Today’s unemployment figures make for depressing reading, especially for young people, writes Sally Hunt.
Today’s unemployment figures (pdf) make for depressing reading, especially for young people, writes Sally Hunt, general secretary of the University and College Union (UCU)
As Graph 1 shows, youth unemployment has risen for the ninth successive month to 1.027 million, the highest since records began in 1992, beating the previous record set only last month.
Graph 1:
With the job market getting tougher by the day for young people, access to education and careers advice has never been more important. However, since coming to power the government has trebled the price of going to university, axed vital financial support (such as the education maintenance allowance – EMA) and got rid of the future jobs fund.
The logic behind these decisions is spurious at best, especially when you consider that hiking of the price of fees to £9,000 will force the treasury in the short-term to fund the cost of increased student loans. Similarly, where is the sense in getting rid of the EMA when it paid for itself and ensured thousands of poorer students were able to go to college instead of claiming benefits?
As well being a huge waste of talent the long-term implications of having one million young people out of work and study could be devastating for our economy. The cost of 16-18 year-olds not in education, employment or training runs in to billions every year.
Today’s figures are a worrying reminder we need to do more to help young people get on – not price them out of education and consign them to the dole queue.
Public spending on education in the UK is falling at the fastest rate since the 1950s and the Institute for Fiscal Studies has warned (pdf) that the government’s austerity programme will cut the living standards of Britain’s families by more than 10% over the next three years. Most worryingly, it concluded that it will be those on the lowest incomes who will suffer the most.
As long as the government continues to erect punitive financial barriers the problem of youth unemployment will only get worse.
The alternative to improving access to education and a good career is a generation with few prospects and little chance to alter their situation.
See also:
• Record NEET figures the result of Osborne’s ignorant, short-sighted ideology – Sally Hunt, November 24th 2011
• Stories from the economy, or: The prospects for young people, and other grim tales – Richard Exell, November 17th 2011
• Million young unemployed figure highlights enormity of the situation hitting our youth – Rory Weal, November 16th 2011
• Clegg under fire over voter registration, party funding and youth unemployment – Shamik Das, November 15th 2011
• Osborne’s refusal to increase demand leaves young unemployed without hope – Tony Dolphin, November 14th 2011
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
21 Responses to “Cameron is pricing the young out of education and consigning them to the dole queue”
Sarah Webster
Cameron is pricing the young out of education and consigning them to the dole queue: http://t.co/Hkng9bj5 writes @UCU's Sally Hunt
Anonymous
The big problem is this. There isn’t an issue with students funding their education at university. There is no reason why a plumber should fund it for them.
However it relates to the reward side. You want to penally tax them if that education pays off.
So we have another example of heads the government wins, tails the student loses.
Drop taxes for graduates, and then it becomes more economical for many of them to take the risk.
However, you can’t, because the government is desperate for cash because of all its debts.
Yet another example of how it takes a government to really mess things up.
The next thing to look at it why the education costs so much. What’s the comparison?
27 grand in debt for a student for fees.
400 * 12 = 4,800 pounds if you go the Open University route and earn at the same time.
So what do you get for the 22K that is the difference?
1. I suspect you’re funding research departments.
2. You’re paying for universities debts.
3. It’s an awful lot of pastoral care to stop Little Johny harming himself whilst pissed.
…
Government needs to stop trying to have all the bites at the cherry and it needs to look at the price difference to see where the money is going.
If you have kids, fund their OU education whilst they earn, and the gap year to have some fun. Far cheaper, and better too for them long term. Who do you employ? The OU student with lots of practical experience, and a degree that they had to work for the hard way, or Tristian with no experience and a degree in propping up the student bar?
chris star
Cameron is pricing the young out of education and consigning them to the dole queue..
http://t.co/joSUH2Jb
Michael
Cameron is pricing the young out of education and consigning them to the dole queue l Left Foot Forward – http://t.co/epzKLr9o
David Smout
Cameron is pricing the young out of education and consigning them to the dole queue | Left Foot Forward http://t.co/527sDu8R