Clarke’s problem is not that he’s tough or soft – it’s that he’s a cutter

Rehabilitation costs money. A 'prison works' strategy costs money - as Clarke says it costs more to send a convict to jail than a schoolboy to Eton. The problem with Clarke is not that he's soft or tough - its that he's a cutter.

Not a great day for the 'big beast'

The debate over Ken Clarke’s rape comments has quickly collapsed this morning into whether he is tough enough on crime. The Sun this morning says that “Ken must go” as “Labour is now tougher on crime than our Tory-led Government”. Stephen Glover in the Daily Mail writes:

“The Justice Secretary’s shortcomings are obvious, as well as saddening in a man who has been so formidable a politician. Less obvious, but actually more alarming, is Mr Cameron’s apparent willingness to go along with softer sentences for serious crimes such as rape. He can rail against the bumbling Mr Clarke as much as he likes. The real question behind yesterday’s drama is whether this Tory Prime Minister has a law and order policy worthy of the name.”

Meanwhile, liberals have jumped to his defence. Steve Richards, writing in the Independent, accused Ed Miliband of going too far by asking for Clarke’s resignation arguing:

“This was over the top, not least because Clarke is a genuinely liberal voice in a Conservative Party that could easily veer in a panic towards the populist, authoritarian right.”

But to paint Clarke as a liberal Justice Secretary – or a conservative one for that matter – is not the issue in hand. The overiding factor in the  Coalition’s policy is the drive to cut costs. Under Clarke’s leadership, the Ministry of Justice plans to axe 14,000 jobs, including 9,940 who work in the National Offender Management Scheme, the executive agency in charge of reducing offending. The 23 per cent cuts in the Ministry of Justice’s budget which Clarke signed up to are the fourth steepest in Whitehall among major spending departments after Communities and Local Government;  Business, Innovation and Skills; and Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (See Table One of the Comprehensive Spending Review).

It is at this time that Clarke wants to experiment with untried and untested rehabiliation tactics and strategies. They may fail due to a lack of support – putting back the cause of penal reform for a generation. The greater tragedy would be the resultant increase in crime.

Rehabilitation costs money. A ‘prison works’ strategy costs money – as Clarke says it costs more to send a convict to jail than a schoolboy to Eton. The problem with Clarke is not that he’s soft or tough – its that he’s a cutter.

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

2 Responses to “Clarke’s problem is not that he’s tough or soft – it’s that he’s a cutter”

  1. Look Left – Crisis at the IMF - but who will succeed Dominique Strauss-Kahn? | Left Foot Forward

    […] the issue of Clarke’s overall record and policies, Daniel Elton wrote yesterday on Left Foot Forward: “…to paint Clarke as a liberal justice secretary – or […]

  2. Geoffrey Payne

    What you identify as a problem with Ken Clarke is actually a problem for the whole government as far as cuts are concerned. However shifting the debate onto cuts evades the debate about whether Ken Clarke should resign over what he said about rape.

Comments are closed.