Osborne’s Swiss tax deal castrates international tax avoidance clampdowns

George Osborne’s Swiss tax deal is allowing these individuals to buy their anonymity - but the question remains, why would they want to be anonymous?

The government has been crowing about getting tough with tax evaders, with its Swiss tax deal. The Conservative press team tweeted:

“A few years ago, nobody would have anticipated we would conclude an agreement with Switzerland to tackle tax evasion.”

And, namechecking David Blackburn over at the Coffee House blog, questioned the actions of the last prime Minister:

“David Blackburn asks why the Swiss bank deal wasn’t done sooner. Gordon Brown has some questions to answer”

The answer may be because Brown wanted an international deal that would work for all countries, including the UK, and would not stab poorer states in the back. Christian Aid view the bargain as essentially a betrayal of the developing work, arguing it ‘amounts to collusion with criminality’.

Presently, UK residents can hold anonymous accounts in Switzerland to avoid paying tax. The deal gives these account-holders a choice – either reveal your account and how much is held in it, or the Swiss authorities will tax the account at 19 to 34 per cent, and pass on the proceeds to the UK.

Essentially George Osborne is allowing these individuals to buy their anonymity. But the question remains, why would they want to be anonymous?

Christian Aid Director Loretta Minghella said:

“This deal makes it much less likely that developing countries will ever be able to get the taxes owed to them from those hiding money in tax havens like Switzerland. It is a disgrace.

“Why would anyone rather pay a back tax of 19 to 34 per cent on the money they have hidden in Switzerland than reveal their identity, unless they have done something seriously wrong? And why is the Government letting them get away so lightly?

“The most likely reason is that they have evaded a whole lot more tax than that or been involved in other serious criminal behaviour. This is a bad deal for honest British tax payers and for scores of poor countries around the world.”

Campaigners had hoped for a comprehensive tackling of tax avoidance to be on the agenda for the G20 meeting in November, when governments could have set up an information exchange system between themselves to track down avoiders. This unilateral action by the UK government, and such alleged action by Germany, essentially sells smaller countries without the same clout down the river.

Meanwhile, Richard Murphy of Tax Research UK, also points out that the deal cuts off EU wide action at the knees:

“It’s important to say this deal was not needed. The revised European Union Savings Tax Directive is on the table. Twenty five EU states support it and it has looked very likely recently that compromise with the other two was possible and that Switzerland could have been pulled on board.

“That deal would have ensured we’d have got all the information we needed to demand all the tax due by those who have been criminally evading their tax bills by hiding funds in Swiss banks that have been deliberately and knowingly helping them to do so.

“And I think the UK-Swiss tax deal has been deliberately engineered to scupper that EU wide deal because it would have applied to Jersey, Guernsey, the Isle of Man, Cayman and all other British tax havens that comprise the branch offices of the City of London tax haven. And it would also have extended information exchange to companies and trusts – which would have shattered the tax evasion industries in these British tax havens.”

He has added that the deal not only amounts to a de facto amnesty for tax criminals, but also perpetually putting the UK finance industry at a disadvantage to its Swiss rivals, writing:

“Under this deal, the tax withholding rate to be applied to UK taxpayers holding bank accounts in Switzerland – who do not want details of their affairs disclosed in the UK – will deliberately be less than their UK marginal tax rate.

“The UK government has just handed a perpetual competitive advantage to Swiss banks over UK banks in the markets for savings in the UK. And think just how stupid that is. After all – isn’t every financial adviser now going to be duty bound to tell poeple they can save tax by putting their money in Switzerland?

“I am staggered at how stupid the Treasury have been.”

Like this article? Sign up to Left Foot Forward's weekday email for the latest progressive news and comment - and support campaigning journalism by making a donation today.

58 Responses to “Osborne’s Swiss tax deal castrates international tax avoidance clampdowns”

  1. RJ

    from the Obs: Osborne attacks 'morally repugnant' tax evasion http://t.co/GMF4j21 (NB Swiss deal has its critics, eg http://t.co/dEhzNha)

  2. Diane Lawrence

    RT @leftfootfwd: Osborne’s Swiss tax deal castrates international tax avoidance clampdowns http://t.co/r7d2wtR

  3. FT take apart Osborne’s Swiss tax deal | Left Foot Forward

    […] tax evasion, echoes Left Foot Forward’s criticisms of the deal last Thursday; as Daniel Elton wrote: “Campaigners had hoped for a comprehensive tackling of tax avoidance to be on the agenda for […]

  4. George Osborne, tax evasion and the failings of New Labour « LeftCentral

    […] Foot Forward argued that the move destroyed international efforts at a treaty. Further to these moral objections to the deal, there seem to be a series of practical leaks that […]

  5. Shamik Das

    And on the Swiss tax deal, see @DanielElton's article on why it's not as Osborne's spun it: http://t.co/KQL5m011

  6. David Powell

    And on the Swiss tax deal, see @DanielElton's article on why it's not as Osborne's spun it: http://t.co/KQL5m011

  7. LadyRoisin

    And on the Swiss tax deal, see @DanielElton's article on why it's not as Osborne's spun it: http://t.co/KQL5m011

  8. Hush Bone

    Apparently #Osborne already has a role in a new production of Oliver http://t.co/RDh2iTh6 so might not be able to play himself in #ecomovie

Leave a Reply