Lucy James of the Campaign for High Speed Rail says the delaying of the decision till the New Year is nothing to worry about - HS2 will still go ahead.
By Lucy James of the Campaign for High Speed Rail
Last Saturday, the government announced its decision to re-examine sections of the High Speed Two (HS2) route between London and Birmingham. As a result, the official decision on whether to go ahead with HS2 will no longer be made in December, but in the New Year.
The section of the route in question is around Amersham, where the government are considering spending £500 million on a 1½ mile tunnel to connect two previously planned tunnels that run underneath a section of the Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) in the Chilterns.
The delay has been incurred in order to allow a feasibility study to take place into the tunnel in question and to reexamine the overall environmental impact of the proposed route more broadly.
The government claim it won’t increase the cost of the project overall as they will find the money by making savings on other sections of the route. It is impossible to comment on this at this stage with the information available from the government. However, on the basis of the information available, this announcement is a fundamentally good thing for two reasons.
Firstly, it is important to make HS2 as environmentally friendly as possible. Despite outrageous accusations to the contrary, supporters of HS2 are not out to tear up the countryside.
Last week a report by Greengauge 21, commissioned by groups including the Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE) and the RSPB, found:
“If the detailed planning is done properly, HS2 should make a positive contribution to reducing greenhouse gas emissions.”
This tunnel has the potential to offset some of the environmental impacts of HS2 in an AONB. If you can achieve this without spending more money overall that has got to be a good thing.
Secondly, tinkering with the route shows the government’s commitment to the project. It has always been important to be open to route improvements. After all, this was surely the point of carrying out the public consultation. It is only right the government takes into consideration suggestions for route improvement as they are doing and that the project goes ahead using the best route possible.
It is more important to do it right than to do it fast.
The key rationale for supporting high speed rail is the impending capacity crisis hurtling towards the UK’s railways. Sections of the East Coast Main Line are already blocked and Network Rail predicts the West Coast Main Line will be at full capacity by 2024. Lack of drastic action could ultimately lead to the serious decline of Britain’s railways infrastructure.
Some of the groups that oppose HS2 claim sufficient capacity can be created by implementing a set of incremental upgrades on the West Coast Main Line. However, the last time the WCML was upgraded it went over budget by £6 billion and took longer than a decade.
This illustrates both the financial difficulties of upgrading a live line, and the chaos it causes to commuters.
This is a typical short-term make-do-and-mend approach that will not be sufficient in the long-run; in the words of Network Rail (pdf):
“[After 2024 the WCML] is effectively full and any interventions (track upgrades) will be disproportionately expensive compared with the benefits gained.”
HS2 is important on the basis of other issues core issues for the left.
Firstly, HS2 will go some way in helping to rebalance the national economy. In rather simple terms this is because increased connectivity leads to better economic productivity, known as the agglomeration effect. HS2 is a positive step to making sure no regions are left behind as they were in the 1980s.
In the same way, HS2 is a long-term infrastructure investment that could help lead to regional job creation. In a report (pdf) from Core Cities released in June, leading economists estimated the creation of one million jobs outside of the South East rests on the rail capacity that HS2 will provide.
Were the project to be cancelled, the UK would miss its chance to deal with a capacity crisis that would be irreversibly damaging for Britain’s railways. It would lead to increasingly disgruntled passengers and an inevitable political headache for the next Labour government. It would stand in the way of boosting economic productivity and job creation in the regions.
Instead we are witnessing a minor delay to allow the consideration of a minor alteration to a project that millions will reap the benefits of for generations.
HS2 has the potential to be the greatest rail project since the Victorian era, and one which can set the tone of travel and infrastructure for the next century. Its success will not be affected by a one month delay or a new tunnel to save an AONB.
We are still confident HS2 will be given the green light in the New Year.
See also:
• The railways: Yet another broken market in the UK – Ben Mitchell, August 19th 2011
• Audit Commission to investigate anti-HS2 Tory councils – Shamik Das, September 9th 2011
• High Speed Rail: Deconstructing the right wing dogma – Professor David Begg, July 19th 2011
• How to do high speed rail well – Richard Hebditch, April 7th 2011
• There are concerns with High Speed Rail but it’s still worth doing – Richard George, March 10th 2011
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
24 Responses to “Wheels still on despite HS2 delay”
Mike Geddes
Among the errors in Lucy James’ piece are the following:
1. Greengauge 21, whose report on the environmental impact of HS2 purports to refresh its tarnished environmental credentials, are so closely tied to the pro-HS2 lobby that their work cannot be taken seriously.
2. The Core Cities report does NOT show that 1 million jobs rest on HS2. The Core Cities report cites a consultancy report for them by Volterra, who develop a number of hypothetical economic scenarios for the core cities. The highly unlikey ‘best case’ scenario talks about 1m jobs. But this is for the period up to 2020 – well before HS2 would even be running!!
Have you actually read the report, Lucy?
Jerry Marshall
The problem with HS2 is that the net cost to the taxpayer is £1700 per family and it will cost 4 jobs for every one created. Spending so much on a single line – which is only 56% loaded at peak times and 2 more carriages due next year – is simply the wrong priority. Two more carriages could be added and four line bottlenecks dealt with to triple capacity if needed. There are better more affordable ways to improve the railways and reduce journey times for more people more quickly. Why cut bus services and jeopardise the Northern Hub to subsidise what Philip Hammond called a ‘Rich Man’s Toy’?
HS2 is the FUTURE
https://www.leftfootforward.org/2011/12/high-speed-rail-hs2-announcement-delay/
Newsbot9
There are no wheels and never were. HS2 is instead of important projects like fully electrifying the other main lines in this country!
Rich
Nobody is getting a cheque for £1700 through their letterbox if HS2 doesn’t go ahead Jerry, so stop lying. Shoving extra carriages on is a pathetic short-term fix, and it’s patently obvious to anyone who’s used them that inter-city trains out of Euston during peak time are *not* 56% loaded. Your alternatives have been demolished by seasoned experts and your experience in railway planning matters is nil. The only way to get the required future capacity out of New St to International will mean hundreds of houses being demolished, far more than HS2, but that won’t matter because none of them are yours. You have nothing to offer other than selfish nimbyism.