focus on non-violent Jihad and political activism”, who naturally support Galloway and Respect, had published a blog post on the Bradford West Labour candidate Imran Hussein, describing him as “thirsty”, dishing out ad hominem attacks, relaying childish jibes that Hussain “might have to rely on his trusted pals John E Walker and Jackie Daniels to give him a hand”.
One of course would naturally assume that this level of politics be beneath the anti-war firebrand. But of course this turned out to be false.
When I spoke to one Labour activist who travelled from London to Bradford to join the campaign against Galloway, he described Respect’s campaign as “vile” – not least because of the personal letter sent around by Galloway claiming:
“I, George Galloway, do not drink alcohol and never have. Ask yourself if you believe the other candidate in this election can say that truthfully.”
Addressing the “voters of the Muslim faith and Pakistani heritage in Bradford West”, Galloway felt it apt to write:
“God KNOWS who is a Muslim. And he KNOWS who is not. Instinctively, so do you.”
His references to his Labour opponent as a “Muslim” in inverted commas made it obvious he wanted the “Muslim faith and Pakistani heritage” vote because he was the real Muslim candidate, which Labour rightly responded to as a “bizarre and deeply insulting letter”.
While on the trail Galloway also dragged out of the woodwork supporters of note, namely Carole Swords and Yvonne Ridley. Swords, chair of the Tower Hamlets Respect Party, was convicted in February for slapping a Jewish man during a boycott protest at a supermarket.
Making the line between anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism even thinner she was previously found to have written on Facebook that Zionists are “cockroaches” who “hide in the dark and try to create havoc where they lay their eggs” and that those “slimy, vile, hard skin bugs need to be stomped out”.
Yvonne Ridley, on the other hand, who is reported once to have said she’s “quite a fan of Mahmoud Admadinejad who is adored by the common man and woman in Iran”, and that “Zionists have tentacles everywhere”, told supporters of Galloway’s campaign recently that sentences handed to young men after the Bradford riots represented an “apartheid-style justice that we haven’t seen since the days of South Africa”.
With the “most sensational victory in British political history” and comparisons to South Africa, Bradford ought to feel like the centre of the universe.
• How much longer will Labour MPs cosy up to extremists? 30 Jun 2011
• The A-Z of Ayman al-Zawahiri 16 Jun 2011
• Too many on the Left are continuing to promote Islamist extremists 20 May 2011
• Hell Called, Your Place is Reserved: Muslim-country blogs react to Bin Laden death 3 May 2011
• We shouldn’t abandon the label “extremist” for extremists 20 Jan 2011
• Lifting the lid on Islamist radicalisation at British universities 19 October 2010
• Islamic extremist calls British troops Nazis 4 Jan 2010
But in the age of austerity it drew a cheap politician.
The way in which Galloway conducted his deeply divisive campaign should leave him with nothing to be proud about. But as I said yesterday he doesn’t care about you, or me or Bradford, or Glasgow or Bethnal Green, or Joe Public, or the man-in-the-street. Galloway is a one-man brand, and one who appeals to low politics and dirty tricks – what a pity that we have to see him in parliament (occasionally) again.
99 Responses to “The sick anti-Semites at the heart of Galloway’s band of bigots”
ABradfordian
You are rolling around in jam, cackling at the moon, bat-shit mental!
I love it!
“Sock it up”?!?! Hahahaha!
If you are really trying to argue that the respect party is to the right of Labour ,or to the right of any other political party in parliament even, then you have left reality, and gone to cuckoo land. There’s no real point in me taking my time to deconstruct your argument.
>>>>>
It’s nice to see your edit in support of George’s long standing anti-racism stance. I see that my posts have been worthwhile in converting you to George’s anti-war anti-racism anti-violence message. Have a nice evening.
Anonymous
No, I’m in favour of ACTUAL anti-racism, not your and George’s support for terror and terrorism against Jewish people.
Of course you can’t deal with someone actually on the left saying this. You have to borrow the social darwinist tactic of accusing people of insanity.
I’m a left-winger. Labour are centralist. You’re once again using right-wing tactics on THAT. And when it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck and acts like a duck, it ain’t an alien from epsilon pegasi, it’s a duck.
Of course you gotta run away from any analysis. You might have to face up to Galloway’s actual views, which are most certainly not generally anti-violence, but selectively so.
ABradfordian
Well, it appears that you’re the biggest supporter of this article that so many others have trashed. I’ll personally be writing to LeftFootForward and using you as an example of the type of nutter that this sort of journalism attracts. Calling George Galloway an anti-semite (which is both a lie and ameliorates its impact when used so loosely, shame on you) on the day he wins a historic by-election is what I would expect from the Murdoch press, and not a blog that is supported by my union, Unison, who I will also be writing too if this Carl Packman’s excuse for an article is not removed.
Good luck George Galloway!
Anonymous
You are explicitly denied permission to quote anything I write on any other website. I’ve had people try this crap before, and I won’t stand for being used as a weapon against my people.
Your politics of division, and your attempt at censorship – which I take as social darwinist and an expression of eugenics in itself, after your attempt at calling me mentally ill here – speaks for itself.
I, frankly, hope Unite expel you.
VERY few Jews are going to disagree with this article, you’ll find.
ABradfordian
Mate you really need some help.
“I, frankly, hope Unite expel you.” I’m in Unison.