The coalition could end up borrowing more than Labour

If the economy continues to stagnate, the coalition could borrow more than Labour this year, writes Cormac Hollingsworth.

The economic argument about the timing and extent of the cuts has always been an argument about how best to cut the deficit. Many imagine this argument will be settled when we look at the numbers in March 2015.

However, it may actually be decided by what happens in the next nine months. That is because what happens this year, in revealing the economy’s capacity to generate tax receipts and the coalition government’s ability to control spending, will ripple through the next four financial years.

If the economy continues to stagnate, the coalition could borrow more than Labour this year.

Prior to the Osborne June Budget, the Office of Budget Responsibility made a prediction (see pdf) of what Alistair Darling’s borrowing would have been for fiscal 2011; they estimated borrowing of 8.3% of GDP with a growth rate of 2.6%.

Borrowing would then fall to 3.9% of GDP by 2014/15. It’s of more than passing academic interest that while the OBR thought borrowing would fall more than Mr Darling’s halving of the deficit promise.

It is of more direct relevance that if the government borrows more than 8.3% this year – more than Labour would have – then it will make it much harder for them to reach their commitment to eliminate the deficit.

The coalition’s spending plans are factored into the OBR’s new predictions that have followed the June budget, the November spending review and the March budget. Each time they made a lower prediction of growth for 2011 and a higher prediction for borrowing. Graph 1 below shows how the OBR estimates borrowing changes with growth.

The Treasury has indicated consensus growth for 2011 is 1.3%. Growth at that level for fiscal 2011 would result in borrowing of 8.15% of GDP, just below that predicted for Mr Darling’s budget.

From the OBR’s estimates we can project that if growth for fiscal 2011 is below 1.1% then we could be in a scenario where the coalition is borrowing more than Labour.

Graph 1:

George-Osborne-growth-headache
A word of caution, however, is needed.

Next month is a high month for tax receipts because many companies pay their corporation tax in June, so one must be careful not to read too much into what is going on in the economy. Nonetheless, by this time in 2010, borrowing was already £1.8 billion below 2009 borrowing; the borrowing numbers reported last week show borrowing only managed to fall by £370 million so far this year.

For Public Sector Net Borrowing to fall to the OBR’s prediction of £122 billion, the government must borrow £6.25 billion less in each of the final three quarters of fiscal 2011. That could be a tough target.

In fiscal 2010 that borrowing reduction was only achieved in the final quarter, January-March. Time will tell, but there’s clearly a chance the government is about to lose control of public borrowing.

So what will it mean if stagnant growth keeps the deficit too high, with levels of borrowing higher than under Labour? This will be a sign of collapsing confidence in both the business and consumer sectors, and fear of this scenario is obviously what is driving Labour’s plan B.

But if confidence does indeed continue to fall there will need to be a rethink on both sides of the aisle over what policies will re-engage the private investment that would be needed to stop the economy from stagnating with high borrowing.

Two related policies suggest themselves:  a National Investment Bank as suggested by Gerald Holtham and Lord Skidelsky, together with a Co-operative Housing Bank. The institutions themselves would take time to set up, so the government would need to partner with existing banks to distribute the initial loans, but they do offer us a road out of this avoidable downturn.

Like this article? Sign up to Left Foot Forward's weekday email for the latest progressive news and comment - and support campaigning journalism by making a donation today. 

72 Responses to “The coalition could end up borrowing more than Labour”

  1. Leon Wolfson

    Yes, yes, you can copy/paste your madlibs. That’s about the competence level you have generally, it seems.

    Go away BNP boy, adults are discussing issues. You can’t even read my posts, of course, because I certainly didn’t dispute the facts, but pointed out WHY.

  2. Kevin Richards

    What legacy will you leave after 5 years David & George – The coalition could end up borrowing more than Labour http://t.co/MCfwqC1

  3. Anon E Mouse

    Leon Wolfson –

    —- I AGREE WITH THE AUTHOR OF THIS ARTICLE – HE IS RIGHT IN HIS ASSERTION THAT THIS COALITION IS SPENDING MORE THAN THE LAST LABOUR GOVERNMENT—-

    PLEASE read the article BEFORE you criticise me for AGREEING with the author and his article.

    In the meantime: WATCH OUT FOR THE MONSTERS IN THE BUSHES BEHIND YOU WOLFY!!! MMMMWWWWHAHAHAHA!! 😉

  4. Karl Eastham

    Coalition could end up borrowing more than Labour @CormacHolly in @leftfootfwd http://t.co/cTVUY9I

  5. Richard

    “and loners of that ilk spring to mind”

    Speak for yourself Mickey Mouse. All you do all day every day is sit on the web, alone with your computer,commenting on any political site going. Now that is a sad life.

  6. Osborne's 'march of the makers' is beating a retreat | Left Foot Forward

    […] sector fell in July. This was the first contraction since July 2009, but also followed bad figures for the economy last week as a […]

  7. Paul F Holmes

    Required Reading: Coalition could end up borrowing more than Labour >> http://t.co/wN12JuP from the very insightful @CormacHolly #fb

  8. Higher borrowing than under Labour threatens credibility of UK plc. | Left Foot Forward

    […] Left Foot Forward last month, I highlighted the risks on the budget deficit of low growth. It now looks like the poor growth we have had for […]

  9. OECD prediction rocks Osborne's deficit reduction hopes | Left Foot Forward

    […] Hollinsgworth has shown on Left Foot Forward, if the prediction is accurate then Osborne will be unable to cut the deficit at […]

  10. Look Left – World unites to remember the day time stood still | Left Foot Forward

    […] it will mean the UK economy will have grown only 0.9% this year; as a result, as Left Foot Forward showed in July, the chancellor will be unable to cut the deficit at […]

  11. We need to invest in infrastructure if there's any hope of reducing the deficit | Left Foot Forward

    […] A downgrade in the output gap suggests a fall in expectation of aggregate output. It’s the latest sign of what we’ve been worried about since July: the  public sector cuts collapsing aggregate demand which feeds into higher borrowing. […]

  12. Mabel Horrocks

    If Cameron says you can't borrow your way out of debt, he should tell George Osborne: http://t.co/CTIKtMmd #cpc11 #con11

  13. Mark Worgan

    If Cameron says you can't borrow your way out of debt, he should tell George Osborne: http://t.co/CTIKtMmd #cpc11 #con11

  14. Jamal Barry

    If Cameron says you can't borrow your way out of debt, he should tell George Osborne: http://t.co/CTIKtMmd #cpc11 #con11

  15. Denis donovan

    If Cameron says you can't borrow your way out of debt, he should tell George Osborne: http://t.co/CTIKtMmd #cpc11 #con11

  16. Ma

    If Cameron says you can't borrow your way out of debt, he should tell George Osborne: http://t.co/CTIKtMmd #cpc11 #con11

  17. .

    If Cameron says you can't borrow your way out of debt, he should tell George Osborne: http://t.co/CTIKtMmd #cpc11 #con11

  18. Sylvia Turner

    If Cameron says you can't borrow your way out of debt, he should tell George Osborne: http://t.co/CTIKtMmd #cpc11 #con11

  19. Cameron's speech churns out the old Tory myths | Left Foot Forward

    […] are being repeatedly downgraded, and so is the projected reduction in deficit reduction. As Cormac Hollingsworth wrote on Left Foot Forward in July: “The coalition’s spending plans are factored into the […]

  20. Osborne is perilously close to failing to cut borrowing at all | Left Foot Forward

    […] July this year we predicted that at some stage this year the government would have to concede because their gamble had failed. […]

  21. Five reasons to oppose the welfare bill | Left Foot Forward

    […] is a direct example of how the counter-productive attempt at rapid deficit reduction is being balanced on the backs of the poorest. There are many problems […]

  22. Mandelson weighs in behind National Investment Bank | Left Foot Forward

    […] The coalition could end up borrowing more than Labour – Cormac Hollingsworth, July 27th […]

Leave a Reply