Budget cuts are deeper than Cameron would have you believe

Public Services

David Cameron's statement that spending would return to 2006 levels once the budget cuts are over obscure the real contraction in public service spending.

David Cameron reassured nervous citizens in his speech on the government’s health and education reforms yesterday on the scale of the austerity faced by public services. He said:

“Of course some decisions will be difficult and involve difficulties. But when we’re done with these cuts, spending and public services will still be at the same level as it was in 2006. We will still be spending 41% of our GDP on the public sector.”

However, the 41% figure refers to all public spending – including the costs of the financial crisis such as debt repayments, which are projected to rise, and  jobseeker’s allowance spending, also projected to go up as unemployment increases.

A better measure of “spending on public services” or “spending … on the public sector” would be the Departmental Expenditure Limits which set budgets for health, education, local government, policing and other services while excluding social security and debt interest payments.

This graph, extracted from the Institute for Fiscal Studies presentation on the  2010 spending review, shows that the coalition plans to cut back departmental expenditure as a share of national income to a level close to that which Labour inherited from the Conservative government in 1990s, when, according to the prime minister “there was insufficient respect for the ethos of public services – and public service”. The vertical axis represents percentage of GDP.

Actual spending on public services, as reported in the Comprehensive Spending Review, is projected to fall from a 26.8 per cent this year to 20.5  per cent in 2014-15, below the 23.9 per cent spent in 2005-6, a drop in magnitude of around one tenth –  and much closer to the 1998-9 figure of 20.2 per cent.

No related posts.

30 Responses to “Budget cuts are deeper than Cameron would have you believe”

  1. Daniel Pitt

    RT @leftfootfwd: Budget cuts are deeper than Cameron would have you believe: http://bit.ly/forjGC reports @DanielElton

  2. John Ruddy

    RT @leftfootfwd: Budget cuts are deeper than Cameron would have you believe http://bit.ly/fVBFFU < back to 1997

  3. craigjoneslab

    Tory claims that spending cuts reduce spending to 2006 levels false, more like the mid-90s days of leaking school roofs http://bit.ly/e14TaR

  4. Stephen Lintott

    Budget cuts are deeper than Cameron would have you believe | Left Foot Forward http://tinyurl.com/48b5u9t

  5. False Economy

    RT @leftfootfwd Budget cuts are deeper than Cameron would have you believe: http://bit.ly/forjGC reports @DanielElton

Comments are closed.