Are women being under-represented in politics and what can help redress the in balance - Ronit Wolfson investigates.
Looking around the audience at the Progress annual conference this weekend I was struck, as I often am at these type of events, at how few female faces I saw. From what I can gather, the Fabian Society conference the week before wasn’t much better. The question we need to ask ourselves is not can Progress (or the Fabians) do more – events like Progress’ recent women’s only selection training are just one example of the support women on the left can expect from the organisation.
The real question is at a conference which is self-selecting, why were less than a third of attendees women? Stephen Twigg MP commented that at the foreign policy break out session, at which he was speaking, there was a distinct lack of women both on the panel and in the audience (six women compared with 33 men). I don’t think that these numbers would have changed much had the panel included Harriet Harman or Jen Gerber.
The Tory-led government is not standing up for women, is not speaking for women and is not representing women. While Ken Clarke’s comments could be read as a bit of an own goal from an experienced politician, regressive views about women still appear to be prevalent among Tories – recent comments by Nadine Dorries and Roger Helmer MEP are but two examples.
Sexist dinosaurs aside, women are being disproportionately affected by the cuts. I do not believe that only women can speak for women, but any party that claims to do so must be representative.
There are not enough women in politics – at all levels. The fact that are only three women in the Scottish shadow cabinet is an embarrassment and undermines our feminist credentials. Yes, we need more support and more visible role models but to some extent, sisters need to do it for themselves.
Liv Bailey stood up this weekend and asked Ed Miliband if Labour was a feminist party. I believe we are, and that the values of feminism are, for most of us, at the heart of what we stand for. So as we rebuild and regroup in opposition we must seek to rectify the massive under representation of women in our movement. But it starts with us.
They say that decisions are made by those who turn up, and I hope that at the next Progress annual conference more of us decide to do so.
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
26 Responses to “Where are all the women?”
Riven
Where are all the women? http://bit.ly/l19WU1 by @RonitWolfson #PAC11
Sue Curry
RT @leftfootfwd: Where are all the women? http://t.co/l6Ajsy4
Dave Citizen
One way to increase the proportion of women involved in decision making in our democracy is to do what has been shown to work elsewhere – Nordic countries such as Sweden have successfully used quota systems to transform levels of women in parliament and wider politics.
In Britain there are probably other barriers that need to be tackled at the same time – like our FPTP voting system (oops) and the informal quota systems that fast tracks old Etonians and the like into safe seats.
Women may also be put off by the rather out-dated, aggressive-defensive style of politics still taking place in Parliament and beyond. This method of debating is particularly hard to penetrate with anything other than more of the same.
Adele Reynolds
RT @leftfootfwd Where are all the women? http://t.co/zSkvVZA by @RonitWolfson #PAC11 > as stated by @livbailey lab must be feminist party
Olivia Bailey
RT @leftfootfwd Where are all the women? http://t.co/zSkvVZA by @RonitWolfson #PAC11 > as stated by @livbailey lab must be feminist party