A key fund directed at upgrading British ports for offshore wind is to be axed. It could lead to loss of around 60,000 green jobs at 3 major wind turbine factories.
The Guardian reports this morning that a key fund directed at upgrading British ports to accommodate for an offshore wind boom is to be axed.
If their report is correct, this could lead to the loss of around 60,000 green jobs at three major wind turbine factories planned by industry.
Siemens, General Electric and Mitsubishi have all said over the last year that their proposed factories were contingent on this key funding. For example, back in July the Financial Times reported that:
Peter Loscher, chief executive of Siemens, told the Financial Times that a proposed £60m overhaul of some ports, intended to make them ready for the heavy duty wind turbines under development, was vital if the company was to proceed with building an £80m manufacturing facility that could create hundreds of “green jobs”.
“This is something that is definitely needed,” he said. “We are hopeful that it will go ahead.”
In February, Nick Clegg spoke exclusively to Left Foot Forward saying that the Lib Dems would invest £400m upgrading shipyards to make them suitable for offshore wind infrastructure.
Clegg told us:
“We need to remove the blockages – lack of space, access to facilities and transport to off-shore sites… Refurbishing seven of the ports will be a shot in the arm to increasing industry and manufacturing that will benefits regions like the North East.”
A Yougov poll last month showed that three-quarters of Lib Dem members wanted clean energy funds like this one either protected or increased in the CSR, and in the last fortnight Chris Huhne re-committed the government to hugely increasing the share of UK energy from renewable sources.
Professor Tom Burke, an influential energy expert who advises government and the private sector on low-carbon business, yesterday warned that the Treasury is attempting to scale back or kill the government’s proposed Green Investment Bank. In an article for The Guardian, Burke outlined four tests of the bank’s credibility:
– The bank will have a mandate wide enough to finance any measure that will reduce carbon emissions;
– It will be established by statute – this matters a lot as it guarantees its independence of government;
– It will have a full set of powers including the ability to issue green bonds;
– Its subscribed capital will begin at £2bn.
Today’s reported cut follows significant other cuts to clean energy budgets.
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
37 Responses to “60,000 green jobs under threat from Coalition cuts”
Chris
@mouse
LOL!!! Your inconsistency is showing through again:
“School finished early eh?”
“it’s why you don’t have a partner Chris”
Since when did school boys have partners? Total inconsistency in your sarcasm as well as your ideas.
There is more to green/environmental issues than Heathrow, the tories are trying to push through a massive cull of badgers based not on evidence but dogma.
Joss Garman
60,000 green jobs under threat – just blogged http://bit.ly/a3OLgN
Oxford Kevin
RT @jossgarman: 60,000 green jobs under threat – just blogged http://bit.ly/a3OLgN
william haymes
RT @leftfootfwd: 60,000 green jobs under threat from Coalition cuts http://bit.ly/a3OLgN
Anon E Mouse
Chris – As an animal lover I quite agree but what does that have to do with Climate Change and Joss Gasrman, the Ed Miliband fanboy?
Did you not check the link to Plane Stupid? You seem to be plain(ly) stupid if not (I’ve used that line before I admit)…
I certainly had girlfriends at school – you could be 18 – you have to be 17 to be driving and if that’s your excuse go with it little fella…