Yesterday's leading article in The Times on the Labour Party leadership election system more reflects the paper's enduring hostility to trade unionism than a serious concern for Labour's integrity. What other proposal for extending democracy would begin by proposing a radical reduction in the electorate?
Tony Woodley is the joint general secretary of Unite
Yesterday’s leading article in The Times (£) on the Labour party leadership election system more reflects the paper’s enduring hostility to trade unionism than a serious concern for Labour’s integrity. What other proposal for extending democracy would begin by proposing a radical reduction in the electorate?
Trade unions did not vote for Ed Miliband in the leadership election. Trade unionists did, in a secret postal ballot – and they gave the new Leader a far wider majority in terms of the votes of actual individuals voting than the weighted percentages cited by The Times indicate.
The direct votes of Labour-supporting trade unionists in the leadership election should be seen as a strength not a weakness – they are analogous to the votes cast in US primaries, which no-one seems to object to, and help ensure that the party leader is connected to the broad range of sympathetic voters. Were the vote to be confined to individual members alone, no doubt The Times would claim that it was all in the hands of unrepresentative activists.
On the larger point regarding the future of New Labour, none of the politicians cited by The Times in their reports seem to have grasped the implications of the crash of 2008 for any political project based, as New Labour was, on over-reliance on markets and, in particular, the finance sector.
I would only add that it is odious to read Margaret Hodge, MP for Barking, describing unions as “irrelevant in British society” (£) when her re-election this year in the face of a BNP challenge was so dependent on supporters we in the unions mobilised from outside her own constituency, a fact she acknowledged at the time.
This letter was originally sent to The Times but failed to make it into today’s paper.
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
37 Responses to “The votes of trade unionists are a strength to Labour not a weakness”
ide_san
"The votes of trade unionists are a strength to Labour not a weakness" http://bit.ly/bYMCO1 Hear hear! Keep Labour unelectable! #RedEd #Fail
Pete
Comment by Chris on November 19, 2010 at 1:36 pm
when you come back, it would be interesting to know who was correct about the GMB envelopes, you or the guardian. Because one of you is definitely wrong. It gives a baseline to assess further comments against.
Norrie
Just discovered Left Foot Forward by chance, will certainly make future visits to the site as it seems to reflect the political views I cherish. In saying that, I must admit I have voted SNP of late, as a form of protest; damned if I’ll vote for a party that caused wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. I voted Labour in every election from 1959, when I became eligible to vote, until 1997, then Blair & Co. turned me off completely. Killing off Clause Four was utterly inexcusable! Good luck to your cause!
Norrie.
Norrie
Oops, just noticed a slight mistake in my user name, a stray t has crept in, please amend to Norrie. Apologies for oversight!
janie_s
I agree Norrie. Blair was the end of Labour. I don’t feel I can vote for anyone at the moment. Let’s hope Ed takes the party back to its roots.