David Cameron and Ed Miliband make speeches today on growth. New analysis shows that last week's Spending Review will remove around £60 billion from the economy.
Both David Cameron and Ed Miliband make speeches today on growth to the Confederation of British Industry. The impact of any pro-growth policies will, at best, offset the negative impact on growth of the spending review which is set to impact 490,000 public sector jobs and a further 200,000 in business and financial services. Analysis from Left Foot Forward shows that last week’s Spending Review will remove around £60 billion from the economy.
Last week the Institute for Fiscal Studies broke the Government’s plans down into tax rises, public service cuts, capital investment cuts, and welfare cuts. By plugging in multipliers prepared by the independent Office of Budget Responsibility, it is possible to show that the Coalition’s spending plans will take £59 billion from growth. By comparison Alan Johnson’s plan, which stuck to the timetable set out by Alistair Darling but put a greater emphasis on tax, would have impacted growth by the lower figure of £34bn.
The October Spending Review – which announced a greater focus than George Osborne’s June Budget on welfare cuts to reduce the impact of cuts on public services and investment – mitigated the impact of cuts by only £2bn. By contrast, Alan Johnson’s new approach reduced the impact on growth from £40bn in Alistair Darling’s plan to £34bn.
The figures on public service cuts clearly contradict George Osborne’s claim that:
“And because of our tough but fair decisions to reform welfare, and the savings we’ve made on debt interest…
“… I am pleased to tell the House it has been possible – and the average saving in departmental budgets will be lower than the previous Government implied in its March Budget.”
Alistair Darling mooted £44 billion of cuts to public services and capital investment compared to George Osborne’s £53 billion. Alan Johnson reduced Labour’s number to £34 billion.
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
52 Responses to “Spending review slashes £60bn from growth”
safefromwolves
RT @GuyAitchison: RT @FalseEcon: Spending review slashes £60bn from growth http://bit.ly/cpHSG4 (via @leftfootfwd)
Elly M
RT @FalseEcon: Spending review slashes £60bn from growth http://bit.ly/cpHSG4 (via @leftfootfwd)
Martin Johnston
surprised? RT @leftfootfwd: OBR figures shows that Spending Review slashes £60bn from growth http://bit.ly/cpHSG4
StephenH
RT @leftfootfwd: Spending review slashes £60bn from growth http://bit.ly/aMVJrI
Families Against National Debt
Will, yet again you have failed to acknowledge the existence of the private sector. It may grow faster thanks to the cuts – at least, so says the ITEM club, who have just upped their UK growth forecasts, pointing out that companies are sitting on a £100 bn cash surplus and that government “has bent over backwards to create business-friendly conditions”, which will allow them to invest, confident that lower debt means lower interest rates and taxes in the long run. Dividends are growing again. Exports are growing. The private sector created 343,000 new jobs in the first half of this year. I don’t – remotely – claim that this is some sort of unarguable case. I ask you not to ignore it, to engage with it.
Also – headlining £60 bn? When AJ proposed £34 bn on your workings? Say £25 bn, and say “assuming equal private sector performance in both scenarios” and you have yourself a case.