Darren Johnson, a Green Party member of the London Assembly, asks: Should we give equal priority to income inequality and tackle the pay of people at the top, in the belief that reducing the income gap will lead to economic, social and environmental justice? And can we find we right policies to achieve this?
Darren Johnson AM represents the Green Party in the London Assembly
Most economic analysis on Left Foot Forward focuses on our traditional concern with the poor and on the public services that help them. We tackle poverty by promoting the London Living Wage and building social housing, health inequality by improving the NHS and reducing deadly air pollution, and so on.
But should we give equal priority to income inequality and tackle the pay of people at the top, in the belief that reducing the income gap will lead to economic, social and environmental justice? And can we find we right policies to achieve this?
I am hosting a debate tonight to grapple with those questions in City Hall, working on behalf of a city with the starkest inequality of any region in the UK.
I represent Londoners earning the minimum wage who can’t make ends meet in London, stuck a full seven thousand pounds below the “low wage threshold” that is usually defined as two thirds of the median wage. The intense concentration of wealth has even left young people on incomes that make them better off than 88 per cent of the UK population eligible for “affordable housing”, because they might struggle to buy market housing.
Our comfort zone is to get more workers onto the London Living Wage, which has put millions into the pockets of low paid workers, and to build more housing in the hope that supply might get closer to demand.
But adherents to The Spirit Level argument suggest we need to think more about the people at the top of the income scale, because a smaller gap between the bottom and the top will lead to a healthier and happier city with less crime, better education results and so on.
Even in a society with excellent public services and a decent quality of life for all, a huge gulf between the bottom and the top would cause the society to suffer from a range of problems.
That income gap has grown in the past few decades, particularly in the 1980s. In 1918 the richest 1% earned 19% of all income; by 1980 that had fallen to only 6% and 4% after taxes, while living standards improved markedly; but by 2005 this had risen back to 16%.
What can we do to tackle excessively high pay? As a regional politician with relatively few powers, the Mayor of London cannot introduce progressive taxation aimed at pulling down the income of top earners; he cannot reform company structures or require public disclosure of pay. Nor can our local councillors.
When I proposed a motion to introduce fair pay ratios into the Greater London Authority group, I hoped this would help us rein in the massive pay awards given to top staff in Transport for London and Crossrail; when I have pressed him the Mayor has shown little enthusiasm for implementing this, despite his support for the principle.
But would I be better spending my time scrutinising the pay of GLA staff at the bottom of the pay scale, employment brokerage schemes for the unemployed and action to insulate fuel-poor homes? Should the Spirit Level argument really change our priorities?
I think it should, and I’m looking forward to the debate in the hope that we can identify policies clearly based on evidence, not envy.
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
23 Responses to “It’s time pay inequality became a priority”
Aaron Mo
RT @TheGreenParty: An article in @leftfootfwd by @DarrenJohnsonAM – "It’s time pay inequality became a priority" – http://bit.ly/h0TMXp
Christopher Phillips
RT @TheGreenParty: An article in @leftfootfwd by @DarrenJohnsonAM – "It’s time pay inequality became a priority" – http://bit.ly/h0TMXp
Oxford Kevin
RT @TheGreenParty: An article in @leftfootfwd by @DarrenJohnsonAM – "It’s time pay inequality became a priority" – http://bit.ly/h0TMXp
lee
it’s time for the state to stop making low wages possible by subsidising them through the benefits system. if someone is in full time employment then they have to be able to live on what they are paid – the minimum wage is clearly deeply indadequate, and it’s preposterous that we levy income tax on people who earn less than a living wage (though those evil lib-dems are doing something about that, not that anyone gives them any credit for that).
so an effective living wage, then. including regional weighting.
but (and here’s where i jump from left to right) we should not just (for example) double the minimum wage and expect employers to live with it. run this reform alongside a root-n-branch reform of corporate taxation (which is wholly unfit for purpose) and removal of employer national insurance (at least on below-average earners) and we can actually have more money paid directly to working people by their employers.. instead of routing much of it through state beaurocracy.
Steve Trow
RT @TheGreenParty: An article in @leftfootfwd by @DarrenJohnsonAM – "It’s time pay inequality became a priority" – http://bit.ly/h0TMXp