EMA replacement could breach equality law according to government

James Mills reports on the potential for discrimination in the Education Maintenance Allowance (EMA) replacement, that could force the government into another u-turn into the issue.

By James Mills of the Save EMA campaign

According to the government’s own Equality Impact Assessment (EIA) into the Education Maintenance Allowance (EMA) Replacement Scheme by the Department for Education, the replacement to EMA “could be discriminatory” and lead to a possible breach of equality laws. This could force, as Save EMA discovered and as covered by the BBC, Michael Gove into yet another u-turn on this policy due to legal action, this time posed by the Equality Act.

One of the main arguments made by the government for replacing EMA is that they are “better targeting” the EMA, by making the awarding of discretionary payments locally, at the discretion of local schools and colleges. Instead of the current EMA scheme which distributes payments centrally by simple, open and transparent means tests.

However, the Save EMA campaign discovered, while studying the recent EIA report, that Michael Gove and the government could be u-turning again on EMA just over a month after we forced them into a u-turn.

This is section 51 of the EIA under the heading Local Administration:

“It will be at the discretion of colleges to determine the relative merits of applications for financial support. This process is therefore open to unintended discrimination on the basis of disability; gender; ethnicity or other characteristics protected under equality law.

We will consider whether there should be some central arbitration of the discretionary administration of funding or at least ensure transparency of administration to evaluate the impact achieved by providers, including value for public money.

To remind you how big a sea change in government policy this could be, this is what Michael Gove said only on the March 28th 2011:

“Schools and colleges will have the freedom to decide on the allocation of the bursary,” he added: “They are best placed to know the specific needs of their students, and we will give professionals full flexibility over allocating support.”

For those who don’t know, an Equality Impact Assessment is conducted by a government department ahead of the introduction of a certain initiative. It examines the likely or actual effects of policies or services on people in respect of disability, gender and racial equality to identify what effect its implementation may have on different groups in the country.

It helps the government department make sure the needs of people are taken into account when they make a change to a current policy or service or when they develop and implement a new policy or service like they are doing with EMA.

This report was done by the Department for Education themselves, which makes it all the more damning as this basically is the department acknowledging that their own policy could discriminate against the most vulnerable groups which EMA was intended to target and help remain in education.

Save EMA have been saying since day one that there would be grave equality issues to removing EMA and the government has finally admitted this by whispering it in their own EIA, hoping that no one would notice.

The proposed plans for the replacement of EMA will force local, more junior staff to make vital decisions over the future of some of the most vulnerable teenagers in our country, at a time when they will already be over-worked. One just has to look at the views of self described “Tory Teacher” Katherine Birbalsingh to realise that the potential for discrimination, through the lack of transparency in locally administered discretionary payments, is severe.

It would be comical if this was not such a serious matter. Even this government’s own figures show that after the national roll out of EMA in 2004 participation of 16-18-year-olds in full-time education rose.

This government has taken a scheme viewed as successful by the IFS and created something now which “could be discriminatory”.

22 Responses to “EMA replacement could breach equality law according to government”

  1. The F-Word

    RT @leftfootfwd: EMA replacement could breach equality law according to government: http://bit.ly/iD3Vwy writes @SaveEMA's @JamesMills1984

  2. Philippa

    RT @leftfootfwd: EMA replacement could breach equality law according to government: http://bit.ly/iD3Vwy writes @SaveEMA's @JamesMills1984

  3. Gianni Spinelli

    RT @leftfootfwd: EMA replacement could breach equality law according to government: http://bit.ly/iD3Vwy writes @SaveEMA's @JamesMills1984

  4. James Mills

    RT @GianniSpinelli1: RT @leftfootfwd: EMA replacement could breach equality law according to government: http://bit.ly/iD3Vwy writes @Sa …

  5. Sarah Bickerstaffe

    RT @leftfootfwd: EMA replacement could breach equality law according to government: http://bit.ly/iD3Vwy writes @SaveEMA's @JamesMills1984

  6. Ed's Talking Balls

    A scheme which ‘could be discriminatory’.

    I find this odd. I thought the whole point of the changes being made was to allow schools to discriminate between cases. If two cases are different they should be treated differently, surely? Clearly this should not be done irrationally, i.e. denying a girl EMA while allowing a boy in the same circumstances to receive it. Nonetheless, discrimination, when not arbitrary but part of a considered process, is a necessary part of the new system.

    Besides, I think these equality laws are going to prove a minefield. I was incredulous when I read that the Fawcett Society was seeking to challenge the budget on the basis that it entailed cutting public sector jobs and reforming benefits would have a disproportionate impact on women. Happily, common sense prevailed and the application for judicial review was dismissed.

    What next? Should I complain about the schools budget because it discriminates against the elderly?

  7. Mason Dixon, Autistic

    In semi-related news, the replacement for Disability Living Allowance is likely to reverse court decisions made about it because the Personal Independence Payment is an entirely new benefit and therefore the legal challenges that shaped DLA from being fiendishly difficult to claim to merely draconian will not apply. I’ve pointed this out to my MP who says he will speak with Maria Miller about it. Also gonna make me a blog post before someone else cottons onto this.

  8. False Economy

    RT @leftfootfwd EMA replacement could breach equality law according to government: http://bit.ly/iD3Vwy writes @SaveEMA's @JamesMills1984

  9. manishta sunnia

    RT @FalseEcon: RT @leftfootfwd EMA replacement could breach equality law according to government: http://bit.ly/iD3Vwy writes @SaveEMA's …

  10. Sue Pellegrino

    RT @FalseEcon: RT @leftfootfwd EMA replacement could breach equality law according to government: http://bit.ly/iD3Vwy writes @SaveEMA's …

  11. UNISON - the union

    RT @leftfootfwd: EMA replacement could breach equality law according to government http://bit.ly/jg5BJn

  12. UNISON MillionVoices

    RT @unisontweets: RT @leftfootfwd: EMA replacement could breach equality law according to government http://bit.ly/jg5BJn

  13. Aga

    RT @FalseEcon: RT @leftfootfwd EMA replacement could breach equality law according to government: http://bit.ly/iD3Vwy writes @SaveEMA's …

  14. milli tant

    RT @unisontweets: RT @leftfootfwd: EMA replacement could breach equality law according to government http://bit.ly/jg5BJn

  15. Admit it, Labour dropped the ball | Liberal Conspiracy

    […] aren’t offering open goals either. The economy is still stuck in a rut; Michael Gove is facing lawsuits over cuts to EMA; the NHS proposals are in shambles and Andrew Lansley looks like he’s on his way […]

  16. Juan Voet

    RT @FalseEcon: RT @leftfootfwd EMA replacement could breach equality law according to government: http://bit.ly/iD3Vwy writes @SaveEMA's …

  17. Daniel Pitt

    EMA replacement could breach equality law according to government: http://bit.ly/iD3Vwy #ConDemNation

  18. Sooper8

    RT @FalseEcon: RT @leftfootfwd EMA replacement could breach equality law according to government: http://bit.ly/iD3Vwy writes @SaveEMA's …

  19. Save EMA

    RT @leftfootfwd: EMA replacement could breach equality law according to government: http://bit.ly/iD3Vwy writes @SaveEMA's @JamesMills1984

  20. cutchswife

    RT @leftfootfwd: EMA replacement could breach equality law according to government: http://bit.ly/iD3Vwy writes @SaveEMA's @JamesMills1984

  21. UCU

    RT @leftfootfwd: EMA replacement could breach equality law according to government: http://bit.ly/iD3Vwy writes @SaveEMA's @JamesMills1984

  22. stlemur

    RT @leftfootfwd: EMA replacement could breach equality law according to government: http://bit.ly/iD3Vwy writes @SaveEMA's @JamesMills1984

Leave a Reply