David Taylor, chair of the Labour Campaign for International Development, on why David Cameron should stand firm on the 0.7 per cent international development target.
David Taylor is the chair of the Labour Campaign for International Development (@LabourCID)
The commitment for the UK to enshrine in law our promise to spend 0.7% of GNI on overseas development assistance was in both the Conservative general election manifesto and the coalition agreement.
The attempt by your defence secretary to dump this pledge by stealth (Leaked letter [£] in The Times, 17 May) undermines government policy on international development and threatens to undo Britain’s proud position as global leaders on this issue. Playing politics with people’s lives is simply unacceptable.
Dr Fox’s letter complains that improvements in transparency and accountability at the Department for International Development will prevent him from reporting defence spending as ODA. This runs completely counter to attempts to maximise value for money at DFID (and across HMG) and the chancellor’s Google speech yesterday on access to information.
It is shocking that Fox would prefer a situation where the aid budget is cut up in back room deals owing more to Conservative party machinations than to the most effective ways to allocate British taxpayers’ money.
Fox also creates a false choice between development spending and defence. It is not a decision between aircraft carriers and schools and hospitals, as he insinuates. By making smart investments in poor countries the UK can help prevent future conflicts and extremism. You will know that DFID has explicitly chosen to target fragile and conflict states for his reason.
This is one of the most fundamental elements of a smart power strategy in the 21st century – and it is extraordinary that your defence secretary has chosen to play cheap politics rather than recognise this. We ask you to urgently clarify the government’s timetable for introducing the 0.7 bill – a piece of legislation that today’s events have proven is now needed more than ever.
Yours sincerely,
The Labour Campaign for International Development
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
19 Responses to “An open letter to David Cameron on the importance of the 0.7% target”
Tom Baker
RT @leftfootfwd: An open letter to David Cameron on the importance of the 0.7% target: http://bit.ly/lJF97H by @LabourCID's @DavidTaylor85
Ed's Talking Balls
Nonsense.
Liam Fox is completely right on this.
There are better uses to which the government could put taxpayers’ money than, for example, giving it to states which harbour terrorists and spend much of their money on weapons.
Besides, governments should not commit themselves to spending proportion X of their budget on cause Y, etc. They should leave themselves free to allocate resources in whatever way is appropriate.
Robbie Barkell
RT @LabourCID: An open letter from @LabourCID to David Cameron on the importance of the 0.7% target http://fb.me/11Vaprces
Νέα Νέμεσις Εργασίας
Govt announcement on International Aid great news for Learjet and Mercedes salesmen @leftfootfwd http://bit.ly/lJF97H #ukuncut
Jiesheng
Here are my three replies.
http://ipeanddevelopment.wordpress.com/2011/05/17/will-the-real-shadow-secretary-of-state-for-international-development-please-stand-up/
http://ipeanddevelopment.wordpress.com/2011/03/08/shadowing-dfid-mitchell-vs-harman/
http://ipeanddevelopment.wordpress.com/2011/05/17/will-the-real-shadow-secretary-of-state-for-international-development-please-stand-up/
David Taylor, personally, I wish to have a debate with you over the defintition of development and the use of aid
(Note: I am neither Labour nor Tory nor Lib Dem.)