Investors do not trust a banking sector grown drunk on bonuses - one of the reasons why we are facing a new credit crunch, writes Cormac Hollingsworth.
Last week saw a co-ordinated intervention by the world’s major central banks to lend to commercial banks globally.
We are back in a new “credit crunch” according to Bank of England Governor Mervyn King. We warned in October this was coming our way: the ability of banks to lend is related to their ability to borrow, and already in September banks were struggling.
Banking is global, and the UK is suffering from the poor capitalization of European banks – that is, once you take into account everything European banks owe to others, they do not have enough capital to cover potential losses.
The eurozone governments did not restructure their banks as we did in 2008, by putting £50bn into Lloyds, RBS and HBOS, firing the management of RBS, and forcing Barclays to raise equity.
They gambled that the UK and US had done enough, and they did not need to do likewise – even though the IMF estimated in 2010 that the Eurozone needed to put in $380 billion into their banks versus zero for the UK.
They gambled and lost. And it’s the bad apples of Eurozone banks that have spoilt the market for everyone. However, this isn’t the whole story.
In the twelve months before the October 2008 crash, there were many private investors, such as pension funds and insurance companies, who were happy to put new equity into banks so that they could cover their losses and continue to make new loans – in effect, a private recapitalisation.
In 2008 shareholders were prepared to give the management of banks a second chance. Between the stabilisation of the money markets – the place where banks lend to and borrow from one another – in 2010 and those markets freezing in August 2011, there’s also been plenty of time.
So why weren’t there similar private recapitalisations in the first half of 2011? The answer is that private shareholders are not prepared to give the current bankers another chance. And a lot of that is down to bankers’ pay.
By January 2011 the Financial Times was reporting (£):
The world’s largest investment banks are setting aside a bigger slice of their revenues to pay staff, in spite of lower profits and the ongoing backlash against bankers’ bonuses.
In 2010 new hires in investment banks were promising a whopping 8.5% of the bonus pool on average according to the survey of the bankers’ lobby firm, the Institute of International Finance (IIF). That was higher than both the highest year for bonuses of 7.1% in 2007, and way above the year previously, the worst year for bonuses, 2009, a proportion of 5.5% of the bonus pool.
It is very difficult to measure what guaranteed bonuses have been promised to existing employees, particularly they are now banned by the Basel-based Financial Stability Board (FSB). However, this IIF survey is indicative of the direction of pay across the industry.
So in February this year, while Bob Diamond was telling the Treasury select committee that “the time for banker remorse was over”, shareholders were concluding something different. The lesson investors learnt since the public bailouts in 2008 was that behavior in banking wasn’t going to change. The banks were going to continue to divert much of their revenues towards bonuses
At a visceral level, investors concluded that much of the new capital went straight to bankers’ bonuses. This has made them unwilling to provide new capital.
As the FT’s Lex Column said (£) at the end of October, “London banker bonus: beware investors”:
Bankers need to moderate their expectations [on bonuses]. If profits fall, so must pay… Reform in a global sector is hard to achieve. But there is a force to be reckoned with: under-remunerated investors, who provide the bankers’ capital, can always sell their shares. So bankers should beware the years to come.”
By October this warning was too late, bank shareholders had started to sell their bank shares in droves and as a result, bank share prices have halved during the past three months. RBS share prices spent a week below 20p last week.
This is an important level, the last time they were below 20p was the week of they hit their low in January 2009. Indeed, according to RBS CEO Stephen Hester, bank shares are now viewed as a “dumb investment”.
An argument between City shareholders and City bankers about who gets a dividend versus who gets a bonus is not normally an area for public concern, except when it is in banking. It runs through the lack of capital to the lack of confidence in the wholesale money markets where banks need to borrow.
And now, because nothing has been done over the last two months despite share price levels not seen since Jan 2009, it’s about to be felt across the economy.
There are many causes of this coming crisis: the unwillingness of eurozone governments to force their banks to recapitalize; the zero growth for the past year has reduced UK company credit-worthiness; the government has failed to raise requirements for bank capital ratios to be high enough.
But these all could have had a private sector solution over the past 18 months. That they didn’t is because of the unchanged behavior of the banks.
When Stephen Hester appeared before the Treasury select committee a fortnight ago, he said “cutting banker pay would not increase lending” to the economy. He’s wrong, because banker’s pay is at the core of this renewed banking crisis.
• Coalition fails “moment of truth” on bankers’ bonuses – Will Straw, February 9th 2011
• Countering the myths that bankers will leave if bonuses are reduced – Duncan Exley, February 9th 2011
• Top Lib Dem: Bankers’ bonuses are “moment of truth for coalition” – Will Straw, January 10th 2011
• Johnson: Clegg’s talk on bankers’ bonuses all “hot air” – Chris Tarquini, December 17th 2010
• Labour MEPs win vote on capping bankers’ bonuses – Will Straw, June 23rd 2010
As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.
We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.