AV and constituency redrawing bill risks “consitutional car crash”

The Parliamentary Voting System & Constituency Bill caused fresh controversy last night with the threat of an unprecedented House of Lords guillotine motion.

The Parliamentary Voting System and Constituency Bill caused fresh controversy last night with the threat of an unprecedented House of Lords guillotine motion of Tory Lords leader Lord Strathclyde to cut off debate on the 301-page bill that both authorises a referendum on AV on May 5th and redraws Westminster’s constituency boundaries.

The Electoral Commission has ruled that unless the bill receives Royal Assent by February 17th, no referendum may be held in May.

As Labour peer Lord Toby Harris noted on his blog, a guillotine would be:

“… a constutional car crash… [it] would be unprecedented. It has NEVER been done before. And as the whole point of the House of Lords is that it takes the time to scrutinise legislation properly, such a motion would be a constitutional outrage.”

Concerned peers are determined to scrutinise the bill properly and push for three key amendments. Left Foot Forward understands that the key amendments under consideration are:

• A change in the acceptable variation of population size of constituencies from 5% to 10% – meaning in essence less change to existing constituency boundaries;

• The reintroduction of independent constituency boundary hearings and tribunals;

• The maintenance of the House of Commons at its present size of 650 seats.

The time consuming nature of the amendment process and the lack of any constitutional precedent for a Lords guillotine increases the need for compromise. As such, the prospect of portioning the bill into two, dealing separately with the AV referendum authorisation and the constituency changes may well be the best way to both break the impasse and avoid an ugly constitutional fight.

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

15 Responses to “AV and constituency redrawing bill risks “consitutional car crash””

  1. paulstpancras

    RT @leftfootfwd: AV and constituency redrawing bill risks "consitutional car crash": http://bit.ly/goMVPA writes @MarcusARoberts

  2. John H

    RT @leftfootfwd: AV and constituency redrawing bill risks "consitutional car crash" http://bit.ly/h8qUNd

  3. Duncan Stott

    This @leftfootfwd post http://bit.ly/goMVPA lists 3 key amendments trying to be made by Labour peers. To be fair, 1st one has some validity.

  4. Gareth Snell

    RT @leftfootfwd: AV and constituency redrawing bill risks "consitutional car crash": http://bit.ly/goMVPA writes @MarcusARoberts

  5. yesinscotland

    RT @DuncanStott: This @leftfootfwd post http://bit.ly/goMVPA lists 3 key amendments trying to be made by Labour peers. To be fair, 1st o …

Comments are closed.