The coalition is actively increasing child poverty

The Resolution Foundation’s Felicity Dennistoun explains the IFS’s figures for child poverty, and puts them in the context of the wider welfare reforms.

By Felicity Dennistoun of the Resolution Foundation

As has been widely reported, new figures published today by the Institute for Fiscal Studies forecast that the number of children in poverty is set to rise.

Specifically, child poverty will rise continually during the first half of this decade and stay at approximately the same level until 2020, when there will be over three million children living in poverty in the UK. The figures about adults are similarly depressing; by 2015 6.6 million working age adults will be living in absolute poverty.

In this context the targets set in the Child Poverty Act, just last year, of reducing absolute child poverty to 5% and relative child poverty to 10% by 2020, seem at best woefully optimistic and at worst wildly unrealistic. The reasons behind these gloomy forecasts reveal why we’re moving in the wrong direction when it comes to the eradication child poverty.

IFS figures show that real median household income is forecast to be 7% lower in 2012-13 than it was in 2009-10, and to remain below its 2009-10 level until at least 2015-16. These figures are of serious concern given that by this point the economy should have made a convincing return to growth. Stagnating wages only tell part of the story though; child poverty is an area where politics makes a big difference.

Graph 1 below shows projections for child poverty both with and without the government’s tax and benefit reforms. As the dotted line shows, without government policy child poverty would be markedly lower. So where are things going wrong? While the planned changes to be brought in under Universal Credit should take us a step forward on poverty rates, the impact of indexing benefits to CPI instead of RPI will take us two steps back.

Graph 1:

And while Universal Credit promises to make work pay, the figures reveal it just won’t do enough.

See also:

How poor children will get poorer on Cameron’s watchDr Sam Royston, October 11th 2011

Child poverty the “challenge of our generation” says McConnellEd Jacobs, June 7th 2011

New Labour’s record on child poverty: Lessons must be learntKate Bell and Jason Strelitz, May 12th 2011

OECD: Spending cuts threaten progress on child povertyWill Straw, April 28th 2011

Has the government breached its child poverty obligations?Ed Jacobs, March 25th 2011

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

23 Responses to “The coalition is actively increasing child poverty”

  1. Jacqui Dickson

    The coalition is actively increasing child poverty, writes @ResFoundation’s @FDennistoun:

  2. Chris Jewitt

    The coalition is actively increasing child poverty, writes @ResFoundation’s @FDennistoun:

  3. Michael

    The coalition is actively increasing child poverty l Left Foot Forward –

  4. KAAL Group

    The coalition is actively increasing child poverty l Left Foot Forward –

  5. Lynn Hancock

    The coalition is actively increasing child poverty l Left Foot Forward –

Comments are closed.