The Parliamentary Voting System & Constituency Bill caused fresh controversy last night with the threat of an unprecedented House of Lords guillotine motion.
The Parliamentary Voting System and Constituency Bill caused fresh controversy last night with the threat of an unprecedented House of Lords guillotine motion of Tory Lords leader Lord Strathclyde to cut off debate on the 301-page bill that both authorises a referendum on AV on May 5th and redraws Westminster’s constituency boundaries.
The Electoral Commission has ruled that unless the bill receives Royal Assent by February 17th, no referendum may be held in May.
As Labour peer Lord Toby Harris noted on his blog, a guillotine would be:
“… a constutional car crash… [it] would be unprecedented. It has NEVER been done before. And as the whole point of the House of Lords is that it takes the time to scrutinise legislation properly, such a motion would be a constitutional outrage.”
Concerned peers are determined to scrutinise the bill properly and push for three key amendments. Left Foot Forward understands that the key amendments under consideration are:
• A change in the acceptable variation of population size of constituencies from 5% to 10% – meaning in essence less change to existing constituency boundaries;
• The reintroduction of independent constituency boundary hearings and tribunals;
• The maintenance of the House of Commons at its present size of 650 seats.
The time consuming nature of the amendment process and the lack of any constitutional precedent for a Lords guillotine increases the need for compromise. As such, the prospect of portioning the bill into two, dealing separately with the AV referendum authorisation and the constituency changes may well be the best way to both break the impasse and avoid an ugly constitutional fight.
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
15 Responses to “AV and constituency redrawing bill risks “consitutional car crash””
paulstpancras
RT @leftfootfwd: AV and constituency redrawing bill risks "consitutional car crash": http://bit.ly/goMVPA writes @MarcusARoberts
John H
RT @leftfootfwd: AV and constituency redrawing bill risks "consitutional car crash" http://bit.ly/h8qUNd
Duncan Stott
This @leftfootfwd post http://bit.ly/goMVPA lists 3 key amendments trying to be made by Labour peers. To be fair, 1st one has some validity.
Gareth Snell
RT @leftfootfwd: AV and constituency redrawing bill risks "consitutional car crash": http://bit.ly/goMVPA writes @MarcusARoberts
yesinscotland
RT @DuncanStott: This @leftfootfwd post http://bit.ly/goMVPA lists 3 key amendments trying to be made by Labour peers. To be fair, 1st o …