Left Foot Forward's Daniel Elton reports on how the coalition's higher education market ended up inflating prices and introduced pressures to increase government debt.
Remember all that lovely spin about how higher education tuition fees of more than £6,000 a year would be rare?
“Mr Willetts gave warning that universities should only charge maximum fees only in ‘exceptional circumstances’.” – The Daily Telegraph, February 21st 2011
“People keep citing £9,000. You know, £9,000 should be the exception not the rule. If you want to go through the £6,000 barrier you are going to have to jump through a lot of hoops.” – The Independent, December 5th 2010
“Simon Hughes (Bermondsey and Old Southwark) (LD): ‘One of the worries out there is that all universities might end up being allowed to charge £9,000. What assurance – what rules, what guarantees-can my Right Hon. Friend give that “exceptional” will mean “exceptional”, and that £6,000 will be the limit for most universities in the country?’
“Vince Cable: ‘That is a highly pertinent question in the light of the experience of the last government, who had a two-tier system. There was a migration of all universities to the top of the range. They operated, in effect, like a cartel, and that must be stopped.'” – Hansard, December 9th 2011
Well, it’s all turned out rather differently.
As the BBC reported this morning:
More than a third of England’s universities have had their plans to charge £9,000 for every course officially approved. Some 58% will be allowed to charge £9,000 for at least some courses in 2012, said the fees watchdog the Office for Fair Access.
One major reason why is that universities fear students will price as shorthand for quality, so resulting in universities actually competing to raise prices. As Left Foot Forward reported recently, the Vice Chancellor of De Montford University, Professor Dominic Shellard, told his student newspaper that DMU will charge £9,000 next year because:
“…whether we like it or not there’s a correlation between what you charge and people’s perception of quality. We’re quite ambitious as an institution, we want to go well beyond this notion that we’re a post-92 institution. It was a reflection of our ambition.”
We are fast heading towards a two-tier higher education sector where potential employers will ask applicants “did you go to a £9K university?”; strangely, senior Liberal Democrats said they changed thier minds on tuition fees due to the need to reduce the deficit.
Yet, with government paying fees up front and institutions competing to drive prices upwards, we have a recipe for increasing government debt, at least in the short term.
20 Responses to “How the Cable/Willetts market in higher education ended up inflating fees”
mrjelfs
How the Cable/Willetts market in higher education ended up inflating fees: http://bit.ly/pko3dY – @DanielElton reports
Michael Jeive
How the Cable/Willetts market in higher education ended up inflating fees http://t.co/UpadpIN via @leftfootfwd
Sue
How the Cable/Willetts market in higher education ended up inflating fees: http://bit.ly/pko3dY – @DanielElton reports
Robert
Once Blair opened the flood gates we all knew how long it would take for the prices to go up. I suspect in another ten years the poor will go to college the rich to University and the rich immigrants will of course have the pick.
Blair, Cable, Grove, Miliband, take your pick they are all out of the same basket.
Leon Wolfson
Another ten years? The fees were already very high, they’re now extortionate.
Even more tuition fees, on top of the already-falling percentage of university students we have, is going to necessitate a lot of revision in university policy if we’re not to simply hand EU-trained students (British-born or not, given how much cheaper doing degrees abroad is, in English) the good jobs here.