“The PM is wrong: the labour market is very weak”

Richard Exell runs through the latest figures from the labour market, and finds that "it is very weak and the prospects for unemployed people are very poor."

 

On the face of it, today’s employment figures were mixed.

The unemployment figures were as bloody as expected, reaching 2,685,000 in the three months from September to November. This is an increase of 118,000 from June – August and the highest level since July 1994. This is the sixth month running to have seen an increase – if unemployment continues to rise at this rate it will reach three million by July.

• The number of unemployed women rose again, reaching 1,128,000, the highest figure since October 1987. The 59,000 increase is the largest since April 2009.

• The claimant count measure of unemployment rose 1,200, to 1,597,000. The rise was rather less than expected, but the five per cent claimant count rate remains the highest since August 1997.

The number of people under 25 who are unemployed rose again, to 1,043,000.

Total employment rose, however, and David Cameron was keen to highlight this at prime minister’s questions:

“I think it’s noteworthy that, while the increase in unemployment is hugely unwelcome, there is still an increase in the number employed – another 18,000 in work.”

But the government should not take a great deal of comfort from this figure. The number of employees actually fell, but the overall employment figure rose because of a massive increase in self-employment:

Change in numbers in different categories of employment: Jun-Aug to Sep-Nov
Category of employment Change in level
Employees – 109,000
Self-employed + 101,000
Unpaid family workers + 14,000
Govt supported schemes + 12,000

This is the fourth month running when the number of employees has fallen and the number self-employed has risen.

A very interesting report today from John Philpott at the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development looked at the Rise In Self-employment since the start of the recession.

CIPD provides very good reasons for believing that we haven’t had an increase in entrepreneurship, but a growing number of “odd jobbers”, willing to try their hand at anything to avoid being unemployed. This may be better than an increase in unemployment, if that’s the alternative, but it’s a sign of a weak labour market, not a strong one.

Another troubling feature of the employment figures is that the increase is the net result of a 75,000 increase in the numbers working part-time and a 57,000 fall in the numbers working full-time.

Altogether, the number of employees working full-time fell by 140,000. Inevitably, involuntary atypical employment continued to increase, with a 10,000 rise in the number of temporary employees who could not find permanent jobs and a 44,000 rise in the number of part-time workers who could not find full-time work:

The increase in the numbers on government schemes is positive – I’ve complained here before about the low level of participation when unemployment is high and rising – but the 14 per cent increase in unpaid family workers certainly isn’t. Unpaid work is troubling and an increase can be a sign of a weak labour market.

A final point worth noting is that the increase was entirely due to a 64,000 increase in the number of people over state pension age who are in employment – there’s nothing wrong with this, but we should worry that the number of working age people in employment fell by 46,000.

And there are other signs of a weak labour market in today’s figures. On the quarter, the number of redundancies increased by nearly ten per cent, continuing what now looks like a trend, not a blip:

There are now 5.8 unemployed people for each job vacancy, up from 5.6 in the last quarter. Again, this looks like a trend, not a blip:

On top of these figures, we have

• The Federation of Small Businesses reporting yesterday that a net balance of 6.5 per cent of SMEs plan to cut the numbers they employ in the first quarter of 2012,

• The British Chambers of Commerce opining that businesses “do not seem optimistic about future recruitment”,

• The ITEM Club revising down their GDP and employment forecasts, and

• The Centre for Economics and Business Research concluding that the UK is already in recession and that unemployment will rise to three million within 18 months.

The Prime Minister is wrong: the labour market is very weak and the prospects for unemployed people are very poor.

See also:

Unemployment: How Cameron and Clegg are letting the next generation downStephen Timms MP and Rachel Reeves MP, December 14th 2011

Unemployment: Plan A isn’t workingRichard Exell, December 14th 2011

Unemployment hits 17-year high – record number of young people out of workShamik Das, October 12th 2011

Without a Plan B, the record unemployment figures look set to get worseRichard Exell, September 14th 2011

Youth unemployment is still a cause for concernRichard Exell, July 22nd 2011

25 Responses to ““The PM is wrong: the labour market is very weak””

  1. Giles Bradshaw

    It looks from that graph like the last Government took an unemployment rate trending downward and turned it around. Just like they took a relatively stable economy and turned it into a nightmare.

  2. BevR

    RT @leftfootfwd: "The PM is wrong: the labour market is very weak" //t.co/BYNIun3m

  3. Tara Ray

    “The PM is wrong: the labour market is very weak”: The number of employees actually fell, but the overall employ… //t.co/ywleazsm

  4. Nicol Rogoff

    “The PM is wrong: the labour market is very weak”: The number of employees actually fell, but the overall employ… //t.co/we0NnZwu

  5. Rachel Hopfensperger

    “The PM is wrong: the labour market is very weak”: The number of employees actually fell, but the overall employ… //t.co/v5BJ9CvS

  6. Jasmin Lisbeth

    “The PM is wrong: the labour market is very weak”: The number of employees actually fell, but the overall employ… //t.co/3NdDYsmN

  7. Erin Margolis

    “The PM is wrong: the labour market is very weak”: The number of employees actually fell, but the overall employ… //t.co/QInFClwu

  8. Kanesha Lafevre

    “The PM is wrong: the labour market is very weak”: The number of employees actually fell, but the overall employ… //t.co/61e2UYmJ

  9. Luan Hernandez

    “The PM is wrong: the labour market is very weak”: The number of employees actually fell, but the overall employ… //t.co/YFgRJCxK

  10. Leia Loker

    “The PM is wrong: the labour market is very weak”: The number of employees actually fell, but the overall employ… //t.co/lPdeae4d

  11. awake!

    It will probably worsen
    still, it ain’t Spain with 50% youth unemployment. I mean , that’s just not possible here, or is it?

  12. Mr. Sensible

    Another example of the Coalition’s approach working so well…

  13. Knut Cayce

    RT @leftfootfwd: "The PM is wrong: the #labour #market is very #weak" //t.co/wHcjNL92

  14. Brnch Sec Ruth H

    RT @leftfootfwd: "The PM is wrong: the labour market is very weak" //t.co/5AzPAtWM

  15. Unemployment could hit 3m by summer | Liberal Conspiracy

    […] could hit 3m by summer by Richard Exell     January 19, 2012 at 8:20 am I had a post at Left Foot Forward, looking at yesterday’s labour market […]

  16. AltGovUK

    RT @leftfootfwd: "The PM is wrong: the labour market is very weak": //t.co/SR8HI5JV @RichardExell examines the unemployment figures

  17. Knut Cayce

    RT @leftfootfwd: "The PM is wrong: the labour market is very weak": //t.co/SR8HI5JV @RichardExell examines the unemployment figures

  18. Alex Braithwaite

    RT @leftfootfwd: "The PM is wrong: the labour market is very weak" //t.co/eAnxZC7I

  19. Liza Harding

    RT @leftfootfwd: "The PM is wrong: the labour market is very weak": //t.co/SR8HI5JV @RichardExell examines the unemployment figures

  20. H. O.

    RT @leftfootfwd: "The PM is wrong: the labour market is very weak" //t.co/vTp9dil6

  21. TruthBeckons

    BRITAIN: "The PM is wrong: the labour market is very weak" //t.co/KPnVychc

  22. Knut Cayce

    BRITAIN: "The PM is wrong: the labour market is very weak" //t.co/KPnVychc

  23. JC

    It would make your argument more coherent if all the graphs represented the same period. As it is, you are obviously cherry-picking the data to suit whatever you want to say. Also, as Giles Bradshaw pointed out, the last (labour) government caused youth unemployment to increase after many years of reduction. Not cherry-picking enough?

  24. Newsbot9

    The minister for unemployment will get us there, by hook or by crook!

Leave a Reply