Joss Garman looks at the rifts and suprising divisions in the coalition government over environmental issues.
The Liberal Democrats have long been seen as the greenest of the main three parties, and went into the election with strong promises about clean energy and ambitions to protect the environment and boost green industries. So how counter-intuitive to read on today’s Guardian front page that Vince Cable has been privately lobbying to water down the UK’s most important climate change targets, while William Hague has sought to defend them.
The FT (£) and Today Programme also reported today how leaked letters show that Vince Cable is arguing that the prime minister should reject on Monday the key recommendations of the government’s independent advisers on how to meet their legal obligations under the Climate Act.
The debate centres on recommendations from the Committee on Climate Change (CCC) that the government should adopt:
• An indicative 2030 target to reduce emissions by 60 per cent relative to 1990 levels;
• A fourth carbon budget of 1,950 million tonnes of carbon dioxide on a gross basis (i.e. without purchasing offsets but done domestically) between 2023 and 2027.
This decision has been described by the head of the CCC – David Kennedy – as “the key test of the government’s commitment to the low-carbon agenda”, and yesterday the director of Friends of the Earth said Huhne should resign out of principle if he failed to persuade the prime minister to follow the CCC’s advice.
Left Foot Forward has learned that it’s not just the foreign secretary backing Huhne, but also Grant Shapps, Caroline Spelman and Oliver Letwin. However, officials in HMT and the Transport Department are lobbying against them and as with the argument over the Green Bank (an argument Huhne lost), it will ultimately be Cameron’s decision when it comes on Monday.
Cable’s remarks will be deeply embarrassing for the Lib Dem leadership, coming as they do just 24 hours after Nick Clegg told Andrew Marr he wanted to put a new sense of priority on the green agenda, and on the same day (and in the same paper) that Danny Alexander told Patrick Wintour he wanted to see a new focus on the environment. It’s also interesting timing for David Cameron as Saturday will mark one year since he promised to lead “the greenest government ever”.
As tensions rise in the coalition, the low-carbon agenda could be seen as part of the glue that could bind the leadership together offering common ground for Tory modernisers and the Lib Dems and an opportunity for the Lib Dems to put some clear water between themselves and the Tory Right. It seems Vince Cable doesn’t see it like that but Monday’s decision from the prime minister will be key.
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
18 Responses to “Vince Cable caught seeking to scupper UK’s climate efforts”
Brandi Evans
Vince Cable caught seeking to scupper UK's climate efforts: The Liberal Democrats have long … http://bit.ly/lHttLQ my site, DIY Videos
Ben Niblett
RT @leftfootfwd: Vince Cable caught seeking to scupper UK’s climate efforts: http://bit.ly/los4ZU writes @JossGarman
London IWW
Vince Cable caught seeking to scupper UK’s climate efforts | http://ow.ly/4R56E | #ClimateChange #GlobalWarming #ConDem
Anon E Mouse
Joss Garman – So in your eco toff world no one is allowed freedom of speech without facing the “wrath” of the “progressive” Guardian reading minority?
It seems the shrill hysteria that follows this climate change nonsense never ceases, irrespective of the economy.
This is a Labour supporting blog – it seems strange that the days of Labour supporting people who eat fish and chips have been overtaken by rich kids eating muesli and earnestly predicting the end of the world.
It looks pathetic that you care more about an increase in temperature (when the world has got colder again) than about people getting jobs and supporting themselves. Not that that is a concept you’re familiar with I suppose…
Northern Worker
Anon, couldn’t have put it better myself. I despair that the so-called party of the workers seems detemined to reduce us all to poverty because otherwise the planet will self destruct. Jobs are much more important than carbon footprints when we have no clue as to whether living on the breadline will make any difference. And as Anon says the party seems to have been hijacked by Guardian reading chattering classes. I’ll go with Vince at least he’s had a proper job.