Ben Fox analyses what the latest round of quantitative easing means for the real economy
So QE3 here we come. The Bank of England is going to pump another £50 billion into the economy, taking the total amount of extra liquidity since 2009 to £325 billion.
It’s not a surprise, and neither should anybody be shocked that interest rates will remain at 0.5 per cent. Everybody was expecting the Bank to engage in another round of money printing. But will it make any difference?
The measures taken by the Bank of England and the European Central Bank over the past year to ease credit conditions have had little positive effect. The ECB’s programme of reducing the cost of its loans to banks has led to banks borrowing £500 billion from the ECB since the start of the year.
But while the central banks have undoubtedly helped banks improve their balance sheets, these emergency measures are precisely that – emergency. They have done little to help the ailing economic situation. Instead, without lending requirements, the banks have continued their post-credit crunch over-reaction in refusing to lend.
The Bank has rightly argued that the scheme of printing new money and buying government assets with it has helped keep a lid on borrowing costs and inflation. But there is little evidence that banks have passed on the effects to businesses.
In fact, QE has actively hit pensioners’ incomes by depressing annuity rates by up to 25 per cent. What we have, is a situation where extra money worth around 20 per cent of our annual GDP has been printed, yet lending is stagnant as is the UK economy. The stand-off between government, the banks and customers continues.
Stimulating lending is one of the most important tasks in staving off a prolonged double-dip recession. Many businesses are already feeling the pinch, with the likes of clothing-chain Peacocks just the latest high-street shop to close down. Without sustained bank lending, more will have to close their doors.
In fact, Ernst and Young’s Item Club has actually forecast total bank loans to reduce by 2.2 per cent in 2012, with just a marginal improvement of 0.9 per cent in 2013, having increased by an estimated 4.3 per cent in 2011.
The Item Club’s Neil Blake said that 2012 will see:
“The first time there will be an annual contraction in total loans since 2009, when the UK economy was still suffering from the immediate effects of the global financial crisis.”
Rather than rely that enough money will be printed to keep the economic wheels turning, the government or Bank of England should insist that lending targets to small businesses are kept to. There is no excuse for failure, particularly from RBS and Lloyd’s where the taxpayer is the largest shareholder. If necessary, failure to hit the ‘Project Merlin’ targets should result in fines.
Indeed, the reaction of TUC general secretary Brendan Barber to today’s announcement is bang on the money, arguing that the new liquidity must get through to companies if it is to have a positive impact.
Barber commented that:
“More needs to be done to ensure that this latest injection of cash actually reaches the businesses that need it, rather than just gathering dust on banks’ balance sheets. The failure of banks to increase net lending to businesses, despite £275bn of quantitative easing, is holding back growth in the real economy.”
The government and the Bank of England must make sure that the extra liquidity announced today benefits the real economy. There is no value in allowing it to slosh around on the banks’ balance sheets.
See also:
• ConHome: Neuter the Health Bill – Daniel Elton, February 10th, 2012
• The Financial Times comes out against the NHS bill – Alex Hern, February 9th 2012
• Don’t believe the spin – the health reforms are Cameron’s just as much as Lansley’s – Shamik Das, February 8th 2012
• Miliband goes on attack as fight to save the NHS stepped up – Shamik Das, February 6th 2012
• Sign my petition to drop Lansley’s monster – Dr Kailash Chand OBE, November 24th 2011
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
16 Responses to “What does QE3 mean for the real economy?”
Dave
Erm Peacocks is not closing down (as of yet) might want to do some research before you post up this.
Pulp Ark
What does QE3 mean for the real economy? http://t.co/8O9B1jly #Public_Services_for_All #Bank_of_England #muslim #tcot #sioa
Jeni Parsons
RT @leftfootfwd: What does QE3 mean for the real economy? http://t.co/kQlZqPyM #occupylondon #spartacusreport Means nothing – econ stagnant
Patron Press - #P2
#UK : What does QE3 mean for the real economy? http://t.co/mXPDawic
Micaela Gallerini
#UK : What does QE3 mean for the real economy? http://t.co/mXPDawic