Ed Miliband will challenge his party to look outward not inward, become a "genuine movement" and be more open to the public in a speech to Labour activists today.
Ed Miliband will challenge his party to look outward not inward, become a “genuine movement” and be more open to the public in a speech to Labour activists in Wrexham today. Building on the momentum gained from his speech on responsibility last week, improved PMQs performances and the abolition of shadow cabinet elections, he will further outline his determination to win the next election by listening as well as leading.
Mr Miliband will tell the Labour Party National Policy Forum this lunchtime:
“In the 1980s, people in our party argued that for too long, we had been centralised, top-down and dominated by the leadership. They argued for giving more powers to members. Some of it was right, some of it was wrong. But one crucial element was missing: the connection between members and the public. We became better at empowering our members, but disconnected from the public. Three painful election defeats followed.
“New Labour re-connected us with the hopes and aspirations of the people. We won three elections. But too often we shut the door on the party and ignored what our members were saying. At times it felt like the role of the leadership was to protect the public from the party.
“We went from six people making decisions in a smoke-filled committee room to six people making the decisions from a sofa in Whitehall. Sometimes less than six.
“But the party was trying to tell us what the people wanted us to know. They were telling us about immigration, about housing benefits and about the 10p tax. We didn’t listen. And we lost the last election. Old Labour forgot about the public. New Labour forgot about the party. And, by the time left office, we had lost touch with both.
“I will lead a party which is more open to the public. And my leadership will be more open and in touch with the party.”
And looking ahead to the next election, he will say:
“Labour cannot hope that power will come automatically or that all we need is one more heave or that the pendulum will swing back in our favour. We can only win if we change. Our political culture must become less inward-looking and our decision-making more open. The party I intend to build together with you will be one that faces outwards to the people it serves and works together in pursuit of its common goals.
“I want us to be an alternative government… I am determined we win the next election. I am determined we are a one-term opposition.
“But I know this also: we cannot change this society in the ways we want to unless we become a genuine movement. A movement that starts with party members. That reaches out to our supporters in country. That goes beyond them to new recruits. Millions of people that argue our case up and down this country. We cannot do that either with central control from the top. Or a party that looks inward to itself.
“Lets be clear what our ambition is: To be more than a party. Labour must be a cause. We must be a movement. Because then, together, we can face up the big challenges facing Britain in the future and build the country the people deserve.”
In an interview with this morning’s Guardian, meanwhile, the Labour leader sets out his reform agenda, vowing to reform the party to connect with the public; modernise Labour’s relations with the unions – asking them to “open up”; reinvigorate party conference – including allowing NGOs like Greenpeace to address conference; getting local parties to draw up registers of local supporters; are requiring all PPCs and councillors to sign a code of conduct.
He tells the paper:
“I want to open up the leadership to the party and the party to the country. In a society that is changing so fast in so many ways, we cannot continue as we are, with essentially a closed structure that was formed a century ago… I have a clear sense of where the country needs to go and what needs to happen to the party…
“I want to be a one-term opposition, and there is no way I want shadow cabinet members looking over their shoulder and thinking about anything other than winning the next election.”
On the question of the impending wave of strikes over pensions, he adds:
“The most important thing for the unions is to get the public to understand what their argument is. I don’t think the argument has yet been got across on public sector pensions as to some of the injustices contained on what the government is doing.
“Personally I don’t think actually strike action is going to help win that argument and I think it inconveniences the public. I think strikes must always be the very last resort.”
Like this article? Sign up to Left Foot Forward's weekday email for the latest progressive news and comment - and support campaigning journalism by making a donation today.
“All pop stars should pay their fair share of tax, but I do not know the details… In the last decade we have seen chief executive pay go from 69 times the average to 147 times the average.
“We need a debate whether these levels of pay awards are linked to achievement because in some cases they are not.”