Minister: Local Enterprise Partnerships lack “a clear focus” on growth

In a searing critique of government policy, business minister Mark Prisk has written to his boss, Vince Cable, warning that the introduction of Local Enterprise Partnerships (LEPs) across England to replace the eight regional development agencies has generated “considerable friction” from the business community, running the risk that they “become detached from this policy heralding likely failure [of LEPs] in large parts of England”.

In a searing critique of government policy, business minister Mark Prisk has written to his boss, Vince Cable, warning that the introduction of Local Enterprise Partnerships (LEPs) across England to replace the eight regional development agencies has generated “considerable friction” from the business community, running the risk that they “become detached from this policy heralding likely failure [of LEPs] in large parts of England”.

In a leaked letter in yesterday’s Times (£), Prisk says:

“There is a strong view amongst the business community that many LEPs lack the ambition to make significant economic impact, undermining our agenda for growth.”

The letter goes on:

“Key messages I have been made aware of include a lack of credible business representation; negotiations dominated by local politics; and a lack of a clear focus on economic growth.”

Mr Prisk, a long-time opponent of regional development agencies, is an unlikely emissary of such tidings, however the timing of his letter is instructive. It was written on 14 September, the week after the deadline for local authorities and businesses to submit proposals for LEPs. Prisk’s initial examination of the bids showed that “attempts to engage business have been cursory in too many circumstances”.

Knowing what he knew, Mr Prisk nevertheless told the Northern Regeneration Summit in Manchester on 12 October:

“So let’s be very clear: LEPs will succeed only if the local business community is right at their heart, shaping the vision and setting priorities for action. That is a key criterion against which all applications are being assessed.”

By the terms of the minister’s own leaked letter, LEPs have failed before they have even begun, reinforcing the point made by CBI director-general, Richard Lambert, that the process to date has been a “shambles”.

This led to just 24 out of 62 LEP applications getting approved last week, leaving whole swathes of the country (21 million people, according to figures compiled by the House of Commons Library for shadow business secretary, John Denham) at a serious potential economic disadvantage as the government’s new Regional Growth Fund opens for business.

As Left Foot Forward pointed out last week, LEPs are a solution no one seems to want. Unfortunately ministers have been hell-bent on sloppy ideological policy-making and are now waking up too late to the fact that LEPs, shorn of the regional development agencies’ £2.3 billion budget and larger operating scale, are simply not up to the task of supporting regional economic growth.

As Mr Denham put it:

“It’s crystal-clear the government has no coherent strategy for growth. The hasty and dogmatic changes they are ramming through are making the position for businesses worse.”

Like this article? Sign up to Left Foot Forward's weekday email for the latest progressive news and comment - and support campaigning journalism by making a donation today. 

10 Responses to “Minister: Local Enterprise Partnerships lack “a clear focus” on growth”

  1. Jacqui Pybus

    RT @leftfootfwd: Minister: Local Enterprise Partnerships lack "a clear focus" on growth: http://bit.ly/8YLld6 writes Kevin Meagher

  2. Julie Wareing

    RT @leftfootfwd: Minister: Local Enterprise Partnerships lack "a clear focus" on growth: http://bit.ly/8YLld6 writes Kevin Meagher

  3. Vince Maple

    RT @leftfootfwd: Minister: Local Enterprise Partnerships lack "a clear focus" on growth: http://bit.ly/8YLld6 writes Kevin Meagher

  4. Northern TUC

    RT @leftfootfwd: Minister: Local Enterprise Partnerships lack "a clear focus" on growth: http://bit.ly/8YLld6 writes Kevin Meagher

  5. Shamik Das

    Minister: Local Enterprise Partnerships lack "a clear focus" on growth: http://bit.ly/8YLld6 writes Kevin Meagher on @leftfootfwd

  6. Kevin leonard

    It is a great pity for many small business enterprises that the collapse of this condemnation government will come about perhaps too late to save them from going under…
    It is time the country woke up and stood against these lunatics and their political agenda to cull the left.

  7. Paul de Zylva

    Localism and boosting the role of local government may be name of the game but the thrust of ‘Local Growth’ – the Government’s new white paper on economic recovery from the bottom up – is boosting the role of the private sector.

    Fine, if the ‘sustainable economic growth’ aimed for by the White Paper leads to the creation of a low carbon economy.

    The economic crash means learning lessons including how to succeed economically without causing social, environmental and economic chaos.

    If economic recovery depends on more of the same economic activity which has pushed our natural world and common climate to their limits, then no lessons will have been learnt.

    More than ever before, quality of economic growth matter more than economic growth at any price.

  8. Cable: Drive for Local Enterprise Partnerships "Maoist and chaotic" | Left Foot Forward

    […] remarks follow a leaked letter from his deputy, business minister Mark Prisk, earlier this month noting that: “There is a strong view amongst the business community that many LEPs lack the ambition to […]

  9. Shamik Das

    @debsalini See http://bit.ly/8YLld6 for Prisk's attack on LEPs & http://bit.ly/aaGdkX & http://bit.ly/d72DCZ for Cable's!

  10. Businesses "deserve better" than the new Regional Growth Strategy | Left Foot Forward

    […] deputy, business minister Mark Prisk, conceded in a leaked letter back in November that LEPs were deemed to have: “…a lack of a clear focus on economic […]

Leave a Reply