Free-market think tank the Adam Smith Institute today published a report advocating the privatisation of, well, practically everything, reports Liam Thompson.
Not content with a public sector due to be cut back massively during this Parliament, right-wing think tank the Adam Smith Institute (ASI) today published a report advocating the privatisation of, well, practically everything. The report, “Privatisation Revisited”, recommends the Coalition Government sell off a huge range of assets and organisations that will generate a one-off £90 billion windfall for the public purse and, it claims, “rejuvenate” the British economy.
The hit list, drawn up by Europe’s self-appointed “favourite think tank”, includes Network Rail, the East Coast Main Line, BBC Worldwide, Trust Ports, the National Air Traffic Services, Scottish Water, Ordnance Survey, The Royal Mint, British Waterways, Royal Mail and Channel 4 (notably doing away with its bothersome “Public Service Remit” to encourage its sale).
It also recommends that public shares in the major banks, such as Royal Bank of Scotland, Lloyds TSB and Northern Rock, should be returned to the private sector – without as much as a hint to the market failure of 2008 which forced a Government bailout.
Written by City analyst Nigel Lawkins, the report also shows worrying long-term ambitions to privatise the entirety of the London Underground system (despite the failure of Metronet), creating a franchise system on Britain’s highways, all of the BBC and selling off 10 per cent of the Government’s property portfolio.
The report waxes lyrical about the first great wave of privatisation under Margaret Thatcher in the 1980s. Somewhat strangely, the report forgets to mention how North Sea oil revenues propped-up the Thatcher Governments and how ropey it is to fund revenue expenditure by selling assets, which after all, you can only sell off once.
The ASI report does, though, confess that:
“During the mid-1990s, UK privatisation seemed to lose its way. Admittedly, the most attractive businesses had already been sold and the privatisation cupboard was looking rather bare. Nonetheless, there were still some valuable assets that remained within public sector ownership – a scenario that remains to this day.”
Most importantly, however, the report completely ignores the social effects of widespread and rapid privatisations, from which much of the country is still recovering, begging the question: what wouldn’t they privatise?!
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
19 Responses to “Sell! Sell! Sell! Think tank urges coalition to privatise almost everything”
jeff marks
agree on the bbc, mouse. but who’d buy it, given that there’d be no license fee to pay for it?
Anon E Mouse
Jeff Marks – It would be snapped up as subscription tv for sale around the world – Top Gear is watched by millions abroad Doctor Who, Sherlock – get subscription for the US and you’ve done it.
Also the radio is loved everywhere but because of the licence fee it can’t be sold abroad – that is sellable.
I’d pay for the BBC on a Sky card. I know there is a whole bunch of sanctimonious drivel on it – “The Now Show” on R4 springs to mind – but those unpopular minority shows would rapidly disappear.
Get shot of it and let the overpaid managers see if they do get the same wages in the private sector…
jeff marks
@mouse
i actual find the now show the only funny comedy on R4. but yes, I’d pay for R4 no problem. and the website (although it crowds out competitors). bbc1 and 2 are pretty terrible. i watch newsnight, question time and the week in politics and that’s it (but then i have all the documentary channels on sky).
those managers only get paid so much coz they set their own wages at the bbc.
idle pen pusher
Highly disappointing blog. Isn’t this place meant to be ‘evidence based’?
“Cut back massively”: Total Managed Expenditure is expected to total £696bn this year (2010/11), according to the Emergency Budget. In 2015/16, the end of the Parliament, it is projected to be £756bn. That’s not a ‘massive cut’ in the public sector. It’s not even a ‘tiny cut’. It’s an increase. Even when you account for inflation, the figures don’t change much. The projection for 2015/16 at after discounting for inflation is £671bn, a cut of 3.6% phased in over 5 years, equivalent to 0.7% per year. On this definition, it is certainly a ‘cut’. Though it’s hard to justify the ‘massive’ bit when you’re talking about a cut of less than 4%. Also worth noting is that what is being cut is capital expenditure. In every single year, in both cash terms and after adjusting for inflation, current expenditure will rise.
It’s annoyed me so much I’ve devoted a whole blog post to it!
jeff marks
for ‘evidence based’, read ludicrous lefty twaddle.