“We’re all in this together” – when ‘we’ means the bottom 80%

Will Straw examines the regressive nature of the chancellor's autumn statement

The small print of the chancellor’s autumn statement shows that the totality of tax, tax credit and benefit measures adopted by the coalition government or carried over from the previous Labour government will be regressive for the lowest 80 per cent of earners.

The latest analysis will further damage George Osborne’s claim that those with the “broadest shoulders should bear the greatest burden”.

Chart 1B of the supplementary document titled ‘Impact on households: Distributional analysis to accompany the Autumn Statement 2011’ (pdf) shows that those in the lowest income decile are the second worst hit by the totality of government measures, after the richest 10 per cent who face a 50p income tax charge on earnings above £150,000.

The line slopes upwards across the poorest eight deciles, showing that low earners are harder hit than wealthier families.

Measures announced today that will exacerbate this trend include the announcement that the government will not go ahead with the planned £110 above inflation increase to the child element of the child tax credit, and will not uprate the couple and lone parent elements of the Working Tax Credit in 2012–13.

These measures save £1.2 billion, much of which is passed on to motorists, who will benefit from a defer the 3.02 pence per litre fuel duty increase that was due to take effect on 1 January 2012 to 1 August 2012, and cancel a further increase planned for August 2012 at a cost of £975 million in 2012-13.

After enduring two years of pay freezes, public sector workers including teachers and nurses will have to endure pay rises of a paltry one per cent for two years, saving the Treasury £1 billion by 2014-15.

George Osborne did not claim today that “we’re all in it together”. The reason is glaringly obvious.

See also:

Kellner: The public don’t like the Tories, but they’ve signed up to their economic argumentDaniel Elton, November 28th 2011

On the Financial Transaction Tax, why is Osborne on the side of the one per cent?Shamik Das, November 2nd 2011

There’s nothing exceptional about 50% tax ratesDeclan Gaffney, September 9th 2011

Cruddas: Big Society failing the “all in this together” test as safety nets goDaisy Blacklock, April 26th 2011

Lib Dem, Tory and Labour all in this together on financial regulationWill Straw, January 24th 2011

Like this article? Sign up to Left Foot Forward's weekday email for the latest progressive news and comment - and support campaigning journalism by making a donation today. 

33 Responses to ““We’re all in this together” – when ‘we’ means the bottom 80%”

  1. Anonymous

    Yep, but the rich and middle class are still funding it.

    Mind you, when you were funding people with 170K of tax free welfare a year (no incapacity benefit), what the heck. By your measure they are still poor and bear the brunt of the cuts.

  2. Who is paying for the chancellor’s announcements? | Left Foot Forward

    […] also: • “We’re all in this together” – when ‘we’ means the bottom 80% – Will Straw, November 29th […]

  3. How Osborne's locked in to making the bad times worse | Left Foot Forward

    […] also: • “We’re all in this together” – when ‘we’ means the bottom 80% – Will Straw, November 29th […]

  4. Tarka the Rotter

    Left Foot Fotward…is that like back to the future? Just asking…

  5. Dev Raval

    Treasury distributional analysis shows bottom takes bigger hit than upper middle: http://t.co/cmpKgRkr

  6. ChaucerClaire

    Treasury distributional analysis shows bottom takes bigger hit than upper middle: http://t.co/cmpKgRkr

  7. RJ

    RT “@wdjstraw: Treasury distributional analysis shows bottom takes bigger hit than upper middle: http://t.co/UlZ2l2Ph”

  8. Mike Morgan-Giles

    Treasury distributional analysis shows bottom takes bigger hit than upper middle: http://t.co/cmpKgRkr

  9. Lucy Powell

    Treasury distributional analysis shows bottom takes bigger hit than upper middle: http://t.co/cmpKgRkr

  10. Helen Dennis

    Treasury distributional analysis shows bottom takes bigger hit than upper middle: http://t.co/cmpKgRkr

  11. Newsbot9

    Lol, madlibbing eh Blag? Or a bot, either way.

  12. Christopher Mahon

    Treasury distributional analysis shows bottom takes bigger hit than upper middle: http://t.co/cmpKgRkr

  13. Tom Greatrex MP

    Treasury distributional analysis shows bottom takes bigger hit than upper middle: http://t.co/cmpKgRkr

  14. Praisegod Barebones

    RT “@wdjstraw: Treasury distributional analysis shows bottom takes bigger hit than upper middle: http://t.co/UlZ2l2Ph”

  15. Wladyslaw Mejka

    Treasury distributional analysis shows bottom takes bigger hit than upper middle: http://t.co/cmpKgRkr

  16. Osborne proved the doommongers wrong, the economy is even worse | Left Foot Forward

    […] also: • “We’re all in this together” – when ‘we’ means the bottom 80% – Will Straw, November 29th […]

  17. Duncan Keeling

    RT @leftfootfwd: "We're all in this together" – when 'we' means the bottom 80% http://t.co/Ew2PDxiG #austerity

  18. Guy Manchester

    Again, Mr Osbourne, you are shown to be lying when you claim "those with the broadest shoulders…." http://t.co/OvXWJM8b

  19. Devolved nations recoil from autumn statement | Left Foot Forward

    […] “We’re all in this together” – when ‘we’ means the bottom 80% – Will Straw, November 29th […]

  20. The SNP one-ups Osborne on infrastructure investment | Left Foot Forward

    […] “We’re all in this together” – when ‘we’ means the bottom 80% – Will Straw, November 29th […]

  21. Economic update, December 2011 – UK teeters on brink of recession | Left Foot Forward

    […] “We’re all in this together” – when ‘we’ means the bottom 80% – Will Straw, November 29th […]

  22. Sue Davies

    It's not just the bottom third paying more – it's the bottom 80%:
    http://t.co/MIe94la8 #pmqs

  23. Peter Collins

    It's not just the bottom third paying more – it's the bottom 80%:
    http://t.co/MIe94la8 #pmqs

  24. bitfuzzy

    It's not just the bottom third paying more – it's the bottom 80%:
    http://t.co/MIe94la8 #pmqs

  25. Cameron ignores evidence literally in front of his face | Left Foot Forward

    […] also: • “We’re all in this together” – when ‘we’ means the bottom 80% – Will Straw, November 29th […]

  26. LocaliseWestMidlands

    It's not just the bottom third paying more – it's the bottom 80%:
    http://t.co/MIe94la8 #pmqs

  27. Janet Graham

    It's not just the bottom third paying more – it's the bottom 80%:
    http://t.co/MIe94la8 #pmqs

  28. SERTUC Young Members

    RT @leftfootfwd: It's not just the bottom third paying more – it's the bottom 80%:
    http://t.co/lW0q9Lyc #pmqs

  29. Justin B

    RT @SERTUCyouth: RT @leftfootfwd: It's not just the bottom third paying more – it's the bottom 80%:
    http://t.co/VpjztCJX #pmqs

  30. Stephe Meloy

    RT @leftfootfwd: "We're all in this together" – when 'we' means the bottom 80% http://t.co/lfNAHma2

  31. George Osborne is the downgraded chancellor of a deflationary government | Left Foot Forward

    […] “We’re all in this together” – when ‘we’ means the bottom 80% – Will Straw, November 29th […]

  32. The new politics of protest | Left Foot Forward

    […] would argue that people on low incomes are bearing the brunt of the government’s austerity programme. So have […]

  33. The charts that shame the “we’re all in this together” coalition | Left Foot Forward

    […] See also: • Autumn statement 2011: “We’re all in this together” – when ‘we’ means the bottom 80% 29 Nov […]

Leave a Reply