It now looks increasingly likely the EU26 will be able to use the full spectrum of European Union institutions, undemining David Cameron’s summit ‘success’.
It now looks increasingly likely the EU26 will be able to use the full spectrum of European Union institutions – totally undermining one of David Cameron’s self-spun ‘wins’ for Britain from last week’s summit.
The Economist’s Bagehot reports:
Mr Cameron was in sober form.
He seemed to many of us hacks in the press gallery to signal that Britain might yet give ground and allow the new euro-plus pact of 23 (and soon 24 or 25) countries to use at least some of the institutions of the full EU, in contrast with the early insistence of his chancellor of the exchequer, George Osborne, that the main point of Mr Cameron’s stand on Thursday night had been to veto the use of the “full panoply” of institutions by the new club.
With today’s Times (£) adding:
Downing Street signalled that Mr Cameron was ready to yield on one of Mr Clegg’s objections – the Prime Minister’s assertion that the new “euro-plus” group of up to 26 nations should not use the institutions of the European Union.
One of the stated reasons for Mr Cameron’s veto was to ensure that the new group could not pursue its interests with the force of Brussels law, an outcome described by Mr Clegg as “ludicrous”.
Downing Street is paving the way for Britain to accede to the group using EU institutions.
The government had received legal advice and Mr Clegg’s objections had to be taken into account. There was “a sense of inevitability” that the group would gain access to the EU’s institutions, said one aide.
All a far cry from just a few days ago, when George Osborne insisted:
“The integration of the eurozone, which we think is necessary to make the single currency work, is not taking place within the full panoply of the European treaties, with the full deployment of the European institutions enforcing those treaties.
“And because we were unable to get British safeguards that might have allowed that to happen, we’re not allowing it to happen.”
So, when all’s said and done, what exactly did Mr Cameron gain from his brattish petulance?
See also:
• Cameron turns Britain from an outlier into an irrelevance – James Denselow, December 12th 2011
• Cameron sells out UK manufacturing for his loony backbenchers – Tony Burke, December 12th 2011
• How Cameron traded influence for isolation – Ben Fox, December 12th 2011
• Look Left – Europe 26-1 Cameron: Britain isolated like never before – Shamik Das, December 9th 2011
• The view from abroad: The day Britain locked itself out – Alex Hern, December 9th 2011
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
15 Responses to “What exactly did Cameron get from the EU summit?”
ElaineSco
RT @TheRightArticle What exactly did #Cameron get from the EU summit?l Shamik Das http://t.co/3PUL8fKj public stop pattin dickhead on back
Rick
And Cameron didn't really get anything at all: http://t.co/Y72UZI7U Even the one per cent ought to be disappointed by his performance.
Look Left – Labour hold Feltham but deeper problems remain | Left Foot Forward
[…] asked about what exactly Cameron gained for Britain from wielding his veto, with it now looking increasingly likely the EU-26 will be able to use the “full panoply” of Brussels institutions, undermining one of […]
Alexander: All Cameron’s “phantom veto” did was undermine British influence | Left Foot Forward
[…] What exactly did Cameron get from the EU summit? – Shamik Das, December 13th […]
Miliband: With this PM, a veto's not for life, it's just for Christmas | Left Foot Forward
[…] over a month after David Cameron’s not-quite-a-veto on the EU, and the government is having to backtrack even on the weak claims they made at the […]